Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,375
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. 17 years of evidence is pretty good evidence that this isn't just an issue of there NEVER being a good trade available to add talent, isn't it? And yes, process is important, but so are results. I'm sure Butera followed a great process, or Shane Robinson does, that doesn't mean they should keep their job just because they have that job. Results matter.
  2. I want to know when we should expect them to be good. When can we say "this isn't luck, they should now be good".
  3. Actually, other people said Ryan didn't really mean it, that he had to say that as GM........just like they said he didn't mean it the year before, or the year before. To which I asked, should I believe him, or not?
  4. People are posting they should wait until they are more ready to go more all in.....I'm asking when we should expect that. When should we expect it to be expected to be good, not "luck and not something to bet on"? That's really not that hard to understand. When should we expect them to be good? When should we expect the FO to go all in?
  5. cool...when should we expect them to try to win, then, if not this year?
  6. Fair enough........
  7. Out of curiosity......what has the GM done to get them back in contention? Santana, Hughes, May......other than that, it is draft picks or guys already in the system, right?
  8. Infinitely more than they have received from Meyer.......
  9. Not a bad list at the lower levels.......hopefully some progress right away next year.
  10. And TR says he would do the Ramos trade again. ......
  11. You missed sacrifice bunting in the third inning.......when facing one of the best offenses in the game. But ya, not one of his best outings.
  12. He traded for Jepsen, what more do you want, man?
  13. Looks like 3-4:1 is about right for the delta between TOR and MN. Yes, the Angels are falling apart right now......
  14. OOOH, that's a nice line......I'll check the playoff odds page and come right back.
  15. Are they now tied for the WC? Who would people bet on right now?
  16. So, you move a good SP to the bullpen, and won't use him back to back days. got it.
  17. What happened, now? Can't tell on Gamecast.....other than, you know, boyer stinks. And is still on the roster. And is playing over May and Jepsen. Nice job, manager ......
  18. Wait, boyer is in, and not May or Jepsen? What? I mean, WHAT? How is that possible? Clearly, Trevor May is NOT yet the high leverage guy. But, hey, he's more valuable in the bullpen than starting.....
  19. Seriously, out of the entire post, you pick that? I'll try again, of the ELITE prospects this year, in AA or higher, he will be the only one not a regular this year, or next year, that's what people are suggesting?
  20. You really think the umps are biased? come on. that's a loser mentality. Watching on Gamecast, several pitches to Sano hit the plate, but were called balls. It just is. It's not some grand conspiracy. Plus, your manager bunted in the third inning, and your hitters couldn't get 1 ball out of the outfield with the bases loaded. This isn't about the umpires.
  21. ya, it was more, "I think Kepler is likely to take good ABs when offered the chance", than Kepler replaces Rosario. I like Rosario......but I also like Kepler.
  22. That Rosario AB is why I like Kepler here so much.......not having any idea if he's ready or not, obviously.
  23. Well then....... I think I'd maybe talk to Eddie about pitch selection again.
×
×
  • Create New...