Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Squirrel

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    34,841
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    167

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Squirrel

  1. A music video I was in might be in one of those vaults.
  2. Prince should have done a version of Also sprach Zarathustra
  3. You do have choices in life ... just sayin' ...
  4. If Chief weren't allowed to post his groan/eye-rolling worthy jokes, he'd have nothing. But, alas, too hard to teach the dinosaur new tricks.
  5. The wild card game thread in 2017 was longer by several pages.
  6. It's not about finding a source that is 'to the left' ... it's about finding a source that isn't associated with inforwars and alt-right twitter trolls. If you can't differentiate between what your sources are, it's a problem. And if you don't understand why that's a problem, that's also a problem. But I'll take a look at these. But I will continue my stance ... one side is worse than the other. I don't condone either, but the alt-right is evil. The other is bad, and I don't defend them, and they should be held accountable ... but everything alt-right is simply evil. And that's my stance.
  7. No ... that's not my conclusion ... but the twitter post and the summit news blurb ... that is not supporting your stance in any way, imo ... only making it worse. This article from the seattle times ... it reports nothing of antifa. It was a single person, who mailed out suicide notes, wanted a deadly confrontation and got it, on the eve of the so-called ICE raids, which I guess really didn't happen. To me, what you've posted today say nothing toward what you've been saying this past month.
  8. Again ... I did more googling to research this ... and all I came up with are alt-right websites. I don't think it proves anything other than you are looking for confirmation and have done so in the worst arena. Congrats.
  9. No, it proves nothing ... other than you jump on the worst ship because it agrees with your stand.
  10. Absolutely not! Seriously? You don't consider the source at all? Why? because it's confirmation bias? The twitter poster is the 'nut job' ... an alt-right promoter ... you do know what that is, right? I also googled 'ICE bomber's manifesto' and found nothing other than this guy. AN ALT-RIGHT TWITTER TROLL. Van ... come on, man. While I don't condone violence, if this is the voice that is promoting this, that I question it ... a lot.
  11. Not to mention, after I googled Jack Posobiec, and found out he is an alt-right internet troll, is that the Jack Posobiec you are getting your news from now? Seriously? Come on, van. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Posobiec Is this the same one whose twitter you just pasted here?
  12. Summit News? Aren’t they owned by the same person who owns infowars?
  13. We now have two spots on our 40-man open. I’m hoping that they are filled with much better than we’ve let go. And the logic in my brain says why open up those spots if not for better.
  14. And spit elsewhere, too, please.
  15. Nice jinx, stringer. I blame you.
  16. Yep. Wait. Did we win or lose? Which team were you referring to here?
  17. I am. About some things.
  18. I look forward to reading your blog! It had better be good!
  19. That’s why I said I’m not going to organize a boycott, but as an individual, I may take into consideration certain things before spending money somewhere, and I think that’s fair.
  20. If we could get the big money and corporate money out of politics, some of these issues would be resolved. As long as corporations can support political candidates with big money, or super wealthy owners can throw money at political candidates or buy their support on issues I don’t agree with, then what is wrong with me deciding where and on what to spend my money based on that? I’m not going to go out and organize boycotts, and I’m sure I shop and spend money at places whose corporate policies and political spending I don’t agree with ... sometimes it’s hard not to ... but I don’t find anything wrong with any individual choosing to be conscientious on where they spend their money, and if that includes not spending at some place where ownership is awful, good for them. That said, do your own research and don’t rely on the latest FB meme or alarm.
  21. And this: http://twinsdaily.com/topic/14852-article-twins-daily-primer-the-blogs/ After that, I go back to my original post of suggestions.
  22. I found this: http://twinsdaily.com/topic/22417-article-stewart-and-harrison-quieting-critics/?p=479445
  23. I’m not if that was fixed or not, or could be fixed or not, but it has been a discussion in these forums. When I have time I’ll search and see what I can find. Or, just PM Brock directly. My only suggestion for right now would be to take a screen shot and paste that into your blog. Or maybe check with one of the regular writers, like Tom.
×
×
  • Create New...