1. The premise of the article being based on "umpire score cards" off Twitter is questionable at best.
There's an assumption of validity here that I don't think is warranted. It's not official and is based on pretty questionable assumptions.
2. On the larger subject of an automated strike zone, it's inevitable. It's coming.
Personally, I don't think that's a good thing, but I realize I'm probably in a minority of fans with that opinion. I doubt it'll be much better, and I worry it'll change the game in subtle but negative ways. I find it interesting most player interviews one reads don't seem in favor. Maybe I'm missing some.
It most certainly won't stop fans batching.