Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Assessing the Twins' Trade of Jorge Polanco


    Ted Schwerzler

    All offseason, there has been a focus on the Minnesota Twins making a move, including one of their longest-tenured players. It took a lot of time, but with January running out, Jorge Polanco was shipped to the Seattle Mariners for a package of four players.

    Image courtesy of © Jordan Johnson-USA TODAY Sports

    Twins Video

    While Max Kepler and Jorge Polanco have been the source of trade talks for months, things started to become clearer when Polanco was a late subtraction from the TwinsFest lineup over the weekend. Maybe that was unrelated in actuality, but ultimately, it foreshadowed a moment that felt bittersweetly inevitable.

    Having been in the organization since he was 16 and playing more than 1,400 games across all levels, Polanco heads to a new team for the first time in his career. Seattle is taking on his $10.5-million salary, and will be on the hook for a $750,000 buyout in 2025 unless they pick up his $12-million option. That's a perfectly palatable salary for a player like Polanco, though, and if he has a solid season, it's likely they'll retain him at that slightly higher rate.

    Minnesota moving Polanco is relatively straightforward. Injuries and shifting team needs shifted the bulk of the second base playing time to Edouard Julien last season, and Minnesota has positional depth in the form of Royce Lewis, Kyle Farmer, and prospect Brooks Lee. For a team we know to be scaling back payroll relative to the last two seasons, getting their veteran leader's contract off the books helps.

    In return, the Twins fill two immediate needs on the pitching side of the roster. Anthony DeSclafani went to the Mariners as part of the Robbie Ray deal with the San Francisco Giants. He won’t fill the hole Sonny Gray or Kenta Maeda left in Rocco Baldelli’s options box, but he should fit as a fourth or fifth rotation option alongside Chris Paddack.

    The past two seasons were not good with the Giants, and the former Reds pitcher posted a 5.16 ERA while failing to stay healthy and pitching just a total of 118 2/3 innings. His first season in the Bay Area (in 2021) resulted in a 3.17 ERA across 167 2/3 innings, though, and he posted career-low H/9 (7.6) and HR/9 (1.0). DeSclafani isn’t Dylan Bundy or J.A. Happ, but he’s probably an arm to pair with Paddack in hopes of the two contributing something like 250 total innings to shore up the rotation.

    Beyond DeSclafani, the other 26-man man addition comes in the form of Justin Topa. Having had brief stints with the Brewers three of the past four seasons, Topa got consistent run with the Mariners in 2023. Across 69 innings, he posted a 2.61 ERA with a 3.15 FIP. He doesn’t give up homers and strikes out plenty, but the ground ball profile sets him apart from Minnesota’s arms as a whole. Topa sits 95 mph with his sinker and throws it almost 50% of the time. The downward movement of the offering has resulted in ground ball rates north of 56%. He should have a better chance to make that usable than Dylan Floro did a year ago.

    The two-for-one big league nature of the deal fills the Twins 40-man roster, but they also picked up a pair of prospects in the deal. The most notable is Gabriel Gonzalez, whom MLB Pipeline has ranked as the 79th overall prospect. He will slot into the Minnesota ranks just behind Walker Jenkins, Lee, and Emmanuel Rodriguez on that list, and he'll be a late, high insert into our Twins Daily Top Prospects countdown, which began in earnest Monday. He reached High A last season as just a 19-year-old, and should be expected to start with Cedar Rapids this season. Adding an additional top-100 prospect helps to bolster the Twins farm as a whole and makes arms like Marco Raya and David Festa even better depth pieces.

    The other prospect coming back to the Twins is right-handed pitcher Darren Bowen. He should fit into the top 20 organizationally and showed well during his professional debut last season. After being taken in the 13th round of the 2022 MLB Draft, Bowen pitched all of 2023 at Low A and worked as a starter, with a 3.88 ERA. The strikeouts were impressive, and while he walked too many, he gave up just two homers across 55 2/3 innings. As an upside lottery ticket, you could do a lot worse.

    Beyond just the players involved, Seattle is sending the Twins cash, which will offset a portion of DeSclafani’s $12-million salary. They are getting the initial $6 million that San Francisco sent to the Mariners, and Ryan Divish is reporting that Minnesota will also receive additional funds. Dan Hayes has confirmed that amount to be another $2 million. This more than halves the dollars the Twins are on the hook for with DeSclafani, paying him just $4 million and pushing their current payroll outlay to around $115 million.

