Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    What Should the Twins Do With Jordan Balazovic?


    Cody Schoenmann

    With the Twins annual end-of-season 40-man roster reconstruction on the horizon, they will be forced to make tough decisions on who to release and who to add. One of the more fascinating players who may be affected by the 40-man roster reconstruction is former top prospect Jordan Balazovic. What should the Twins do with him?

    Image courtesy of Kelley L Cox - USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    After thanking players, coaching staff, and fans, the first line of action the Twins front office makes upon the conclusion of the season is the annual 40-man roster cleanse or reconstruction. Typically, around five to seven players on the 40-man roster are placed on waivers. Upon being placed on waivers, these players can be claimed by a different organization, outrighted to Triple-A, or released. 

    Around this time last season, the Twins placed Jake Cave, Jermaine Palacios, Caleb Hamilton, Devin Smeltzer, and Jhon Romero on waivers, removing them from the 40-man roster.

    Cave, Palacios, and Hamilton were eventually claimed by different organizations, and Smeltzer and Romero were assigned to Triple-A. Following the World Series, Smeltzer and Romero became minor-league free agents, and none of the five players listed played for the Twins in 2023. 

    Organizations undergo these rather substantial roster purges to open up 40-man roster spots to add minor-league players they don’t want to subject to the Rule 5 Draft and because they need space to make trades or sign free agents. 

    With Sonny Gray, Dallas Keuchel, Kenta Maeda, Tyler Mahle, Emilio Pagán, Donovan Solano, Joey Gallo, and Michael A. Taylor set to become free agents once the 2023 season officially concludes, the Twins will have eight 40-man roster spots opened up initially.

    Matt Canterino, José De León, Jovani Moran, Oliver Ortega, Jose Miranda, and Nick Gordon must also be activated from the 60-day IL once the 2023 season concludes. So, with eight players entering free agency and six being activated from the 60-day IL, the Twins will have two 40-man roster spots available before they begin their reconstruction.

    Having two roster spots available is a suitable start. Regardless, the Twins will need to open up more spots to add Rule 5 Draft-eligible minor leaguers to the 40-man roster to avoid the possibility of them getting poached by other teams. The Twins front office has been one of the more active groups in the last three offseasons, so they will need to make space to fulfill any future free-agent signings or trades.

    Waiving Cave, Palacios, Hamilton, Smeltzer, and Romero were relatively uncontroversial and obvious moves to make last season. Regardless, this season, the upcoming decision the Twins front office is tasked to make will be much more complex.

    To illustrate how the Twins will be forced to make complicated decisions, let’s look at which members of the Twins’ 40-man roster are potential candidates to be waived:

    The vast majority of players listed are relief pitchers who would fulfill the Twins’ eighth bullpen spot that tends to be given to a young pitcher who is a viable stretch relief option that can be used in an emergency to eat up innings. During the 2023 regular season, Sands, Headrick, or Winder often occupied this role. 

    Though these types of pitchers are interchangeable and replaceable in theory, the pitchers listed above did an adequate job, and their spots on the Twins’ 40-man roster likely aren’t in jeopardy.

    That being said, there is a young pitcher on the 40-man roster who doesn’t fit that description, and that pitcher is once-prized Twins’ prospect Jordan Balazovic. 

    Balazovic made his Twins debut in 2023, appearing in relief against the Detroit Tigers on June 18. In his debut, Balazovic faced 13 batters through 3 2/3 innings pitched and helped the Twins get through a blowout loss without unnecessarily expending their high-leverage relievers.

    Though Balazovic played the role of stretch reliever in his Major League debut, he quickly became part of the mid-to-high leverage short reliever mix, not throwing more than one inning of relief in his subsequent five appearances. 

    Balazovic performed admirably during his first taste as a short reliever with the Twins. To add context to how well he performed, here are Balazovic’s numbers from June 18 to July 24.

