Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

TL

Verified Member
  • Posts

    260
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TL

  1. This is a good point and should be factored into discussions about the trades last year. Hopefully he pans out so we don’t look back and wish we had won a few more to end up picking in the 6-10 range 😀. The prospects we got back (Abel, Bradley, Rojas, Tait, Mendez, Gallagher, etc.) are potentially much better than what we gave up and have many many more years of control. The front office looked at what they had coming up and played for the future. It’s hard to disagree with that and I feel much better with Abel, Bradley and Rojas all potentially starting for the next 5 years than I do with one more year of Jax and Duran relieving (we won’t mention the 4 years of Varland).
  2. Bullpen is suddenly a strength, who would have thunk it. Funderburk is having the same second half he had last year. I may put him in the same class as Minter where we can deploy whomever is more rested for that lefty fireman role.
  3. Promoting now would not impact his free agency (under current CBA); it only impacts “rookie” status and whether he could net us a draft pick by winning rookie of the year. That’s not nothing, but not worth the delay IMO.
  4. Exactly. And Jenkins will save us some runs. Larnach makes the occasional diving play, and doesn’t get to a lot, that a good LF makes standing up. Jenkins can play every day and let Larnach DH and play the field occasionally. If they insist on having Bell/Larnach in the lineup most days then Keaschall becomes the 4th guy (just for remainder of this year) who plays against lefties, comes in to pinch hit against lefty relievers, and gets in vs righties when Buxton needs a day off. I love Jackson as a backup, but not as a 3rd catcher during a pennant chase.
  5. I understood keeping Jackson on through the deadline in case Jeffers got traded, but at this point 100% he can be replaced next year (that is, if someone claims him).
  6. The eliminate is Jackson. Caratini’s time can be limited until/unless he snaps out of it. In no world should be see time at DH/1B right now. And we don’t have time to let him hit is way out of it in games.
  7. Lewis, wow. He’s on one and it could just carry the team. Also need Buck back to form soon and a few other moves (Jenkins) to get this offense going before it is too late. I think they can severely limit/eliminate the at bats for Jackson, Gray and Caratini at this point.
  8. My head agrees with this… but I still irrationally want to see them this year!
  9. It feels like prospect rankings undervalue defense or they just don’t believe in the bat yet, which is understandable. But if he keeps this up the combination of defense and offense starts to look like a top 25 prospect. Is Cooper Pratt a crazy comp?
  10. These trades feel like the right approach to give the team a fighting chance this year without sacrificing the future. With Buxton out it would have been tough to lose even one of Larnach and Jeffers given their importance to this lineup. I’m glad they’re rolling with these guys (though I do hope Jenkins comes up for Jackson and Larnach moves mostly to DH). And reality is that we still do not have to lose those two or Ryan for no value. I would bet Pohlad has given approval on a QO for Jeffers and if Larnach keeps performing he should have a trade market in the offseason.
  11. Have to trust their evaluation on this one that Hill won’t turn into a top 3 starter. If not then it’s all good. We won’t know for 4 years or so.
  12. They could potentially be interested in Lewis for 1B/3B or Keaschall if they believe he can stick in CF. Keaschall is going to be good for a long time but I think I’d rather give him than Culpepper based on this team’s needs. However, if they had interest in Lewis perhaps Emma, Lewis, Quick, Gallagher could get it done. I’d consider putting Abel in for Quick if they liked him better despite the injury. Whatever it is, will cost a lot.
  13. I’m not sure who’d I’d rather give up - Houston or Culpepper - but if the Twins believe Houston’s breakout is real then you can absolutely do this trade. It would hurt for sure, but a parade would help heal those wounds!
  14. I doubt it would jump to that immediately but in any event it’s still 8MM for a platoon left fielder who plays bad defense when you have two younger and higher upside guys ready.
  15. It’s possible it hurts this year (though debatable given he’s put up these numbers in a platoon and plays bad defense). But 8MM he’ll earn next year could be better used elsewhere when you have Jenkins and E-Rod waiting. Put it into a QO for Jeffers!
  16. Or designate Gray. Larnach has been good at the plate so I’d prefer, all else equal, to keep his bat in the lineup - but getting him out of left field should also be a priority. In my view you can make 3 moves to really go for it: IN: Culpepper, Jenkins, higher leverage reliever OUT: Larnach, Bell, Gray (Or swap out Martin and keep one of Larnach / Bell) Result: Improved defense and bullpen, comparable hitting
  17. I’m actually surprised some are so down on this trade. A back end innings eater that we desperately need who is not a rental for a guy who is 4 years away at best and is way more than likely to never see more than a cup of coffee in the bigs. Sign me up.
  18. Not saying you’re wrong by any means but I think I’d rather trust a normal starter’s routine. Plus, if he’s as good as I think he’d be out of the bullpen Shelton may not be able to resist pushing him harder.
  19. I used to be on board but now I don’t think we see Preillip in the pen. It would save innings for sure but he’d likely be throwing with more effort and on less rest, and that may be more dangerous. I think better to keep with the program - skip a turn or push him back when you can and otherwise keep his pitch count under 100. Sometimes piggyback with Rojas now that we have another lefty in Minter.
  20. Your points on Emma are fair. And I’d trade him for 4 years of a mid rotation or better starter. The trouble is that, as others have pointed out, this looks like an outlier year for Hancock. It’s smart for the Mariners to cash in on him now and I fear it would be at our expense. If he’s a front line guy then they should want to keep him. I’ll gladly trade Emma and more for Kane or Sloan and they can keep Hancock
  21. Respectfully disagree. Jeffers is our best healthy position player (and a RH bat, which we also need more of); and I see people throwing Emma intro trades like an afterthought a lot recently. He is in a different world as a prospect than Gonzales and Mendez. Granted he can’t stay healthy but trading him (with Jeffers!) for a back end rotation piece throws in the towel this year and has a chance to haunt the Twins for the next 10.
  22. Well in my defense I said “mostly” not full time. As players get older many seem to be able to better embrace the DH. If Keaschall, Emma and Jenkins play the same or better defense than a mid 30s Buxton I can see him spending 60+ percent at DH to keep his bat in the lineup more often as opposed to the IL.
×
×
  • Create New...