    As things stand, the major-league roster sees a few players shuffle because of the deal. If there was any doubt that Julien would be the Opening Day second baseman, that should be gone. Kyle Farmer also appears likelier to stick on the team as a utility type. The designated hitter spot is wide open, and plenty of players should expect to be rotated through it this season--assuming the money saved here isn't repurposed to land a slugger who fills that very role, which might not be a safe assumption.

    Minnesota still needs an impact arm addition for the rotation, but that may be something Falvey feels can wait until the summer, with the more immediate need on the positional side. He has suggested that the savings from the deal will be reallocated into the roster, and with something like $10-15 million yet to be spent, there should be an opportunity to find a difference maker no matter what position they play. Regardless, the five now are set to include Pablo López, Joe Ryan, Bailey Ober, Paddack, and DeSclafani. That could mean Minnesota likes what they saw out of Louie Varland in relief too much to remove him from that role, or that they intend to stash him in St. Paul until an opening in the rotation presents itself, as they did with Ober last spring. Varland is still eligible to be optioned to the minors, and it would be a minor shock if he didn't yo-yo at least once or twice in 2024.

    Keeping Varland working out of the pen may differ from what he wanted to do, but he can emerge as a high-leverage option throughout a full season. Topa also joins that group, and although he was a late-bloomer, there should be no reason to think he won’t have a spot on Opening Day--though he's also optionable, so flexibility rules again. Kody Funderburk and Jorge Alcalá still have options, so they, too, fit into a collection of arms who will hover on the fringe of the roster.

    The Twins arguably dealt the best player in the deal. At 30 years old and having last been fully healthy in 2021, it’s a tough bet to bank on Polanco being available. Minnesota also has plenty of depth on the dirt, making him expendable. In doing this deal with the Mariners, Falvey found a way to get maximal value in return. Picking up a top-100 prospect and a pair of 26-man contributors is nimble work, even if it creates a roster crunch when they want to do anything else. The downside is that DeSclafani doesn’t move the bar for the type of pitcher Minnesota still needs, and Topa may push out a similarly usable reliever.

    With the payroll lower than where it was before the trade, the Twins have created further opportunities for themselves. How they use that in the future remains to be seen. What are your thoughts on the trade and how it sets them up for the rest of the offseason?

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    Marek Houston

    Cedar Rapids Kernels - A+, SS
    The 22-year-old went 2-for-5 on Friday night, his fourth straight multi-hit game. Heading into the week, he was hitting .246/.328/.404 (.732). Four games later, he is hitting .303/.361/.447 (.808).

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    4 hours ago, Major League Ready said:

    This type of roster management is by far the most effective way for a team in the bottom half of revenue to sustain success and history supports this assertion.

    Wait...wut?

     

    Can you point to your past posts advocating trading for mid-30s pitchers?

    1 hour ago, USAFChief said:

    Wait...wut?

     

    Can you point to your past posts advocating trading for mid-30s pitchers?

    For starters, you are not even responding to what I posted, and this is just petty.  You find an irrelevant aspect rather than focus on the metritis aspect of the trade or you don't understand the merit.   I said history will support the assertion that this type of trade is how bottom half teams have succeeded.  You have focused only on the major league talent, ignored, the prospects, and ignored the fact they added major league on a budget.  The fact that the major league talent is older is not relevant.  The relevant aspects of the strategy they employed are that they ....

    • Traded from excess.
    • Traded a player with two years of control who had provided a great deal of value.
    • Received what would project to be far more total value than he could provide.  (See ESPN and Fangraphs)   
    • They also got some shorter-term assets in positions of need making up for present value lost.
    • Made room for a top prospect (Lee) 
    • Got a top 100 prospect
    • Got another decent prospect with upside.
    • Added SP for $4M that is the rough equivalent of SPs that signed for 3X that amount.  
    • Traded a player whose trade value was higher than keeping him because he had been replaced as a starter.

    This kind of creativity in acquiring major talent and getting good future value is exactly how teams in the bottom half of revenue construct a successful roster.  There is none so blind as those who will not see and you just don't want to see.

    16 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    The spot in the order isn't really the point. He's one of their 4 or 5 best hitters. They took a bat from the top of their lineup and replaced it with a reliever and a starter nobody thinks is actually any good. I hope you're right and it's not a big issue replacing a 115+ OPS+ bat at the top of the lineup. History says you're probably wrong, though.

    TBF I totally get your point. And what I think needs to be mentioned is that the money saved from this trade will be reinvested onto the payroll. And that will likely be a RH bat. Also, last season taught me to believe in our rookies! Julien was a really late round pick and he's flourished at MLB level. I have absolute faith that Lee can have a really solid rookie year. It may require some short term pain in losing a good, veteran hitter's production in Polanco but I think the impact will be fairly minimal. 

