When I was a kid, on Sunday nights, before the Internet, my dad would always let me stay up for the 10 o'clock news so I could watch the Vikings highlights one more time (the highlights were usually just the touchdowns, of course, no other plays mattered). Anyway, the formula was the same, every Sunday night: News at 10 for about 18 minutes, weather for 5 or 6 minutes, then the sports, then the happy ending of the day. Over time it occurred to me that this was the formula every night, even on nights without football. I asked myself, why isn't there more time for highlights on Sunday? Is there really the same amount of news on every day of the week? Why do they need to stop right at 10:35 every night? But the bleache blonde was so beautiful (Henley), and the anchorman's hair was so perfect (Warren Zevon), that I never really cared what they were saying! Just kidding. I've been a media skeptic ever since. I probably never got a good answer to why the news must end right at 10:35, no matter how much or how little news there is on any given day. And now knowing a little more than I did then, even thought I "get" why, I still don't really understand why. At least the newspapers still run special sections when the baseball seasons starts, instead of trying to fit it all into the sports page.