This is a topic that has come up a few times since June of last year, and especially in this thread. The majority opinion seems to be (Disclaimer: This is my interpretation, so if it’s inaccurate, then my apologies) that Falvey’s offseason strategy is “insanity” or “unsustainable” or, in simple terms, “bad.” This is the most common depiction of Falvey’s supposed offseason strategy that I see particularly on TD: “Sign leftovers and pray for a bounceback year.” This seems like a pretty accurate depiction (I would word it a bit differently) but what I have trouble understanding is why this strategy is necessarily a bad one. As I said, I would word the depiction a bit differently: “Identify low-priced options that have tools that we can work with and improve.” (obviously referring to pitchers)
To me, this doesn’t seem like a terrible strategy as long as you can make it work. The Twins did make it work in many ways in 2020 (Wisler, Thielbar, etc) and it completely flopped in 2021 (Colome, Shoemaker, etc). To me it seems like one year it worked out and one year it didn’t, so the results are mixed.
Is this strategy necessarily “bad?” What are your thoughts?