    For anyone who can't find AB's for Polanco so therefore he must go. 

    OK... Let's Assume there are no injuries... which never happens... but let's assume that ALL players stay healthy for all 162 games.

    And let's also assume that not only did all of our players stay healthy but all of our players are also playing well... playing to expectation or exceeding expectation. Which never happens. 

    How many starts for all of these healthy and performing players is the question? 

    The answer is simple... Do the very simple math... 8 positions if you take the Catcher spot out... 11 players that need playing time if you take the catcher spots out. 

    Here's the formula - 162 games x 8 / 11. Total that up and the answer is:  IT DOESN"T MATTER

    It doesn't matter because everyone is healthy and playing well. It doesn't matter who Rocco puts in the lineup because they are all meeting or exceeding expectation so who cares how many starts individual players get.

    However... that never happens... but if it ever does happen... the Twins will win the AL Central by a million miles and we can look back on these discussions and laugh and laugh and laugh because it was such a trivial concern. 

    5 hours ago, UK Twin said:

    TBF I totally get your point. And what I think needs to be mentioned is that the money saved from this trade will be reinvested onto the payroll. And that will likely be a RH bat. Also, last season taught me to believe in our rookies! Julien was a really late round pick and he's flourished at MLB level. I have absolute faith that Lee can have a really solid rookie year. It may require some short term pain in losing a good, veteran hitter's production in Polanco but I think the impact will be fairly minimal. 

    I've maybe not acknowledged it in our back and forth, but I've mentioned future moves in other posts. When the 5.25 mil is reinvested into the roster I'll reasses where things are at, but I'm not going to praise them for moves they haven't made yet. If that RH bat is Donovan Solano I'm not giving them heaps of praise for this wonderful manipulation of the roster and finances, but if it's Jorge Soler I will. I just won't praise them for saving money until they've shown what they do with it.

    Julien destroyed the minors every step of the way. Lee has not. I think Lee can be a very good player, but I'm not a fan of relying on him to improve an ALDS team. No problem with others having that stance, but it's not where I'm at with him yet. Rookies fail more than they succeed. Miranda is already an after thought on this team after he put up much better upper minors numbers and had a great rookie year. I'm just more hesitant to rely on rookies and young guys improving an ALDS team. Just maintaining an ALDS team when losing your #2 pitcher and a top 4-5 bat is really hard when your biggest addition is a reliever and prospect who's 2 or 3 years away at best.

    14 hours ago, chpettit19 said:

    So you were real mad all postseason that they were just ruining their chances of winning by playing Polo everyday and hitting him between Julien and Lewis, right?

    I was plenty irritated they kept playing Polanco at 3B instead of Willi Castro.

    1 hour ago, chpettit19 said:

    When the 5.25 mil is reinvested into the roster I'll reasses where things are at, but I'm not going to praise them for moves they haven't made yet.

    I'm fine with the Polanco trade but still irritated how they're taking a potential contender and starving it of resources. Apparently AJ Pierzynski agrees with me.

    'They're so broke': A.J. Pierzynski rips Twins owners after Polanco trade - Sports Illustrated Minnesota Sports, News, Analysis, and More

    27 minutes ago, DJL44 said:

    I'm fine with the Polanco trade but still irritated how they're taking a potential contender and starving it of resources. Apparently AJ Pierzynski agrees with me.

    'They're so broke': A.J. Pierzynski rips Twins owners after Polanco trade - Sports Illustrated Minnesota Sports, News, Analysis, and More

    I'm fine with the return for Polanco, and was expecting him to be traded since the season ended. But this was an ALDS team last year and they've now lost their #2 starter, their number 5 starter/playoff bullpen arm, their 2 hole hitter/top 4-5 hitter from their lineup, and replaced them with a broken down 5th starter 2 other teams have already paid to have not pitch for them, a 32 year old break out rookie reliever, a handful of low probability relievers, and 2 prospects in A ball. The FO doesn't get praise from me for that. The Pohalds definitely don't get praise for anything. I'm with you and Pierzynski.

    I hold out hope and expectations that more is to come. I think it's being oversold that they have some grand plan for some big move with the money saved in this trade. They've surprised me before and I'll wait until opening day to pass final judgement on the offseason, though. But as of this moment I'm not impressed. And the idea that they could use this 5 mil for a deadline deal doesn't impress me either. Don't starve your team (I like your phrasing there) during the offseason and rely on being able to outbid other teams at the deadline to fix the holes you already know you have. Fix them now.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...