Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. They have a plethora of guys in AAA and AA who need a look, because they have one guy under contract past this year. Perez means they will gather less information, all for the upside of a good number five.
  2. Money quote: For teams, though, free agency is becoming a better place to shop for wins, particularly if your team is currently competitive, as it reduces the present value of any picks surrendered in the signing process. There’s an opportunity for a team to zig and spend on free agents while other teams are zagging into austerity. https://theathletic.com/793317/2019/01/31/sarris-is-free-agency-becoming-a-more-cost-effective-way-to-improve-a-team/
  3. Eno Sarris @enosarris Damn just said on radio today that Twins should’ve been in on Miley. They frustrating.
  4. Yup, that makes sense. thanks to you and spycake!
  5. why the Marlins won't allow teams to negotiate an extension. that decreases their leverage, and their likely return.
  6. I've been trying to figure out why they'd do this, and can't.
  7. only a few bucks? Here are Turner's WAR the last three years: 3.3 2.8 4.6 His projections for next year are for more than that. The odds of any player in the minors doing that are low, let alone Gordon.
  8. Parker should be replacing the guys behind Pressley......they need 7-8 RPs. IMO, of course.
  9. Buxton is less valuable at 1B, than in CF......the defensive adjustment shows that. You can easily replace Cron/Austin's defense with the other (or Kepler, or Sano or lots of players), but how do you easily replace the defense Buxton supplies? Certainly not with Cron or Austin........
  10. A great set up man, followed by a better catcher, followed by another good RP.....moves aren't in a vacuum. Your question seems to be: should we care they don't add one more good player, if one more good player won't help them win it all. IMO, we should care if they have good players, and are always adding more good players. Maybe in 3 years these guys will matter. In the meantime, the FO decided not to sign FA RPs, and I'm guessing we'll see 3-4 guys throw negative WAR innings, all of which Pressley could have absorbed.
  11. It's a very good article. Average? In the last 6 years, they've never been higher than 18th, and in five of those six years, they've been 20th or lower. That's fine, if you care more about how much money you make (we aren't talking about losing money, but how much you make) than about winning...... This year, ,they won't crack the top 20 most likely, though they might, since so many teams are not trying to win this year. But just because other teams are not spending....does not mean the Twins are also not spending. There might be many reasons for this. They might think the upcoming labor issues are going to be bad, and so aren't signing deals past that date. They might think revenues will drop (which has never happened in the history of the big 4 sports in the US, but hey, it might happen some day). They might think Martin Perez is actually a good pitcher, and the guys that cost more aren't. They might be saving all their money for next year (a song we've heard over and over). They might not believe in this core at all. They might be waiting to see which of the core need replacing next year (like, somehow, the perfect match will be there, and will sign here). Who knows? All I know is that they had lots of money come off the books, and they likely won't spend 45% of revenue on players. And, there were good players available (it's their job to pick the right ones of the available pool).
  12. I find it hard to believe anyone signs anyone, on any team, much between now and the next CBA......
  13. It isn't the money, it's the roster spot, and not gathering information on the four or five guys now behind him. And if four teams were bidding on him, his agent did a bad job getting money.
  14. Given that first base, DH, types barely get paid, and up the middle players get more and aren't out of work as much, I'd hypothesize that teams place more value, and find those players harder too replace.... Which is the point. How hard are they to replace? It's much harder to replace up the middle defenders than first basemen..... Hence, they get an adjustment in the calculation.
  15. This
  16. They could use a good RP this year, on a team projected to win 82-84 games. When do they play for the present? Take their worst relievers, and replace those innings with Pressley...
  17. I'd bet a lot of money none are, so don't worry about seven.
  18. Revenues and team values are growing faster than spending. That's a very sustainable business model. The data is publicly available. But I guess labor is somehow greedy.
  19. Got it, and yes, definitely a different ranking! I wonder where FG will have him. Keith and the FG's guys are former scouts....
  20. DFA DeJong......that lasted about as long as their Rule V pickups....
  21. nice try!
  22. DeJong DFA to make room for Perez. One heck of a trade.....
  23. But but, we were told they were filling the minors.......already DFA. Nice trade.
  24. I don't recall who I liked more, but I predicted the Twins would take Gordon.
×
×
  • Create New...