Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    46,375

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    Certainly one opinion, not shared by fangraphs, as neither is in their top 100.
  2. Mike Sixel
    Then don't trade him.
  3. Mike Sixel
    Btw, fangraphs removed Tait from the top 100 list this week.... So, double yuck.
  4. Mike Sixel
    How would we know who was offered? They didn't have to trade him....
  5. Mike Sixel
    It was a huge part of our retirement savings since I was there for a decade. I think we're still ok, but I'm no longer sure.
  6. Mike Sixel
    Keaschell and Culpeper are college guys who will be here this year and next, while they have Lopez and Ryan.... Tait will not.
  7. Mike Sixel
    They did not need to trade him now! More bidders in the off season! I guess I should stop....
  8. Mike Sixel
    This trade signals full on rebuild. Unless somehow Abel is good now...... They didn't get a guy that is likely to help for two or three years.
  9. Mike Sixel
    It can be both less fun to watch, and still the right thing to do to win....
  10. Mike Sixel
    They could have just drafted Teel, who is already in the majors....
  11. Mike Sixel
    Ummmm. It's literally the opposite. Tait is much higher ranked.
  12. Mike Sixel
    I agree they weren't getting Painter.....
  13. Mike Sixel
    Same names for me ....
  14. Mike Sixel
    I thought I wanted them fired before..... Brutal.
  15. Mike Sixel
    Who wouldn't after this awful Duran trade?
  16. Mike Sixel
    Not impressed. This is what you get when you can't develop any catchers? That's two trades for guys who won't be here for years and years. Like, this is a really bad trade.
  17. Mike Sixel
    Good thing they played with a short bench! No one could have seen this coming with the history of this FO.....
  18. Mike Sixel
    You can think what you want. I'm merely pointing out what others are saying. But it's hard to believe anyone thinks including a negative asset didn't decrease the return.
  19. Mike Sixel
    I'd trade him. I think the owners pocket the money, and I think he could be good again, but I think he could decline. This team isn't winning with old guys, and maybe if they get rid of CC, they'll go young everywhere. Which also might not work! But it might discourage the France type signing..... I'm just done with this core.
  20. Mike Sixel
    People on these boards have posted the data. The twins are middle of the pack in innings, in the minors and majors. I have no interest in crunching the numbers myself.
  21. Mike Sixel
    I mean, the national media is saying they got less back because they included dobnak.....
  22. Mike Sixel
    I'm not sure what you're trying to say? Maybe I'm just tired.
  23. Mike Sixel
    Complaining they are giving young guys an opportunity, while also calling for them to sell does seem like an odd choice. Agreed.
  24. Mike Sixel
    Good thing I live inland! Let's hope nothing actually happens. I can't take much more news.
  25. Mike Sixel
    I mean, this game is likely over. Save the good pitchers that aren't traded.
×
×
  • Create New...