DJL44

Trent Grisham would be a great fit for the Twins at that price. I don't think he would actually be non-tendered.

Won't be much to write about on Twins Daily if that's how the offseason works out.

But what is an overpay? The last 3 seasons he's been worth $42M, $19M and $20M. If you like pitcher wins he's 2nd among active pitchers his age (to Gerrit Cole). I know he's getting older but the simplest projections would have him at least $30M projected value for 2024. If you knock 20% off for age every year that makes it a 3 year $73M contract. Someone will probably offer him 4 years $80M and that seems fair. Yu Darvish got a 6 year $108M contract and he was older than Gray is now. I'd agree that anything over $108M is an overpay for Sonny Gray.

Literally anywhere else. He's a no-brainer for every team in baseball at 1 year $20M.

Even then I think he can do better than $20M on a 1 year deal.

MLB is often the highest rated show on summer evenings, even with the restrictions we see due to lack of access. Improving access will improve ratings. Sports also draws higher ad revenue because people are less likely to skip the ads. If the going ad rate for the Twins is bad then I don't know how the other shows on television make any money.

MLB team has financial difficulties: issue a press release or at least leak it to a reporter MLB team makes a lot of money: No comment There is a history of ownership lying to the press about their finances, always crying poor.

There's a bias in what stories show up in the newspaper. Why did that financial tidbit make it into the news but you never see stories showing that some team was massively profitable unless they have to disclose it publicly (like Atlanta 2022)?

This I disagree with. He's 26 and has never had a 6 inning start in his entire career. It's not going to happen. Due to his past injury history his career is more likely to be over at age 30 than it is for him to be a bulk starter. Use him now before his arm falls off completely.

The posting fee doesn't count toward the luxury tax which makes guys like this more valuable to teams paying the luxury tax.

Especially when the alternative is more Cole Sands innings in the big leagues. If you're going to use a cheap guy in low leverage relief use the highest upside guy you have.

Baseball teams get to be extra profitable during the "rebuild" when they dump expensive players and go with the cheap youngsters. The time to spend and be less profitable is when you're contending.

Agreed on Ohtani. Not only is he the best player in baseball he's also the most marketable player in baseball by a large margin. He gains interest from around the world. He's a DH to help him pitch, not because he's a terrible fielder. If he never pitches again he's probably a RF/1B as good as Bryce Harper. Ultimately I think he's worth more marginal revenue to the Yankees or Dodgers than he is to the Twins so the Twins don't have a real chance to obtain him. I think the Twins brought in Carlos Correa to be one of those star players that helps push them to becoming a contender. I don't see them spending big on Correa to contend and then deciding to pull back when it actually worked. They can pull back on spending during the next rebuild and make more profit then.

The Twins are pretty good at converting starters to relievers. I'd like to see them try that more often with free agents who have done poorly in the rotation but might have something to unlock in the bullpen. The Orioles were successful doing that with Jorge Lopez and then they dealt him to the Twins for a pretty nice prospect haul. Grab a few guys who are free agent starters with an ERA around 5 and move them to the bullpen in AAA. If you can make 1 Brock Stewart every year it will more than pay for itself. Example names: Chris Flexen, Jose Urena, Luke Weaver, Justin Dunn, Austin Voth, Julio Teheran, Zach Davies

I actually hope he's in the bullpen as soon as possible. At age 26 there's no reason to spend any more time on development or worrying about service time. If he's healthy let him pitch in the big leagues.

I wouldn't count on Mahle at all in 2024. He's had shoulder injuries in addition to the elbow. They might get 5 innings out of Mahle like they did with Paddack.

Here's what I see as the worst case scenario: Twins: "Hey Bally's, we know you barely made money at $55M last season. Would you pay $50M this year?" Bally's: "Sure. We'll make $5M." Better Twins: "Hey Bally's, would you still pay us $30M to carry games even if we drop the streaming blackouts? You've also got to lower your cost to the cable companies so they all buy your channel." Bally's: "Sure, we can make money at that level even if we aren't exclusive." Best Twins: "Hey Channel 45, would you carry our games? We'll produce the ads in-house and make all that money ourselves." Channel 45: "Sure, we would love the increased audience going into our evening newscast."

If they're not in on Bellinger then I expect the other players (Taylor, Kiermaier, Bader) to be available later. There won't be a run on mediocre CF until the premium guys sign.

That's if the next TV contract pays $0 a year which is a ridiculous assumption. If the contract drops in half (which is very pessimistic) then they're down $5-6M in payroll. That's a nothing burger.

True, but there's also little incentive to move quickly on that this offseason.

Well, considering I often watch baseball with the sound off completely I guess I'd agree. What's interesting about the sport is the athletes, the action on the field. The pitch clock was all about more action and less time waiting for the action to happen. The announcers are supposed to give context that helps the viewer appreciate the action. Anything that distracts from the actual game of baseball is going to hurt ratings, not help them. During the playoffs I was forced to watch the Pedro Martinez alternate broadcast once because Max was glitching on the main broadcast. There were some moments where the more casual presentation was entertaining but I couldn't wait to get back to the regular broadcast where I could see the game full-screen and hear the sounds of the game. I don't want to watch other people watch the game for the same reason I can't understand watching other people play video games instead of just playing video games but some people seem to like it. Maybe we need more "alternate" broadcasts. Put Provus and Gladden on for some and have three people chatting for others. I think that listening to an old ballplayer (or announcer) complain endlessly about how baseball was a lot better 30 or 40 years ago is annoying as hell. You don't hear that in other sports. I don't hear basketball announcers complaining that three-point shooters are ruining the game and I don't hear how rule changes to limit concussions have ruined football. I do like changing up the color announcer. Each individual person only has so many stories to tell. Getting a new perspective is a good thing over 162 games. I don't need a purely home-team perspective either.

The decision on Sonny Gray will come pretty quickly. If he returns then the rest of the shopping (bullpen, RH outfield bat) can take it's time.

Talking head programming is popular because it's cheaper to produce than scripted programming or even the sports highlight shows that used to run all day on ESPN. It costs relatively little to have someone sit and talk into a camera for a few hours. I'm actually surprised ESPN doesn't just run infomercials when they don't have a game to broadcast. I don't know what additional demographic you're trying to get with your suggestions. Is it just male football fans ages 25-55? It's certainly not women. The best way for the Twins to reach more viewers is to put more games on broadcast TV, fewer on premium cable channels and end the streaming blackouts. That's the main problem reaching their audience.

The Twins will NOT be broadcasting games for free next season. They won't be losing $55M. Pro sports is some of the most desired content on linear television. Apple TV just paid $85M to broadcast 2 games a week.

You mentioned the Power Trip morning show. Same difference.