http://www.baseballamerica.com/online/prospects/international-affairs/2009/268475.html Badler to his credit was one of the only guys doing this stuff in 2009, the SI list looks exactly like his (he probably wrote it), I couldn't find anything from MLB.com their site is hard to dig through. Long and short of it is, Badler doesn't see many of these guys, the list are compiled based off buzz and bonus projections. So Arica was a low bonus guy, so he wouldn't have been listed, and there is not much buzz coming from Europe in general; so Kepler was a " who? He got how much? Best prospect in Europe?... oh that make sense" guy. We remember his signing not just because of his big bonus, but because of his interesting back story. Polanco was listed 23rd in 2009 based on a $ 700,000 rumored bonus from the Twins. You point is valid, just a little off base. Badler makes lists based off bonuses, but bonuses don't tell you who becomes the top prospects or the MLB players. Teams tend to have more data on Cuban, Korean, and Japanese players then DR 15 year olds based on international competitions. So less risk and Cuban player scouting can't be directly compared to the rest of Latin America scouting. I agree with you, that the Twins have had success in International/ Puerto Rico scouting based on a combination of a few key high bonus and deep scouting. But can the Twins be competitive in the Cuban market, when the players are more well known, and money seems to be the key difference not scouting? That I don't know.