    • 14 innings pitched, 56 total batters faced, 1.29 ERA, 4.54 FIP, 4.46 xFIP, 12 hits, two earned runs, two home runs, four walks, ten strikeouts, 6.4 K/9, 2.6 BB/9, .250 BABIP, 100 LOB%, 13.3 HR/FB% 

    On the surface, Balazovic performed very well, as shown by his impressive 1.29 ERA through 56 total batters faced, but his underlying metrics told a different story.

    Balazovic’s FIP, which, according to Fangraphs, illustrates what a player’s ERA would look like over a given period of time if the pitcher were to have experienced league-average results on balls in play and league-average timing, was 4.54 during that period of time. 

    Combining Balazovic's high FIP, 6.43 K/9, and substantially below average HR/FB% of 13.3%, he was due for robust regression, which is precisely what happened. 

    On July 27, Balazovic had a rather implosive relief outing in which he gave up three earned runs after facing just seven batters in 1 1/3 innings pitched against the Seattle Mariners.

    Many of Balazovic's future performances had similar outcomes, and from July 26 through August 19, Balazovic pitched to an 8.71 ERA, 8.00 FIP, and 21.4% HR/FB% before getting demoted to the Triple-A St. Paul Saints on August 19.  

    Balazovic didn't make another appearance for the Twins in the regular or postseason and ended his rookie season with a lackluster 4.44 ERA and 6.01 FIP through 24 1/3 innings pitched.

    The season has reached its conclusion, and the Twins find themselves in a complicated position as they need to decide if they want to keep Balazovic on the 40-man roster or replace him with a Rule 5 Draft-eligible minor league player who has a greater chance of positively contributing to the team in the near-to-distant future, or a free agency or trade acquisition further down the line. 

    Before we decide the best route the Twins could take with Balazovic and his future with the team, let's first identify which minor league players are Rule 5 Draft-eligible.

    Here are the noteworthy minor league players that could realistically get poached by a different franchise in the Rule 5 Draft:

    Of the minor leaguers listed, the only players guaranteed to be added to the 40-man roster are Martin, Rodriguez, Camargo and, more likely than not, Severino.

    The "bubble" players who could realistically get added are Keirsey, Olivar, Prato, Helman, Laweryson, and Williams. Many of these players are already in Triple-A. The players listed could potentially contribute for the Twins immediately. Even so, there is the possibility that no other teams would claim them, meaning the Twins could keep them in the organization without using a 40-man roster spot. 

    Salas and Sabato won't be added to the 40-man roster. Although Salas is too young and underdeveloped for any Major League team to add them to their 26-man roster, Sabato may get claimed by a non-contending team like the Oakland Athletics or Kansas City Royals. 

    The Twins will find a way to get Martin, Rodriguez, Camargo and likely Severino and Keirsey Jr. on the 40-man roster. To get these five players on the roster, the Twins could part ways with relatively expendable players, and the once-prized prospect Balazovic could be one of the players.

    When deciding which three and potentially more players the Twins will waive, we must determine which players on the 40-man roster are more valuable than others, and much of that can be determined by opportunity and potential. 

    Based on the opportunity given to them by the Twins and their potential, Woods Richardson, Headrick, Sands, Canterino, and Winder appear to be locks to be on the 40-man roster next season.

    So, after using deductive reasoning, that leaves us with Luplow, Stevenson, De León, Alcala, Moran, Henriquez, Ortega, Gordon, and Balazovic as the top candidates to be expunged from the 40-man roster.

    Of the nine players listed, here is where I believe they stand in likelihood of being waived to make room for Rule 5 Draft-eligible players:

    (*1 is most likely and 9 is least likely)

    1. Luplow
    2. Gordon
    3. De León
    4. Ortega
    5. Balazovic
    6. Henriquez
    7. Moran
    8. Stevenson
    9. Alcala

    With the Twins likely adding five Rule 5 Draft-eligible players to the 40-man roster and needing space to execute trades and sign free agents, it might be in their best interest to place Balazovic on waivers to make space. However, four or five players are seemingly more likely to be waived before him.

