Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

TwinsDr2021

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,067
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TwinsDr2021

  1. So are you saying they would or wouldn't have signed Pressly? I am confused, sorry.
  2. How is that a safer assumption? the Twins would have been coming off a 100 win season and he would have been the stud relief pitcher. and I assume you meant stats in your last sentence, and that makes zero sense, You don't win trades with hope and promise, you win them with results, and as of now the Twins have gotten little to none in the return of results, now I have said it over and over, the Twins still have a good chance of winning this trade, but as of today they haven't.
  3. If Alcala becomes the guy you hope he becomes and the Twins are winning at a high level, then the Twins overwhelming win this trade and the FO looks like geniuses. Now I believe there is zero chance he becomes a 100-120 inning pitcher, there is probably a decent chance he becomes a 50 - 80 inning solid or better relief pitcher. (I also don't believe the players union is going to allow pitchers in their prime to be long relief pitchers and giving up millions of dollars until they fail as starters)
  4. isn't it an assumption they wouldn't have signed him? Maybe they trade him at the deadline for even better prospects the next year, Isn't everything an assumption at this point, other than what has happened? What we know is that the Houston has been in 2 of the last three world series and they resigned Pressly (see stats in my previous post) and the two prospects they Twins got haven't done anything (minus 20 good innings in a lost season with zero pressure). At this point the Twins lost this trade and it isn't even close, but the Twins have control over the prospects for a few more years and there is time for the Twins not to look horrible and even look great on this trade. But for the first three plus years the have came out on the losing end.
  5. It is crazy to think how many players that are good enough to be major league players, but are stuck in High A or AA because of the philosophy that is how it has to go? The Tigers got 2.1 WAR from Baddoo, and the Twins would have gotten a high A player maybe a AA player, not because they are so loaded in the outfield but just because.
  6. What would TB do, they would trade him, so I am against extending him. ?
  7. History says Alcala likely won't be dominant, doesn't mean it won't happen. Also the last 20 innings or so he pitched when he was pretty much lights out more than half of those innings were against terrible, terrible teams, Det, KC, Cubs, Actually if you only look at his stats all year against terrible teams, he was pretty dominant the whole season, it was really how terrible he pitched against the CHW that end up making his numbers not look really good for the whole year. You are correct nobody knows that happens with the twins in 2019 with Pressly, maybe with him they win two more games and start at home, maybe without Pressley the Astros don't win 107 and the twins end up with home field though out. At this point IMO it isn't even close how the Twins did with this trade, they have gotten destroyed, that doesn't mean at the end of this the Twins can't or won't win this trade, but as of today it is not even close. The Twins have gotten 85.1 innings, 1 save, 11 holds, and 5 blow saves, and an embarrassing 23 games by Celestino. Houston has been in 2 of the last 3 world series, Pressly has been an all start twice. pitched 162 inning with 43 saves, 45 holds and 13 blown saves. To good thing for the Twins is they traded away a relief pitcher, so if Celestino ends up being a starting MLB outfielder for a few years, the Twins will more than likely win this trade based on WAR no problem.
  8. 100% agree, without Arraez I don't see depth anywhere except maybe catcher. Since 2016 AK has played 340 games, At this point Laranch and Celestino shouldn't be counted on (Rooker?), and Miranda has never played a major league game. Lewis hasn't played in 2 years and had a .649 OPS in AA the last time he played, and Martin while having a decent enough first year certainly didn't scream skip AAA and start in the majors. To me the Twins offense depth is very similiar to their pitching depth, damn you hope most hold their own and succeed, but things could get real ugly real fast, because there really isn't anything in the pipeline after these prospects (close to being ready)
  9. How about Buxton, Sano, Rosario, or Buxton, Sano, Kepler, or Buxton Sano, Polanco. or Buxton, Sano, Hicks I feel like people might have forgotten the twins hitting prospects prior to this year.
  10. I personally believe SWR, Petty, Balazovic and maybe Steve Hajjar are too low. It usually seems that project able pitchers, that haven't proven they aren't what others hope bring the biggest returns. For example Lewis and SWR seemed like a great return at the time of the trade, but after a few months of play, it seems like a pretty good trade.
  11. IMO, they are going to send him out to first base almost everyday until somebody forces there hand to replace him. Hopefully he does so well that nobody can do that, or AK, Graver, Miranda force their hand by hitting lights out. Trading him before the season with no back up plan is reckless and a disservice to the team and fans. And the back up plan can't be we think AK will stay healthy and hit.
  12. Why does it have to be all or nothing. Why can't it be a evaluation year while still trying to be competitive? The Twins offense of predictions put them squarely in the competitive mode, so to piss that away because your trying to evaluate pitching prospects is ridiculous. Solely relying on rookie starting pitchers is going to destroy the bullpen, basically ever start the Twins will have to be prepared for the bullpen to pitch 6 plus innings. If they bring in a couple of guys that most of the time will get you to the 5th even giving up 3,4,5 runs they save the pen from be ruined by June.
  13. Nobody has suggested signing him to be an ace, have they? his WAR since 2015 (at age 22) are 2.5, .4, 1.8, 3.0, 6.1, 1.9. So assuming he is going to be around 2 to 3 WAR isn't out of the question, He will be 29 on April 7th, so it isn't like he is old, signing a 29 year old pitcher with a decent track record to 15 million dollar a year until they are 33 isn't a crazy idea. I will say signing pitchers like this every year probably isn't a winning strategy, but signing a pitcher like this when you only hope is prospects and there is plenty of payroll isn't a terrible idea either. Unless of course you are willing to concede another year of not good baseball, and I really don't think the Twins want that and I am sure ticker buyers don't either.
