Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Squirrel

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    34,841
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    167

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Squirrel

  1. I thought I looked at last nights box scores in Rochester and didn’t see Thorpe. Well, guess it’s not him, then.
  2. I would think that could vary depending on years control. But I think we could find both. And should be looking for both, and make the deals we can.
  3. There is no choice that is ‘Yes’
  4. Well, there is a spot on the 40-man to add Rooker, but I’m not sure the Twins will do that yet.
  5. And? Are there 2 open spots on the 25-man, or is a pitcher being sent down along with Wade to the IL?
  6. Wow ... didn’t have to even see that one to know it was gone off the bat.
  7. Yeah, the timing of that was weird, even more so since they haven't filled it. Maybe they thought a deal was more imminent than it became?
  8. Ah, right ... but didn't we already recall a pitcher for Odorizzi? Not sure how that works, but can we send back the person we already called up in order to recall Thorpe in place of Odorizzi's start? (Asking because I really don't know the nuance of that. And I don't think Thorpe has pitched since last Sunday. But Smelzer hasn't pitched since ... I think Monday or Tuesday ... so either could pitch.)
  9. I would have liked to have seen Thorpe again ... but I think it's too soon for a recall there.
  10. To me that's in the category of frightening, not mind boggling. I think I said that once or twice in this thread already, didn't I? Tech stuff is scary.
  11. Heh, glad you’re not the manager, other than from your armchair.
  12. And by most I don’t mean 60%, I mean just shy of all, enough to give him rest when he needs it.
  13. Graterol is off the IL?
  14. I agree that Baldelli has managed the roster well, moving people around, giving people rest. But I still want to see Rosario in LF most of the time, and yes, I want to see him play there over Arraez.
  15. So, you’ll play him over Rosario?
  16. I wasn’t considering Astudillo when I answered that, as they both aren’t currently on the team.
  17. I don’t think he’s horrendous. He’s adequate but I’d rather have just about anyone else out there.
  18. if you look at who is in the HR derby, I think those individual players, most of them, anyway, have more HRs than our top HR hitter. What we’ve accomplished with HRs has been an exceptional team effort. Besides, I don’t want any of our players jinxed or ruined for the rest of the season.
  19. Then who goes down when everyone is healthy and you have 13 pitchers? He has options, he goes down. It’s the way it goes. If they go with 12 pitchers and continue to revolve them and shuttle them between here and AAA you can keep a 13th position player and that would be Arraez or Astudillo. And I wouldn’t say his defense is better than anyone else’s to justify removing someone else from the team. And I question that ‘good’ comment about him in left field. I also don’t think, defensively, he’s not better than Adrianza at 3rd or SS. Arraez will most definitely be in play for 2nd base next year, but for right now, unless the FO goes with 12 pitchers or removes another player, there isn’t room for him.
  20. Come on, Kohl ... get it done!
  21. Um, why? Was there some hidden meaning in that?
  22. And that's what slump breaking looks like!
×
×
  • Create New...