    Luplow, Gordon, and De León feel like the most obvious players the Twins could waive, but the two provide a veteran presence and potential to contribute to a playoff-hopeful 26-man roster. The Twins front office, known for valuing veteran depth pieces, could realistically keep the two, leaving Ortega, Henriquez, Moran, and Balazovic more susceptible.

    Stevenson contributed toward the Twins' postseason run and was a member of the 26-man playoff roster, so it appears the Twins are inclined to keep him around for the time being. Alcala seems to be part of the Twins rotation plans going forward, so he likely won't be waived either.

    Balazovic was once an MLB.com top-100 prospect on the verge of being a core member of the Twins starting rotation for seasons to come. Unfortunately, after undergoing unfortunate injuries, off-field issues, and poor performance at Triple-A and the Major Leagues, Balazovic has quickly become an expendable asset on the Twins' 40-man roster. 

    The Twins' annual 40-man roster reconstruction will soon occur. With the Twins needing to create roster spots to add Rule 5 Draft-eligible players in prevention of them getting poached by other teams and the need to create roster spots to manufacture trades and sign free agents, the Twins could realistically waive Balazovic among other players to create the necessary space needed.

    What do you think of Balazovic's future with the Twins? Should the Twins waive him to create space on the 40-man roster? Comment below. 

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    50 minutes ago, HerbieFan said:

    My opinion, which if you have it and a buck you can get a cup of coffee at the 7-11, is that Balezovic needs to be returned to starting.  Doesn't seem like his stuff plays up in a bullpen role.  In the 'pen he's just a guy.  Injuries derailed the development as a starter.  I'd like to see him given one more year there.

    He is out of options. Would you make him the number 5 starter? Would you DFA him in hopes of getting him through waivers and then start him in AAA?

    A whole lot to unpack in this article.  It really is 2 articles, if not more, in 1.  First, the who will get DFA.  Of the 9 listed, I believe Stevenson will be higher up on the list than the writer thinks.  He is not young, only made the MLB roster as a defense and base stealing gun.  Unless you think you will want him to actually play meaningful innings in outfield you do not keep him on the roster.  My guess he gets DFA along with Luplow.  De Leon I also agree is out the door.  Those 3 free up enough room to get the locks of E-Rod, Martin, Carmango and Servrino, all locks, and room to add 1 more, unless they want to sit at 39 for awhile, like having room to draft in rule 5. 

    The next is who else should get added to 40 man, and who would you cut.  It is much easier to expose someone to rule 5 draft than DFA.  The reason is the rules on how they move on.  Position players are rarely taken in rule 5, unless they are near MLB players, or taken by clearly rebuilding teams that will take poor play for a year.  That could make Sabato or Salas, but not that likely.  Oliver will not get taken by anyone, unless they really believe in him because he would be making the jump from A ball and 22.  

    The remaining on the list are all guys that would be more likely to be taken.  Laweryson the most likely he is typical type that gets taken in rule 5, a pen arm that if you like his stuff enough could be stashed in the pen.  Twins will need to decide do they like him or another pitcher on the list for DFA.  Keeping in mind the DFA does not have to be on 40 man roster if they pass waivers and become FA.  If they do get taken off waivers, then just need to be on 40 man but can be in minors, if they have options. 

    Keirsey, Prato, Helman, and Williams all would be options to take in a rule 5.  They are of age and experience that jump to MLB will not be too big for them.  None will be huge losses though for us.  None are super high prospects and outside of Williams they all seem to play similar rolls.  The question for the Twins is who do they value more, any of them or who they would need to cut, and compare that to how likely will you lose them?  I would say Balazovic would get snatched up quickly on waivers.  Much quicker than any team would take the reaming possible rule 5 guys.  Would anyone really be that upset to lose any of the remaining guys to rule 5?  The only way any of them really see time next year with Twins is if we have several injuries. 

