Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

rv78

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,894
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by rv78

  1. Headline should read "Bullpen Implodes Again". Even Rogers has been getting lit up albeit being overused by Baldelli. Wonder what the Twins record would be if they had a legitimate closer?
  2. Sano, Buxton, Rosario, Kepler, Polanco. All came up to the big league roster about the same time. Sano and Buxton were the two that were suppose to be the "Stars" of the bunch. As it turns out they have been the worst of the bunch with Sano leading the way. I keep comparing him to David Ortiz and wonder if the Twins trade him will he become just that, another David Ortiz? How long do you keep a player that just can't figure out you don't have to try to hit every ball 500 feet. Maybe they should have him practice bunting so he learns that putting the bat on the ball is more productive.
  3. I disagree. He's way over-rated. His BA is .244 and OBP is .321. Very much average to possibly below average. One could argue that he has taken AB's away from Adrianza, Astudillo and Cave. All 3 can cover any position that Marwin has played and they are just as good offensively and defensively as he is. I also think Baldelli is using him too much and not playing his regulars enough. With scheduled off-days the only guys that need added rest are catchers and those who get banged up running into walls or with a nagging injury. Tell me that Adrianza, Astudillo, Cave, Tyler Austin or even Luis Arraez wouldn't be playing as well or better than Marwin if they'd been given the chance to play almost everyday like he has? Sorry, I don't understand the infatuation with an average player just because he can play multiple positions. He reminds me of Denny Hocking, a super utility player that was never good enough to own a position.
  4. We've been down the try to "manufacture a run" and "pitch to contact" roads before.... they produced ZERO championships.
  5. Giving catchers the credit for winning games based on pitch calling is pure BS. A lot of pitches are called from the bullpen and relayed to the catcher and a lot of pitches are shaken off by the pitcher. Most pitchers know what they want to throw and when. The majority of the time the signs from the catcher are just to get both he and the pitcher on the same page so the catcher knows what is coming.
  6. I'll once again repeat... This team was built to compete, not win. There is a difference. They will beat the poorer teams in the league, compete against the average teams in the league and lose against the best teams in the league. They have 1 good arm in the bullpen to rely on. Rogers. After that it's a crap shoot. And the crap has already hit the fan.
  7. Agree 100%. Attendance dropping from 3.2M to 1.9M should give any common sense owner that whatever it is you are doing.. it is wrong! From the price of admission to $10 beers, $6 hotdogs and a losing team why would anyone RUSH to Target Field? Oh the new monthly pricing is great for the local fans in the Twin cities but for those of us that live too far away to come to that many games how does that help us? It doesn't! Guess he doesn't realize that some of his fan base is outside the city limits. With the high cost of admission and concessions the average Joe's like myself won't be coming to any games to watch a team of losers. We want our moneys worth if we make the trip, so prove you have a team on the field that can win and not just compete, yes there is a difference. Then the fans will start coming back.
  8. Poor attendance was due to: 1.It was cold. 2.They were playing a team that has no aspirations of competing this year and aren't very good so the fans figured it would be an easy 4 game sweep. 3.The front office has no committment to winning, only competing, yes there's a difference. 4.Tyler Duffey joined the team instead of Craig Kimbrel. 5.Twins fans already know this team is going no where. 6.All of the above!
  9. Wasn't a fan of the Marwin signing and still aren't. Would rather see Astudillo getting those reps at 3B, Austin getting them at 1B and Cave getting them in the OF. The Marwin signing hurt this team more than it helped it. Now Baldelli feels the need to use him and the youngsters that we already had to cover those spots get pushed back, or even worse in Austin's case get DFA'd.
  10. Castro is a lot like Buxton was last year. Good defensively but can't hit, and has never been an offensive player. Simple fix.......... Trade Castro. I'd much rather watch Astudillo play than Castro any day of the week.
  11. This season seems to me to be one that the Twins could be any of 3 things. 1.They take the next step and take the central by storm with over-whelming performances by their entire team. 2.They perform at an average level again and fail to accomplish anything more than the same mediocrity that we have become accustomed to. 3.They fall flat on their face as the new aquisitions don't help lift the team as expected and instead of competing for the division title they try to stay above the other last place club in the division.
  12. Was not a big fan of him before the trade and still not. Cave, Astudillo, Adrianza, and Austin can do everything Gonzalez can do.
