Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    48,148

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    336

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Mike Sixel
    Agreed. He's the only one I move on for.
  2. Mike Sixel
    I agree, but the same was said about TJack and Bridgewater..... Some guys just aren't good or mature. I'm fairly sure McCarthy will fail in Minnesota, but I don't like any of the alternatives. So let's see..... But I'm guessing 7-9 wins again, most of them like last year, after other teams have given up.
  3. Mike Sixel
    If you only grade things after they happen, what's the point? And, sometimes things turn out badly, even if you make a good choice (of vice versa). If your pilot decides to use the flaps wrong, do you wait to see if you crash before you know it was a bad decision?
  4. Mike Sixel
    So you're saying there's a chance.
  5. Mike Sixel
    I agree it will be years down the line....if it happens.
  6. Mike Sixel
    Heh. He's got the most upside of any of their options, which says a lot about how few QBs even are alive on the planet. I'm saddened by this. Who could have predicted taking a QB whose college offense was built around running and not using the QB would fail?
  7. Mike Sixel
    Truly mind boggling they tendered him. For a team on a budget, it's a fireable decision.
  8. Mike Sixel
    F
  9. Mike Sixel
    Other than Burrow, none of the other guys are all that good. No thanks.
  10. Mike Sixel
    We'll know a lot more about the players' thoughts about a cap when the replacement is named....
  11. Mike Sixel
    This sucks. Also, good thing they didn't trade Ryan and start the rebuild more..../s
  12. Mike Sixel
    Which seems bad. There must be someone to sign if the dodgers want money?
  13. Mike Sixel
    They have no catchers, no 1B, and questions in the OF (not to mention they lose two starting pitchers in a year or two). I'm not trading for a SS at this point. YMMV, of course* * I mean, if someone makes a crazy offer, sure....
  14. Mike Sixel
    Just terrible tonight
  15. Mike Sixel
    Over.
  16. Mike Sixel
    Maye is not ready for this
  17. Mike Sixel
    Why would anyone trade for a SS of you think Houston or Culpeper is one? They aren't winning this year.... Have patience.
  18. Mike Sixel
    This is why the NFL has rules helping offense. Defense is boring.
  19. Mike Sixel
    Either Burrow or McCarthy should be the starter. No way on trading McCarthy for another low ceiling guy. Just roll with it if you have to.
  20. Mike Sixel
    I see zero downside of this at all.
  21. Mike Sixel
    As I said when they took Lewis....they'll never pay for an elite pitcher, take the pitcher (assuming there is one).
  22. Mike Sixel
    For some reason, my account wasn't deleted, so I came back to see what y'all thought today. I'm good with this decision.
  23. Mike Sixel
    Y'all are about my favorite posters here, so I thought I'd drop this note here. I'm leaving Twins Daily. Brock knows why.
  24. Mike Sixel
    Fitzgerald outhit every single guy they've brought in so far last year (in a tiny sample).....
  25. Mike Sixel
    you gave them way too much credit for signing Bell, IMO.
×
×
  • Create New...