    6 hours ago, Riverbrian said:

    The definition of big is obviously subjective. 

    Big Lake Minnesota is on the shores of Big Lake. Somebody named it Big Lake so somebody at one time thought it actually was a BIG Lake... hence the chosen name.  

    However, if you look at the numbers and compare those size numbers with other lakes in Minnesota. Big lake ain't that Big in comparison.   😉

    The Dodgers SS Rojas had a .612 OPS last season for a 66 OPS+. Kyle Farmer had a .719 OPS and 97 OPS +. That is a pretty significant difference in OPS.  
     

    Miami’s SS had a .554 OPS which is an even bigger Lake Superior size difference on offense.  
     

    Cleveland traded their SS and none of the IF or SS replacements hit above .661 last season most were below .620.  Again that is a Lake Erie size difference offensively.

    that is 3 teams that Farmer would be a huge upgrade offensively.  I’m sure there is another one or two in the same boat if I looked.  I mean the Whitesox for example.  
     

    Who is the stop gap SS for the Rays if Wander Isn’t around anymore?  And at his price the Rays can afford him.
     

    The Dodgers or Marlins may want more offense.  Especially the Marlins and they have to compete to get Farmer from us or sign one of the SS above.  Who else has surplus SS to trade? Also keep in mind Farmer will be paid around 7 million which is way below his actual value.  So a team on a budget like the Marlins could trade for him and probably extend him.  

    3 hours ago, Brandon said:

    The Dodgers SS Rojas had a .612 OPS last season for a 66 OPS+. Kyle Farmer had a .719 OPS and 97 OPS +. That is a pretty significant difference in OPS.  
     

    Miami’s SS had a .554 OPS which is an even bigger Lake Superior size difference on offense.  
     

    Cleveland traded their SS and none of the IF or SS replacements hit above .661 last season most were below .620.  Again that is a Lake Erie size difference offensively.

    that is 3 teams that Farmer would be a huge upgrade offensively.  I’m sure there is another one or two in the same boat if I looked.  I mean the Whitesox for example.  
     

    Who is the stop gap SS for the Rays if Wander Isn’t around anymore?  And at his price the Rays can afford him.
     

    The Dodgers or Marlins may want more offense.  Especially the Marlins and they have to compete to get Farmer from us or sign one of the SS above.  Who else has surplus SS to trade? Also keep in mind Farmer will be paid around 7 million which is way below his actual value.  So a team on a budget like the Marlins could trade for him and probably extend him.  

    The Dodgers have SS's like Farmer coming out of their ears.  Kiki Hernandez had a .731 OPS... traded for at the deadline. Chris Taylor had a .746... Mookie Betts also played SS and he had 1 Million OPS and that list doesn't include Gavin Lux who was going to be the starting SS before he got hurt and will be back next year. Are you sure about Farmer to LA?  

    Cleveland did trade their SS at the deadline. To the Dodgers. Amed Rosario was the 2nd player acquired at the deadline who could play SS. He produced .709 OPS for the Dodgers before being left off the playoff roster because they had a lot of SS's. Including Rojas who has always been a no hit superb fielding SS that the Dodgers purposely acquired from the Marlins that you mention so they had a backup for Lux. It cost them a real good SS prospect named Jacob Amaya who is currently 25 years old and the 6th rated prospect in the Marlins system. Xavier Edwards is also in the Marlins system and ranked #7... not to mention Garrett Hampson with his .729 OPS for 222 AB's and not to mention Jon Berti who is the same age as Farmer had a 749 OPS and can take a base on ya.

    Back to Cleveland... Maybe... I could see them having some interest in Farmer but I believe it's quite possible that in will be all about that Rocchio kid in Cleveland. I certainly don't think they will offer tons to acquire Farmer for that mentor role. 

    The Rays... Maybe... But I see them having a lot more creativity when they approach the SS position. Right now they have about 6 players on the current roster who can man the SS position on any given night.  

