In their first year at High-A, Crawford had a 119 wRC+ compared to Gordon's 126 this year. Crawford is once again around the 120 range at AA and AAA this year. I get the 1 year age difference, but why is Crawford in the top 5 on most lists, with Gordon being somewhere around 50 or lower? Or maybe this is another Francisco Lindor type of player, where I look at their minor league numbers, and they're ok, but then they make it to the MLB and show why they were ranked in the top 5.