Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

old nurse

Verified Member
  • Posts

    7,371
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by old nurse

  1. Graterol starting once a week. There is a 26 man roster. He can be 26. In terms of being a fifth starter consider that only 89 piitchers last year had 130 IP in the major leagues. Things do have a way of working out.
  2. http://www.startribune.com/twins-dozier-lynn-and-duke-on-trading-block-as-deadline-nears/489458211/ Nobody reports what the Twins offer was. Maybe less, maybe more. Once traded the offer is gone. You could claim he gave Arzona a discount because he liked so many things, felt like he was a team leader, or something else. Claims without evidence are easy to come by.
  3. There is something that is being ignored here. Terry Ryan is not running the club anymore. The new front office has roots in a system that has developed pitchers. Sabathia, Roberto Hernandez had a couple of great seasons, Carrasco, Kluber, Salazar, Clevinger, Beiber. Now maybe Plutko, Plesac or Civale. Westbrook and Bauer came over as rookies and developed. One would think a person working in baseball operation would have picked up on how the system works and develops pitchers.
  4. The mortgage of the future to win in the present is not proven. The trade for Cueto cost them no future value. What they gave up for Davis and Shields may not equal the production of them as Royals plus Soler. The players cited as signed were gone before the star contracts came due. Sean Mamaea was not going to carry a team from bottom feeder to contender.
  5. Talent on paper is pretty useless. The results of this talent after 3-5 years has been inconsistent or non existent Chicago's infield defense is worse than the Twins Keuchel may have a problem
  6. Regression can be a brutal thing. Last year the White Sox got career years out of Giolito, Moncada, Anderson, McCann and Beckham. They still won only 71 games. Luis Robert and Madrigal could be the real deal to add to the mix with Grandal. Is that 15 games better? The same regression that the fans here say can happen to the Twins players can nappen in Chicago.
  7. Rosenthal reports it is believed the Twins and the Nationals have 4 year offers out to Donaldson. one may be as high as 100 million
  8. The five young pitchers Alcal Duran, Graterol, Balazovic and Colina have thrown about 100 innings in a year. Not quite ready for starters for a full big league season. An optimistic outlook is for 3 of them to develop their pitches and ability to use them develop over the year for a lights out bullpen for the playoffs.
  9. Under the radar player who has done nothing but done well. Edwar Colina comes up.
  10. Hamilton has 7 years in the big leagues to have a career WPA of -7.75.
  11. The whole team needs to take a step forward in some facet. For the three listed, Berrios was taken out after 4 innings in the most important game of the year.. The season should be planned to end in late October. Buxton needs to stay healthy. Kepler, IDK if he could have done more during the season. He disappeared in the playoffs. Nelson Cruz and Garver arehe only 2 players that really can't improve from last year's team. The rest all need to get better. Here is the proof. https://www.baseball-reference.com/postseason/2019_ALDS2.shtml
  12. Relievers still have a future at 32, fringe starters do not. As a starter it is easy to see why you would pass on him. As a reliever, he would be Rochester shuttle material.
  13. Littell seemed to have figured something out in AA that year. I don't think it would be an incorrect observation that at the time there was not a whole lot of pitching prospects in the organization that were near major league ready. They maybe could have got him in the rule v draft. Maybe not. If over the next 4 years he is a good set up pitcher then the trade is a good one. I don't think it was a bad one. Garcia was not a long term solution, nor a short term one. The 4 million was wasted anyways. Garcia had a decent run in St. Louis. Nobody kept him long after he was traded the first time. To get anything for him was a plus. In trading Ynoa, they were giving up on a prospect while he still had some value. Like Littell he has some talent but has not reached it. It will still take a couple years to see if it was a good trade or not.
  14. They got Cash from Atlanta, Not revisionist history but an omission. Revisionist history is thet the Yankees were going to DFA a player not even on the 40 man roster.
  15. Smak and Bird are the types of free agents teams loke the Royals should persue on one year deals. Cheap players that if they do not rebound you can cut, if they do well you can trade to a contender needing a bat
  16. Prospect valuations by the teams are getting better. Except for the Cubs there isn't the star prospect being traded very often. The Sale trade for Moncada, but . Dombrowski isn't a GM anymore. It really shouldn't be a "what if" concern on prospects. If you think their ceiling is going to be met.
  17. Upside, downside. Free agents will have years they are not worth the money. There are more stories like Cueto and Zimmerman than Scherzer. Trades for linepitchers viewed are top of the rotation the same way. Gray and Archer come to mind There really isn't an option not worth trying.
  18. In the coming back mode, from June to suspension Pneda had a fip of 3.15. If that is who he can be and he is a 3-4 starter, good luck finding 3 better pitchers to fill out your rotation
  19. The problem with the plan is that the projection numbers have been way off.
  20. A trade for a top of the order starter there will be more open roster spots. Position flexibility had been a buzz word. I don't think they will add a 1b only player. Rule V will have a selection. There is always somebody to love out there. There is always a high ceiling fixer upper out there. At worse they are returned, just like most selections are.
  21. Two of the pitchers are pretty much in 2019 who they are, The orher one the question is "Is that what he has become?"
  22. There is no shortage of highly touted pitchers who become less than what they were predicted to be. There are plenty that cost you no prospects. The Orioles did well to land the prospects. On the other side of the coin. The Angels are pitching starved. Why are the giving up on prospects for the back of the rotation? I don't thinl either team is going to win this trade
  23. Treinen was used over 80 innings in 2018. Not many relievers have good seasons the following year. Justin Wilson in a similar career arc got a 2/10 deal. It would be fair to say that Trienen is no Wilson in terms of talent, so it would be fair to say 10 million would be a steal for him, Otovino numbers would be more the high end at 9 million a year. 7.5 million or so does not seam unreasonable yet since seasons end Oakland couldn't even trade him for .195 A ball hitter. There is something wrong here that bears some watching. I am not recalling an Oakland player that was very good being let go for nothing.
  24. Franmklin Barrto, Sean Nolin, Brett Lawrie and Kendal Graveman. or their equivalent. 3 prospects with a high ceiling the team is not in love with but somebody else is and a mlb player with potential. Rosario, not Buxton is the mlb player Prospect wise I don't know.
×
×
  • Create New...