Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. My point was, don't worry about manipulating service time or other stuff. Try to win this year. If he's ready, he's likely better than any other 3B option they have, and he should be up. If he's not ready, he shouldn't be up.
  2. Minor league players buy their own shoes, gloves, bats and other equipment. They pay for private coaches. They give up (opportunity cost) making money in other professions. All of those are financial risks. All of them. Your analogy is not at all the same, since the players are literally the product.......If you think it's cool that billionaires that take no risk and make more money faster than the players, that's cool. But it's not factual that owners are taking risk and players are not. And, since owners cannot lose money, they are literally not taking risk. Indeed, teams rise in value than any other real investment, without fail. No failure in decades and decades. What financial risk are they taking?
  3. fascinating. Especially since the Twins refused to use him in the OF last year, or in spring training, as many of us hoped they would.
  4. Not even close to true. Players buy their own equipment, hire private coaches, and invest their livelihood and earning potential while in HS, college, and the minors. They are investing in their careers, and giving up lots of income in the process. Not even close to true the teams are taking "all the risk". Not even close to true. You are cool with the billionaires not taking any actual risk though, since it is literally impossible to lose money (since you can sell the asset) in owning a team? What risk, exactly, are they taking, because not one team in decades has decreased in value. I'm curious, really, what risk are they taking? And, since most players don't make it, they are taking way more risk, giving up their earning years (or college years).....
  5. Not sure if the Nick Anderson article was posted earlier, if so, apologies.... https://blogs.fangraphs.com/nick-anderson-is-improbably-excellent/
  6. try to win this year. Stop worrying only about the future.
  7. Sure, the teams are taking "all the risk".....sure, there just isn't more money to spend on salaries....sure.... https://mlb.nbcsports.com/2019/04/10/every-baseball-team-is-worth-at-least-a-billion-dollars/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeozanian/2019/04/10/baseball-team-values-2019-yankees-lead-league-at-46-billion/#39fdb5f569b2
  8. Kyle Wright is pitching in the majors already......I'm not sure your point, exactly. But this year and next, the Twins would be better off with Wright, most likely. After that, probably Lewis, but these two years count too....
  9. Last post.....I forgot to mention the likelihood Sano is at DH/1B in the next year or two...... I wonder if there is an OF they can try at 3B......in the minors, I mean.
  10. I'm not sure, but this seems kind of petty, or judgmental, of people that have hobbies outside the game.....
  11. I literally said 2 of them might hit, not sure how I'm counting chickens........I left off Baddoo and about 6 other players in the minors that can probably hit and field as well as Austin will. Of course any ONE of them is a long shot, but it isn't a long shot that they have a replacement level player that will play 1B and DH in their system.......
  12. We're going off this year's sample size, and not last year and projecting likely outcomes? I'm not ready to do that....you might be....
  13. I would not have signed Cron, but they did. Once they did, there wasn't really any way Austin stays on this roster if everyone is healthy. I would have used that money on pitching..... And, I'm just not worried about it. They have Rooker, Kiriloff, Wade, Weil, Lanarch, Jeffers, Garver and others that can move to 1B next year. While I think Austin can probably hit, I don't know that. I am confident 2-4 of those guys will, and that they can also play 1B and the OF better than Austin.
  14. Actually, no. The Twins were loaded with RP with no options last year, and couldn't send guys up and down. It was one of my biggest issues with last year's bullpen, frankly.
  15. Not if Cron is good and Austin isn't. Plus, they have about 8 guys in AAA, AA, A+ that have Austin's hit tool, but that can also play OF or 1B better than him.
  16. Good move. Are there people that don't know the rules didn't allow many of the other relief pitchers to be brought up this early? That's why it was DeJong. And, I hope they use AAA like the Dodgers do, and bring people up and down as needed.
  17. That's a higher hit tool than many DH types these days, and he could sub in the OF if needed. He's a classic example of the death of the middle class hitter.
  18. Exciting watching a pitcher "hit".
  19. Because you don't know, and there were no other good options. Why not? And maybe Rooker will be the same, but most second round picks are about that.
  20. Right, I'm open to any idea....but I'd need to see an actual proposal first....
  21. So fresh I haven't even read it.... https://blogs.fangraphs.com/with-wes-johnson-twins-pitching-appears-to-be-embracing-change/ It's such an obvious plan, but the dang myth of "establish your fastball" dies as hard as "establish the run to set up the pass" does in football....
  22. Because the wealthy don't have money sitting around to pay it, if it is unrealized. I get what you are saying, but I just don't know how it works. Nor do I like it for some reason I can't put my finger on. Inheritance is a transaction, and the people getting the money never had it. So, they can pull some cash out and pay taxes. That's different than someone just sitting on lots of stock. What if you tax Bezos so much he doesn't have a controlling interest in the company he helped build? I don't like that idea.....
  23. I was told Astudillo was too short for 1B........I like the thinking here. Try it.
  24. stock wise? No idea. Use wise? Easy to use as a collaboration tool. I like it......but you were probably asking about the stock.....
×
×
  • Create New...