From KLaw chat today: Q: I know you're against hiring managers with no previous experience, but is the Counsell case any different for you? He's essentially able to learn on the job with a team that has no playoff aspirations. By the time Milwaukee is ready to compete again he will either have a good feeling for the position or the Brewers can move on after his three years are up. KLaw: Why not just hire someone who's actually qualified and let *him* learn on the job? I don't know if Counsell will be good or bad even with experience, but the problem is that the Brewers don't know either. The guy has zero relevant experience. In what other industry is that considered a normal practice? followup: Q: Regarding managers with zero experience, what do general managers and owners see and think to consider hiring someone with no managing background at all? And will this be a continuing trend? KLaw: If you've read Daniel Kahnemann's Thinking, Fast and Slow - and if you haven't, you should, so here's my review http://klaw.me/1eOEauc - he talks about this specific fallacy, weighing the interview too heavily and the experience too little. It's a long-running trend and I have no qualms in calling it a major failure of management. It's no better than hiring your friends.