Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Brock Beauchamp

Site Manager
  • Posts

    32,403
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    328

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Brock Beauchamp

  1. God, all Vargas needs to do to earn a spot on this team is be something approaching competent against LHP.
  2. I knew he was traded, had no idea for what. Had to look it up.
  3. Trade to the Mariners for Stephen Pryor.
  4. The guy is a freakshow and I can't tell if he's a gimmick or legitimately good. I can't recall the last time I've seen a guy just change arm angles at will and throw some of the same pitches with very different movement.
  5. Yeah, so, Hildenberger. This kid is okay.
  6. Well, sure, we'd all like Sano at third more often. I don't think that's really a controversial statement. When he went down with the fluke shin injury, Miguel was on pace for about ~105 games at third. A little lower than I'd like to see but not that far off a 120 game pace.
  7. Dunno, I'm pretty close on both of them. Kepler has the advantage of age, defensive ability (which seems to be better than Rosario this year, and Max can cover CF better than Eddie), and polish/discipline. Rosario has the advantage of L/R splits, pure hitting ability, and current performance. I suspect they end up as similarly valuable players but get there very differently. I still believe Kepler probably has the higher ceiling, as it's hard to argue with plate discipline, especially as a player enters their prime.
  8. Was just going to say something similar. Guys who can grip a pitch and send it into the stands with regularity should do what Rosario did last night. Guys like Grossman and Mauer should stick to the approach that makes them successful.
  9. True, the front of the rotation was better in 1987 but the entire pitching staff was bleh in the ALCS. The Twins won through a bit of dumb luck and some really mediocre pitching. They hit their way to the WS (where the pitching staff improved a bit). And that's my point, really. Both the 1987 and the 2017 teams match up pretty closely. A strong offense and meh pitching. But the road to a World Series championship is a lot harder in 2017. The Twins need 12 wins to get there versus just eight in 1987.
  10. Not really. The 1987 team's pitching staff was pedestrian (99 ERA+) and not terribly different than this season (96 ERA+). Whereas this year's offense (103 OPS+) is actually slightly better than the 1987 squad (97 OPS+). The 1987 squad simply wasn't very good. They got lucky and hot at the right time in an era when eight wins nets you a championship.
  11. It appears random variance, at least from a glance. Archer has been relatively consistent with FIP/ERA over the course of his career and the Rays are a good defensive team.
  12. FIP versus ERA. Archer is underperforming his FIP by almost three-quarters of a run this season.
  13. Agreed. This team is good/decent. My point is more that "good/decent" teams can go on short losing streaks pretty easily (hell, even very good teams can do this on occasion, see the Dodgers), especially teams that rely on offense as much as the Twins do. But with a bunch of teams with middling/good records, any one of them could turn hot or cold over 15 games, which would define their season. That's my concern; not that the Twins are vastly inferior to anyone else competing for the WC spot.
  14. Thankfully, three of those teams are in the AL West and they all play each other down the stretch. That decreases the odds of going on a tear and passing the Twins.
  15. This team managed to get though something like ten games in nine days and did pretty well IIRC. And they did it in August with a 25 man roster. I'm not worried about the games played or the opponents. I'm simply not convinced this team is very good, which can result in short losing stretches (to be fair, they're not very bad either)
  16. By which metric? Not arguing, legitimately curious. Radke was underrated but top 30 seems pretty high to me.
  17. No, he didn't. He said "name one pitcher that is a 4/5"...
  18. Palka is a left-handed batter who finished his AAA season with a .759 OPS. There's no place for him on a team that's trying to win in September. Granite/Palka would be a huge downgrade from Rosario/Grossman. You gain a little defense with Granite but lose a ton of offense. With Palka, you probably remain defensively neutral (Palka might be worse than Grossman) but again, likely lose quite a bit of offense.
  19. Neither Carew nor Mauer have/had a negative season of fWAR so it's a moot point.
  20. Hard to call Smith "rounded". He was stellar at two skills (defense and baserunning) and pretty bad at the rest. edit: huh, never realized Smith was as disciplined a hitter as he was.
  21. Just for fun, here's a comparison using bWAR: Mike Piazza had a career best bWAR of 8.7 in 1997. Ivan Rodriguez had a career best bWAR of 6.5, also in 1997. Which player had the better season? It's not as easy as just spitting out a number, as Pudge was one of the all-time greats behind the dish while Piazza was one of the all-time jokes behind the dish.
  22. Weird stat to note about Escobar. While his 2015 and 2017 seasons look very similar in BA, OBP, and SLG, how he got there is really strange. 2015: 31 2B, 4 3B, 12 HR 2017: 13 2B, 4 3B, 15 HR *scratches head*
×
×
  • Create New...