Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,998
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    330

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Why do you think next year will be better? They won't have a lead in the division to start, and likely won't have a SS. They will have to replace at least two starting pitchers. I really am curious why anyone thinks next year is likely to be better.
  2. How will next year be better? They likely have no SS.... And need to replace Bundy and Archer. They won't have a built in lead in the division. I'm genuinely curious why anyone thinks next year is likely to be better.
  3. I feel like every year we see this post, and every year they lose one or two guys that usually don't amount to much. There is plenty of space available, given some of the players on the 40 man now. That said, sure, would be great to trade some middling prospects for a RP or two....
  4. Kepler is in the honorable mentions of fangraphs trade value series...... But no rebuilding team wants those players.
  5. Colorado has literally said they want to sign Bard to an extension...... Unreal.
  6. Clearly I misunderstood. Apologies. I thought you said fire Falvey over the pitching pipeline.
  7. This. I don't know what people expect. There was nothing in the minors when they came, nothing in terms of pitching.
  8. Winning the division two of the last three years, and leading this year, and you fire him? Tough boss. I'm constantly amazed at this site.
  9. So, not likely next year either. Just punt that too? Trade off veterans?
  10. I'd deal many of the hitting prospects, just not those two pitchers for one pitcher.
  11. Stupid idea that's been discussed over and over for some reason.
  12. I wonder what Keith doesn't like about Winder? I mean, if he's not a starter, then I do this deal for sure.
  13. I'm not dealing Winder and Woods Richardson for one pitcher. I'm not sure I deal winder at all.... And I'm a trade for some help guy.
  14. They won the division two of the last three years. How many good years do they need before they aren't stumbling to success?
  15. And how would they be better next year? Or are you punting that already?
  16. Who is trading for CC? That he'd go to? Realistically.
  17. You think pitchers forgot what the coach said in one week? I have my doubts.
  18. Larnachs weak arm? Teams have already stopped running on him. Unreal.
  19. If acquiring a guy with 6 years of control isn't pipeline, we have a different meaning, but I get that.
×
×
  • Create New...