  13. Been a fan of the Schoop signing since before it was done. Dozier didn't break any records with his OBP either so we aren't losing anything there. Guessing he will bat in the 6 or 7 spot in the lineup so his lower OBP doesn't hurt a lot. Good article! Thanks!
  14. You covered it. Astros don't need an average utility player when you sign someone better to play everyday. I wanted the Twins to go after Brantley and once again they settle for the leftovers.
  15. Thanks for the play by play. Now I won't have to watch this season.
  16. I don't think you trade one of your top prospects for a catcher. Every catcher in the league is only 1 pitch away from a concussion. Look what it did to Mauer. He was never the same afterwards. It's just too risky to expect a Realmuto or anyone else to be in your lineup almost every day for the next 2,3,4 or more years and produce like one of the top 3 or 4 prospects in your system could.
  17. I totally disagree. It is not the "smart bet" but instead the SAFE BET they are playing. The smart bet would be to pull in some real talent that is proven from the outside either thru Free Agency or via trade and THEN IF Buxton and Sano live up to their expectations you have a juggernaut. The way they are playing it with the wait and see approach only proves to me their lack of committment to fielding a winning team.
  18. "I remember when Shannon Stewart was traded for and made a big difference, when we brought in Chili Davis, and Torrii Hunter to push the other players. Maybe that is what we are doing with Cruz. But the real question is - would you sign Harper or Machado if they were willing to come here? Or would you tell them to hang out for a year or two until we are a better team?" Last time I checked Shannon Sharpe played football. Morris was the best and it was only because of the timing. The Twins needed an Ace and got him. Molitor was good but never took them to the promised land. As for signing a Star, if the approach is to only go after the star when you are already good and we aren't doing it now, that speaks loudly on how they feel about this team in 2019. And it also says, nothing about this organization has changed since 1991 when they went out and got Jack Morris. So much for Target Field and the increased revenue allowing the Twins to be competitive in the Free Agent market.
  19. Machado is only worth 2 to 3 more wins to this club? I think you are miscalculating somewhere. His power alone would add 3 times that. Polonco might hit right with him for average but HR and RBI's Machado has a huge edge. That means run production. Run Production means winning games.
  20. “We’ve added to this team,” Falvey said. “We don’t look at this as a rebuilding team. We look at this as a group that, if all those things come together with our young players — that we are putting all kinds of resources around to ensure that happens — if that happens, along with some adds we’ve made, we’re going to continue to have flexibility moving forward. This pretty much sums up their committment to fielding a winning team. The 2 biggest words in this response are "IF" and "IF". What "IF" "IF" doesn't happen? He covers his butt by adding "we’re going to continue to have flexibility moving forward." Is that really being committed to winning? No, it's not knowing what you have and knowing "IF" what you've been doing will work. Comparing your team to an Oakland or Milwaukee just because they succeeded doesn't mean yours will. Last time I checked the Twins don't have the same players.
  21. Pretty obvious there is no committment to winning when you have money on the table to use, top talent available to acquire, and you walk away. Your grades are generous. Schoop and Cruz should help improve the team but they aren't difference makers. The other 3, Cron, Parker, Perez are cheap alternatives to what could and should have been major upgrades. 5 new additions that will not take them to the next level. Looks to me like they are banking on the in-house talent to come through or playing another season of "wait till next year". I'd give 'em a grade of "D" for player acquisitions, "C" for coaching additions simply because there is little to NO big league experience for any of the guys you mentioned, and an "F-" for resource allocations. Overall off-season performance grade = "D".
  22. Sign 'em both and make me believe in the Twins again. That's why we were told we needed Target Field. Otherwise shut up!
  23. The last line in this post is so TRUE. However it would also be very safe to just say "The Twins will never out-spend New York, LA, Houston and Boston". So, winning is a moot point.
  24. This move ranks right up there with the Matt Belisle addition.
  25. Another article about payroll and the Twins. Who would have thought? The Twins even with the opening of Target Field have a limited amount of revenue. You said it yourself, without a big TV contract that's the way it is. So, the biggest question then is HOW DO THE TWINS GET A BIG TV CONTRACT? The answer is not just from winning but probably more so from fielding the best team that you can, every year. Why would anyone want to sponser them or any Team for that matter when you have money to spend to make your Team better and you don't even try? The Twins are notorius for being CHEAP! The top Free Agents always go somewhere else because the Twins don't commit to winning or even fielding the best team that they can.
×
×
  • Create New...