    I won't argue that Farmer is better than Wendle or that Farmer hits better than Rojas. But, in the end... you have a 33 year old with a 96 OPS+ about to paid 6.5 million in his last year of arbitration. Teams will not be sending big packages over to the Twins to acquire him. 

    Luplow, Stevenson, Gordon, and De Leon are basically guarantees to be DFA'd. Ortega is a near lock, as he can likely be retained on a MILB deal. Henriquez had a really bad year and can probably be snuck through waivers. Moran is also not good and Funderburk seems to have passed him up on the lefty reliever foodchain, so he's a pretty easy DFA too. Sands and Winder were disappointing but they should both get another year. Alcala is in a weird spot as he's so rarely been healthy, but he's still got 3 options so I think he sticks. Balazovic should get another crack at it too, though having no options left is a problem.

    1 hour ago, Riverbrian said:

    The Dodgers have SS's like Farmer coming out of their ears.  Kiki Hernandez had a .731 OPS... traded for at the deadline. Chris Taylor had a .746... Mookie Betts also played SS and he had 1 Million OPS and that list doesn't include Gavin Lux who was going to be the starting SS before he got hurt and will be back next year. Are you sure about Farmer to LA?  

    Cleveland did trade their SS at the deadline. To the Dodgers. Amed Rosario was the 2nd player acquired at the deadline who could play SS. He produced .709 OPS for the Dodgers before being left off the playoff roster because they had a lot of SS's. Including Rojas who has always been a no hit superb fielding SS that the Dodgers purposely acquired from the Marlins that you mention so they had a backup for Lux. It cost them a real good SS prospect named Jacob Amaya who is currently 25 years old and the 6th rated prospect in the Marlins system. Xavier Edwards is also in the Marlins system and ranked #7... not to mention Garrett Hampson with his .729 OPS for 222 AB's and not to mention Jon Berti who is the same age as Farmer had a 749 OPS and can take a base on ya.

    Back to Cleveland... Maybe... I could see them having some interest in Farmer but I believe it's quite possible that in will be all about that Rocchio kid in Cleveland. I certainly don't think they will offer tons to acquire Farmer for that mentor role. 

    The Rays... Maybe... But I see them having a lot more creativity when they approach the SS position. Right now they have about 6 players on the current roster who can man the SS position on any given night.  

    I won't argue that Farmer is better than Wendle or that Farmer hits better than Rojas. But, in the end... you have a 33 year old with a 96 OPS+ about to paid 6.5 million in his last year of arbitration. Teams will not be sending big packages over to the Twins to acquire him. 

    If these teams have all of these options then why didn’t they use them.  I do think he is worth significantly more because there is a shift in the market due to lack of availability.  It only takes one team to offer a good enough prospect.  6.5 million for an average hitting and a slightly above average fielding SS who is good for 1.5-2 WAR is worth more than 6.5 million.  So you and I can agree to disagree for now and we will see what kind of return we get for him.  With what your saying I wouldn’t trade him unless budget was an issue as he would be more valuable to us in that case.

    I think Balazovic for another season, but he really needs to work in the offseason.  He has decent stuff, but he really needs to work on his out pitch.  He throws way too many pitches by wasting them.  I still think there is hope, but the clock is ticking.

    7 hours ago, Brandon said:

    If these teams have all of these options then why didn’t they use them.  I do think he is worth significantly more because there is a shift in the market due to lack of availability.  It only takes one team to offer a good enough prospect.  6.5 million for an average hitting and a slightly above average fielding SS who is good for 1.5-2 WAR is worth more than 6.5 million.  So you and I can agree to disagree for now and we will see what kind of return we get for him.  With what your saying I wouldn’t trade him unless budget was an issue as he would be more valuable to us in that case.

    Uncle.

    I just got into this discussion to point out that there isn't that BIG of a difference between Kyle Farmer and others who can man the SS position. You and I will agree to disagree.

