Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
  • Posts

    32,672
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    328

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brock Beauchamp

  1. Also, look at your own argument. Yes, the Diamondbacks made it to the World Series. But they lost. And who'd they lose to? One of the most free-spending teams of the past three offseasons.
  2. Spending money is one way to win. It's not the only way. But not spending money decreases your options to field a winning team. Overall, spending money increases a team's chance at both the postseason and the World Series. It's not the only way to get there but it's one way to get there. And the more options you have to a path there, the better you'll be in the long run.
  3. The Angelos were terrible owners, some of the worst in the sport and that's saying something. Thankfully, they're now gone.
  4. I'm unhappy with ownership's decision to reduce payroll in the middle of a contention window and I won't tell anyone to feel otherwise. But if you think the Pohlads are bad when viewed on the scale of baseball ownership, you're not paying attention to the rest of baseball. The Pohlads are entirely adequate owners. I can rattle off a dozen ownership groups that are markedly worse than them.
  5. I couldn't take it any more. I fixed the title.
  6. Fixed this for you, Ash
  7. Oh, the Twins could have bid on Bellinger but in the end, the Cubs would have just bid more. And if you get to the point where you've outbid the Cubs on Bellinger, you've probably really screwed up.
  8. Eh, also true but mostly irrelevant. The Cubs have more money and more need, they were ultimately going to land Bellinger. No one was strongly linked to him other than the North Siders for about four months.
  9. He opted for a Correa-style deal, which is something of a surprise. Kudos to the Cubs for holding firm on their ceiling. Bellinger landed exactly where everyone thought he would land. The Twins never had a shot at him.
  10. Game thread is going to be here, folks:
  11. I don't disagree with the principle of this blog entry but I think it's worth pointing out that other baseball costs have risen dramatically over the past 15 years. Minor leaguers are paid *way* more now (good), front offices are *much* larger, investment in tech and infrastructure is much higher, the list goes on... It takes a lot more revenue to run all the non-payroll parts of a major league franchise than it did in the past. With that said, all we have to do is look at the Braves, the only team that has a legal responsibility to open their books to the public. And they're wildly profitable. Costs have risen, to be sure, but so have profits.
  12. I don't think the two things are linked. I think the Twins are out on Bellinger for purely monetary reasons. Personally, I'm okay with that. Bellinger is a lefty hitter - god knows the Twins don't need more of those in the OF - and I don't trust his bat to play at first at that elevated dollar amount. He just isn't a great fit here, IMO.
  13. John Fisher's current strategy of relocating the Oakland Athletics:
  14. I watched Santana a lot with the Brewers last year. He's going to start declining at literally any minute but he's still capable of taking good, professional at-bats from both sides of the plate. He also plays a nice first base. His numbers won't light up the room but he's the kind of guy you're very comfortable putting in the 5-7 spots depending on matchup.
  15. I'm with Matt on this one, the Pirates don't stand much of a chance. The Reds and Brewers have as much young talent as they do and are starting off with a higher floor. The Cubs roster will not look the same on Opening Day as it does now. And the Cardinals..., well, they're the ****ing Cardinals.
  16. In some ways, yes. But guys fall in almost every draft and they took advantage of it. Whereas with Jenkins, it was a rock solid top five draftees, the Twins lucked out in the lottery, and Jenkins was the only guy out of the five left to draft. It was as close to the decision making itself for you as it can get.
  17. The front office deserves a lot of credit for a variety of things. I don't think they're perfect but they seem to be doing a pretty damned good job. With that said, they absolutely lucked into Walker Jenkins in so many freakin' ways.
  18. Oh, for sure. Ortiz fits right into the Brewers' needs, just as Lee would.
  19. This ignores the Brewers’ needs, though. They have outfielders up and down the roster and are trying to compete. It’s no coincidence that the players coming back are both MLB ready and are a pitcher and a shortstop. If I was in the Brewers position, I would have asked for Lee and not moved off that position. He’s an absolutely perfect fit for them right now.
  20. Absolutely. I’m open to trading Lee but the player needs to have more control years.
  21. Not even a little bit true. Two fringy top-100 guys who are MLB ready and a late first round pick. Could the Twins have beat that? Sure. Do you want to trade Brooks Lee for one year of Burnes?
  22. Lee/Varland is a better offer than what the Brewers got and likely the asking price from the Brewers (or slot Raya/Festa in for Varland). I don't think the Twins had the right pieces to get a deal done because the Brewers would likely demand Lee, who is an overpay for one year of Burnes. If the Twins traded for Burnes, I was hoping it would be a Burnes/Wiemer for Lee+.
  23. Our newest partner site, Fish On First, has been covering the series comprehensively. Good stuff. https://fishonfirst.com/search/?&type=cms_records21&tags=caribbean series&search_and_or=or
  24. There are serious questions about Bellinger. I wouldn't want my team to sign him for more than four years and it's almost certainly going to take more than that.
×
×
  • Create New...