Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Otto von Ballpark

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,662
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    74

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Otto von Ballpark

  1. Littell is relatively young, but I get the impression that he was an "early bloomer". Maybe it's the beard. Perfect Game had him listed at 6'4, 201 lbs back in his draft year of 2013, and he was still only 17. (That seems to be the source of his age advantage, that he basically graduated high school a year early.) In that sense, he reminds me a bit of Gonsalves. Gonsalves was 19 for his pro debut, but he's another big kid who reached AA for 13 starts in his age 21 season. (Of course, Gonsalves was then asked to repeat AA each of the following 2 seasons...) Also interesting is that Littell has been traded twice already, first by the Mariners for a reliever, next by the Yankees for 2 months of Jaime Garcia. So despite his size/age/stats, maybe he's still seen as a bit of an underdog, stuff-wise? And I posted this elsewhere, but maybe this isn't the right organization for Littell to get an opportunity. We tried to jump-start him with call-ups already, but looking at our roster, he may only be 8th or 9th on our SP depth chart for 2018-2019.
  2. Encouraging, though worth noting that the starter for the other team has a pretty low K rate (15.8% or 6.6 K/9, versus league averages of 22.3% and 8.5), and 4 of Buxton's 5 PAs were against him.
  3. You mean, a future Bobby Wilson? Sure, why not. (Although at the same age, Wilson had a 104 wRC+ at AA, versus Navaretto's 73 this year.)
  4. And those big AAA reliever K rates already seem to translate pretty poorly to MLB, if the Twins system is any indication. Didn't mean to pick on you or Littell, just throwing a note of caution there, as folks often see that K rate and get overly impressed, as it would have been well above league average a few years ago.
  5. I don't care for farewell tours, too much of a distraction. Just let him play like normal and make up his mind in the offseason. In any case, I'll give him an extra round of applause attending my last home game of the year.
  6. Super small sample, but apparently Happ and Hamels had poor starts today, while Gibson was pretty good (albeit against Baltimore).
  7. Cave K's a lot more than Kepler. Kepler should have the productivity advantage, if he can ever manage a league average BABIP.
  8. The Orioles have probably raised the hopes of many teams this year...
  9. But those picks were self-selected to match the goal (staying under the pool). If one thinks the goal should have been different (spending the overage), then citing the actual picks/goal is non-responsive. It is a little troubling that we haven't done that yet, even under a new front office with two very different draft positions (last year with a huge pool, and this year with a smaller pool and two lost picks). Also, ordering is particularly irrelevant, particularly after 10 rounds.
  10. God Only Knows why Bobby Wilson is still on the roster. Wouldn't It Be Nice if we tried Astudillo at catcher?
  11. So the current Twins chemistry should be maintained? I'd rather they prioritize talent acquisition.
  12. No point in DFA'ing Motter until you have someone else who needs the 40-man spot to join the 25-man roster.
  13. Only 2 XBH, for a .095 ISO. Did they tell him just to stop at first base on every hit?
  14. What kind of sample size is 23 inning pitched? Seems small. His overall rate with the Twins certainly hasn't improved meaningfully, across AA last year and AA/AAA/MLB this year. Also remember minor league K rates are rising just like their MLB counterparts. These kind of rates aren't all that impressive by themselves anymore.
  15. Littell's K% has not generally improved, no.
  16. I definitely agree about FV. But still it isn't hard to make a case that the upgrade from Ynoa to Littell wasn't worth $4 mil, especially to the 2017 Twins who were already looking at a glut of AAA starters and were just about to sign 2 more MLB SP too. (Note that at the time of the trade, Littell's AA dominance was for 7 starts, and Ynoa's rookie league scuffles had lasted 6 starts.) FWIW, Littell's walk rate and ground ball rate have both gotten worse since he came over to the Twins org. Not clear if that's Littell's true colors or the Twins vaunted player development machine at work.
  17. In that case, maybe they have asked but the response wasn't noteworthy? I mean, if they ask about Belisle, and Molitor or whomever says he was great for us last year and we saw some weak spots in our pen and our depth early this season that he can help shore up -- is that noteworthy? I don't think you can do much with that, unless you are an opinion columnist. In which case, you don't really need the quote anyway.
  18. It's an interesting situation. What if you know you'll get a meaningless, boilerplate response -- do you still ask the question? Can the beat guys turn that into a piece, or is that more the domain of the columnists?
  19. I think many overrated the quality difference between Ynoa and Littell. Fangraphs had them both at 40 FV, it is just that Littell was closer to the majors. But that also meant he required a 40 man spot almost immediately (as did Enns), while the Braves have at least until after the 2019 season to make that decision on Ynoa. Palacios was also a 40 FV prospect. That's pretty much equivalent to Ynoa and Littell territory. Obviously the Twins will have different evaluations, but of course those evaluations can be wrong too. Right now, still early, but it looks like we possibly lost the Littell move, given we paid $4 mil to get him and are stuck trying to evaluate him and break him into MLB at the same time as Romero, Gonsalves, Slegers, etc. Can Stewart re-join that group? Will it also cost us Felix Jorge? Etc. I don't think teams have a whole lot of reason to be forgiving of Lynn's poor start. First of all, teams were already wary of him, given his offseason market. Second, he hasn't been that great since then either -- still hasn't completed 7 innings in a start this year, and he's coming off consecutive suspect starts going into July. Hence why I think the rest of July is going to be important for him, just to see if anyone will bite at that 40 FV prospect level, and/or take on his remaining salary.
  20. It is a common estimate of the market cost of buying a win. That would be free agency, trades.
  21. Fairly fresh? 1264 innings over 9 pro seasons, including Tommy John surgery. Pretty comparable to, say, Phil Hughes over his first 9-10 pro seasons. I don't think "freshness" or "keeping in shape" really matters that much, as far as pitcher health/performance is concerned. I'm open to trading Gibson, but I doubt other teams are going to pay for him as if 2018 is his new norm. Thus, keeping him for 2019 probably has more value. Don't think I would bother with an extension yet, unless it came at a big discount (something like Hughes's initial 3/24 deal, maybe).
  22. Was Jaime Garcia not a "decent 4/5 type guy"? I just listed what he fetched last year, and his ERA at the time was over a run lower than Lynn's now, and he was averaging an extra inning-plus per start too.
×
×
  • Create New...