    I will refer you back to the Jorgenswest post earlier in this thread. His posts are always rooted in solid logic. The SS landscape is fluid... More young SS's will be showing up next year.  

    I don't want to spend any more time sounding like I'm disparaging Farmer which I would have to do in order to continue this conversation. He doesn't deserve that. I am happy he was a Twin.

    Besides this discussion is about Balozovic. 

     

    On 10/19/2023 at 3:32 PM, Brandon said:

    Kyle Farmer had a .719 OPS and 97 OPS +.

    Do you think teams are going to ignore that skew in OPS given that he spent much of the year as a platoon player?

    In 2022 as a regular he had 165 extra plate appearances against right handed pitching and only 25 extra plate appearances against lefties. He hits lefties much better than righties. If you adjust the 2022 ratio of plate appearances to that of 2023 his OPS+ for 2022 would have been 106. I think the Twins saw that and hoped to get that level of platoon production but he didn’t dominate lefties as he had in 2022. Going the other direction if you take his 2023 numbers and scale them to that of a regular, his OPS+ is 93 and virtually the same as it was in 2022. Much of his WAR comes from his at bats against lefties.

    I don’t think any contender would view him as an every day SS. I do think he is valuable to the Twins in a platoon/bench even with some decline. I don’t think he has very much value in excess of his arb 3 contract though. I would be really surprised if teams would give up a significant prospect. I do think getting a return of a similarly salaried 1-1.5 WAR veteran is possible. I do think a prospect like Balazovic (out of options) or Headrick (getting old and needs a 40 spot) is possible.

    While we disagree about the potential return, we both hope you are proved correct.

    15 minutes ago, jorgenswest said:

    Do you think teams are going to ignore that skew in OPS given that he spent much of the year as a platoon player?

    In 2022 as a regular he had 165 extra plate appearances against right handed pitching and only 25 extra plate appearances against lefties. He hits lefties much better than righties. If you adjust the 2022 ratio of plate appearances to that of 2023 his OPS+ for 2022 would have been 106. I think the Twins saw that and hoped to get that level of platoon production but he didn’t dominate lefties as he had in 2022. Going the other direction if you take his 2023 numbers and scale them to that of a regular, his OPS+ is 93 and virtually the same as it was in 2022. Much of his WAR comes from his at bats against lefties.

    I don’t think any contender would view him as an every day SS. I do think he is valuable to the Twins in a platoon/bench even with some decline. I don’t think he has very much value in excess of his arb 3 contract though. I would be really surprised if teams would give up a significant prospect. I do think getting a return of a similarly salaried 1-1.5 WAR veteran is possible. I do think a prospect like Balazovic (out of options) or Headrick (getting old and needs a 40 spot) is possible.

    While we disagree about the potential return, we both hope you are proved correct.

    The ability to get a better return depends on who else is better that is available.  All I am seeing is Farmer is the best available.  And by a wide enough of a margin that it will artificially boost his value.  With that I think we could push for a better prospect if there are more than 1 team trying to upgrade SS.  I would think someone like Festa or Rosario would be a comparable ceiling and I think the Twins could do better the Headrick as Farmer is solid both offensively and defensively.  If Headrick is what’s available, we should just hold on to him.  We are in a competitive window and unless the budget mandates a salary dump we don’t need to trade him.  I could be wrong but I just don’t see how the Twins give him up for less and how out of several teams who need to upgrade at SS that not one of them pays up to get him.  Again I could be wrong and it will be fun to see what the end result will be.

    On 10/19/2023 at 1:24 PM, jorgenswest said:

    He is out of options. Would you make him the number 5 starter? Would you DFA him in hopes of getting him through waivers and then start him in AAA?

    This is the crux of the issue. At best he would be one of the relievers that get churned back and forth to St Paul. Since he is out of options you would have to outright him then. So you might as well do it now and let him have one last crack in St Paul if he clears waivers. If he doesn’t I wouldn’t bat an eye. He’s eminently replaceable. 




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...