  14. Those are the only two options? Bring back those 3 pitchers that were terrible for the Twins last year or start the season with three minor league pitchers Duran(16 innings at AAA), SWR (53.1 innings at AA) and Balazovic (97 innings at AA) Seems like you picked two of the worst ideas for the Twins next year possible. I would prefer they bring in Duffy and/or Cueto or Pineda to start the season and ease all the prospects up.
  15. Again I am going to point out what the original author wrote. "It’s a commonly held maxim that 40 fWAR gives you a pretty consistent opportunity for October baseball. It’s a pretty basic tenet of roster construction." I guess IMO the original premise was putting together roster that had an opportunity to play October baseball not a roster to win the world series. So the need to prove that is how other teams got to around 40 fWAR is kind of irrelevant in my mind, based on this article. So with a offense/defense at 24.8, my simple math that puts needing a pitching staff at just over 15. with the current roster is short about 4, getting two midtier starting pitchers gets you around 40. Will that guarantee anything, not at all, but it is one view of constructing a roster that probably will compete for the playoffs. As currently constructed based on this logic, either the offense or pitching staff is going to have to really exceed expectations, how often does that happen with a dozen or so pitchers with little or no experience? (I don't know) To be fair I get your points, just not sure how they fit with this premise.
  16. Isn't the claim mid-tier and not top FA's? This is taken directly from the article "The Twins’ biggest mistake this offseason was not tapping into the mid-tier starting pitching free agent market, to raise the floor or the rotation. "
  17. what does Simmons missing 7 games have to do with this? Isn't it the FO that allowed Happ to pitch 98 innings with an ERA of 6.77, Shoemaker to pitch 60 innings with a 8.06 ERA, Jax to pitch 82 innings with a 6.37 ERA, Dobnak to pitch 50 innings with a 7.64 ERA, didn't this FO bring in Colome and Roblies? Isn't it this FO that left with twins with Cave as the back up center fielder if and when Buxton was going to get hurt? Yes the Twins suffered injuries, but isn't it the front office job to have a plan in place for injuries? As for the injuries to basically all of the pitching prospects, I don't know but was that unique to the Twins or did it happen all over baseball? (IMO, but no data to back this up, I think it might have to do with the pitching philosophy of going all out every pitch for 3-5 innings, after missing 2020 season that might have had a negative effect on these young arms, most of which hadn't pitched a ton of innings prior to 2020, compared to what somebody like Berrios had pitched in the minors. 30.2, 103.2, 140, 166.1 (some where on the same path as him, but 2020 messed that up)
  18. IMO the biggest mistake was the FO not giving the fans an inkling of a plan. Leaving us to speculate on what is going on, the fans that aren't fans or are skeptical of this FO complaining (with facts, predictions, history. etc..) and the fans of this FO with explaining (with facts, predictions, rationale and hope, lots and lots of hope). So coming off a couple of playoffs, followed by a season from hell, we have no real idea what is going to happen in 2022, and that IMO is the biggest mistake.
  19. Gonsalves put up pretty much identical numbers at AA when he was 21, if you take out the last 4 starts for Romero in 2017 when he apparently dealing with something, his numbers at AA where not that different and he was 22. Mejia's numbers at AA in 2015 at 22 weren't all that far off (less K's), at age 23 Meyer was pitching pretty well at AA, The rest were mostly just names, high draft picks, etc.. but also pitchers that were supposed to be part of a Twins future. I also can agree Winder will probably end up a better major league pitchers than the rest of them, my initial point was those 54 innings were just that - 54 innings at AA when you are 24. I hope he steps it up in spring training is really good for the 100-120 innings he will pitch this year and be a spring board to a successful major league career and isn't just another name the fans were dreaming would be part of a twins future rotation.
  20. Thanks and good work, they seem old for where they are ranked, I would hope to see players like this a little bit younger, but good arms no matter their age are a positive.
  21. So we are going to throw out those 4 games, velocity and command drop, not worry about it and say he is can't miss? Again I like Winder and think he will be a solid major league pitcher, but isn't using 54 innings over two year considered SSS? The guy is 25 and has no success above AA when history shows the majority of good pitchers have at least had some success or time in the majors by age 25. With that being said I hope he pitches to the most of his limited innings at the major league level this year with a bunch of success.
  22. I like Winder and probably wouldn't trade him, but you just compared 54.2 innings to a whole bunch more. Kind of cherry picked there, how about comparing AAA numbers?
  23. You are correct 24 isn't old, but he only pitched 23 innings last year, after pitching none in 2020, Having him be a starter next year, what will his innings be capped at? So his age 24 season will be stretching him out, his age 25 season you could expect with no set back to be up around 120 innings maybe? Why can't you do they same thing in MN in the bullpen and in 2023 as a possible starter if he has proved he can pitch more innings. I am just sick of listening how great the Twins prospects are, but at the same time having them in the minors and people wanting them to stay in the minors. I was saying Graterol should have been up in 2018, the dude can throw 100 why waste those pitches in the minors if he will probably end up in the pen anyway. The Same with Canterino, if he stuff is so great (which I believe it is) why not have him pitching against the best. If he has the stuff to become a starter it will work out.
  24. Meyer, May, Jay, Stewart, Gonsalves, Romero, Jorge, Thorpe, Melotakis, Slegers, Meija, all Twins prospects and besides May what have the Twins gotten for them? Couldn't trade Romero, Gonsalves or Thorpe in the late teens, because they were going to be the next set of twins starters, This is why people are OK with trading some pitching prospects.
  25. Can we stop comparing the Twins prospects to Hall of Famers. Martin will be 23 in March, Yount was playing his 6th season at 23, and was two years away from an MVP year. Would I trade Martin, sure, but it would have to be be for Major League pitcher with at least two years of control, or for a pitching prospect like Max Meyer.
×
×
  • Create New...