Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

TheLeviathan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    21,285
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    48

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TheLeviathan

  1. How many decisions do you think Molitor, or some other analytics manager, makes during the course of any game that couldn't just easily be handled by a statistician? Or someone who can read a flow-chart for decision making? I think there will still be a "manager" but it will look nothing like it does now. If this was the year 2000 and I told you nearly every FO in baseball was going to be constituted as it is today, I'd have been laughed off as a heretic. It's coming to the dugout, it already is.
  2. Well, I also consider NHL coaches in the same boat. Sports are becoming more and more about data and talent. If you have the best data and some of the best talent - you'll win. Pretty much regardless of your manager. If you don't, you won't. And since baseball is so driven by individual player matchups (unlike the NFL, NBA, and NHL) it reduces the impact of coaching in the moment. Comparing that to your average office building seems to have any number of major flaws.
  3. I would assume it's not all that different than how things are worked out regarding the hitting, pitching, bench, bullpen, and whatever other coaching titles there are. I do think you still need a point man, but I think the skill set for that person has changed a lot. Not unlike the change we've seen in FOs by the way. The idea that every FO in baseball would be packed with Stanford stat nerds and not old Terry Ryan-type scouts would've been foreign to baseball even 10-15 years ago. I think the manager position meets the same fate eventually.
  4. Wouldn't we be better off eliminating the manager position and just hiring 3-4 people who are experts at all of those jobs instead? It seems to me we still hire "baseball people" for a job that really has very little anymore to do with what happens no the field.
  5. I will take the manager job. You can pay me 150k and I can promise to be +/- 3 wins from anyone else you hire. I'll also stay true to the time honored traditions of sitting around in my pajamas all day, I know how to use a rotary phone, and I will promise to use snazzy analytics terms while also saying things like "fundamentals", "that's how we played back in my day", and "eye for an eye" if that makes you old-timers feel warm and fuzzy. Oh, and if I don't already have the job, I promise anyone related to Nick Punto will never make our team.
  6. Here is the goal for selling: Trade your human who plays baseball and you won't have for more than a few months for another human that plays baseball and you might be able to keep longer. That's it, that's the bar to meet for me. Don't sit on your hands. Don't trade them for cash. Get young baseball playing people - any really, I won't be picky - and I'll call the deadline a win.
  7. You don't know any of this. This is the kind of post about Sano that really bothers me. Buxton too. You know nothing about them as young men, what they think, what they care about, and how they work. Criticizing them as people like that is quite reprehensible IMO.
  8. The best thing to happen to Kohl Stewart was the firing of Terry Ryan and his organizational approach. Hopefully these guys can salvage this kid.
  9. Yeah the BoSox announcers suggested Gibson threw up and in on JD because he owns Gibby. So they retaliated.
  10. I'm ready to talk extension with him. Worst case scenario you have a versatile player that is very valuable to a team. What would he take? 4 years and 40M? 4/60? The more I think about it the less confident I am in my guesses.
  11. Damn that Thorpe start is nice. I think by this time next year we look at Thorpe and Graterol as our best future rotation pieces. Or at least the ones with the most upside.
  12. Parker had a good article on the pitching moves and how Molitor isn't all that out of step as some think. Poor baseball might just be the result of how many poor baseball players Molitor is forced to march out there right now. And no, I think he's much lower than the COO. I think a baseball manager is much more like a secretary/office manager. Or a figurehead. They simply don't have enough pull in FO decisions and their in-game decisions have been largely neutered as well.
  13. I don't think the manager in baseball is the manager of the organization. He's more like a "team lead". If even that. Probably closer to an office manager who organizes things, sets schedules, answers questions, etc. Are those people valuable? Sure, absolutely. Do I think firing one is going to make Steve in Accounting any better at accounting? Probably not. I do put stock into the value of a good clubhouse, but I think the coaching staff as a group can set that tone. (Which is why I could see an organization switching away from a single manager to a specialized group of guys to manage) Or the owner. Or the Front Office. Or all of them together. And whatever clubhouse culture they set up is completely beyond our ability to judge because we see next to none of it. I don't see any signs that Twins players are miserable and not having fun and that they hate Molitor. Do you?
  14. He's human, willing to work 162 nights a year (including weekends), knows how to use antiquated phone system, good at slapping people on the back, can copy names accurately. So, like the other 29 guys.
  15. I personally like manager with bad record - “not enough talent, not his fault” I personally don’t like manager with poor record - “everything is his fault, talent is irrelevant” I hope we give Molitor a lifetime deal or fire him just to save some of you from your own posts.
  16. Rogers and Hildy getting back to what we expected would do a world of good for this team.
  17. That was a great post with criticism. It was fair and well argued. I'd suggest a lot of what you mean by this "magic touch" idea is really just luck. I'm not sure Molitor, or anyone else, has a whole lot of control over that. It's not like Terry Francona suddenly forgot to manage a bullpen this year. The Cubs are at the bottom of the league in fielding, is that because Joe Maddon has lost his touch on where he plays guys? Or had a fundamentals breakdown?
  18. Good question. It would not shock me if in the next 20 years some team did away with the manager role as we know it.
  19. Frankly, I think the next dog you see could manage a baseball team to about 2 less wins than Maddon. That's how much I think of the position in the current baseball context. If Molitor is fired or retained I think it's largely irrelevant.
  20. Yes, less than 10 posts ago that was dragged out.
  21. I'm pretty sure I clearly indicated how I appreciate Nick's criticism. So...no. Isn't this the same kind of complete disregard for comprehending a post you often complain about? Be critical with evidence. And consider context. Parker's post on the bullpen stuff has seemingly been ignored but is pretty important to consider. But "Tom Kelly would've X" is immediately a really, really bad argument.
×
×
  • Create New...