Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account
  • Twins News & Analysis

    Joe Pohlad's Comments on Non-Sale of Twins Are an Affront to Fans' Intelligence

    The Pohlad family keeping control of the Twins is bad enough. Pretending it’s good news is worse.

    Matthew Taylor
    Image courtesy of © Bruce Kluckhohn-Imagn Images

    Twins Video

    On Wednesday, the Pohlads announced they will remain the principal owners of the Minnesota Twins, selling only a minority stake in the team. Joe Pohlad opened his remarks, as quoted in Phil Miller’s Star Tribune piece, by saying, “I don’t think we could have imagined a better outcome than where we landed.” For a fanbase that has spent nearly a year hoping for new leadership, new philosophies, and an ownership group willing to invest more aggressively in winning, this is a slap in the face. It's tone-deaf at best and deliberately insulting at worst, as if we are all supposed to smile and nod at the idea that this was the best possible result.

    Pohlad’s entire interview with the paper was filled with the kind of corporate speak that pretends everything is fine, even when it clearly is not. He spoke as though keeping control was a universally positive development, praising “alignment” with the new minority partners and expressing faith in the “future of baseball in Minnesota.” It's empty PR fluff, designed to paper over the reality that nothing meaningful has changed; the same ownership group is still in charge; and the fans who wanted a new voice have been strung along for months. The expectation seems to be that we will all just buy whatever he is selling.

    On the trade deadline fire sale, Pohlad claimed the decision to deal 10 players on July 31 “took him by surprise” and that the moves “had little to do with saving money” and were “primarily baseball decisions.” That is simply not credible. In addition to the other nine trades (which were likely financially motivated as well), the Carlos Correa trade was a pure salary dump, the very definition of a move made for financial reasons. Multiple reports say it was ownership, not Derek Falvey, who pushed the trade across the finish line. To tell fans this was “primarily” about baseball is to assume we are too gullible to connect the dots.

    He also addressed criticism by saying that being booed is “part of the role” and that he would “rather have passionate fans than fans who are disengaged.” That is not just tone-deaf; it's a lie. This fanbase is already incredibly disengaged, as evidenced by the Twins being on pace for the lowest attendance in Target Field history this season, a pace set long before this ownership news. Saying boos mean all is well ignores the fact that many fans are not booing; they are simply not showing up.

    Then came perhaps the most outrageous claim, that the Twins have taken on “significant debt,” up to $400 million, since the summer of 2020. This from a franchise that receives lucrative national media rights money, revenue sharing, and has run average to below-average payrolls for years. We are supposed to believe that, somehow, they have lost nearly half a billion dollars in four seasons. It defies logic. And Pohlad’s follow-up only made it worse:

    “As far as I’m aware, that debt was not a hindrance in this process… but with this transaction, we’re going to be paying that debt down," he said. In this context, “process” meant selling the team in full, and claiming that the debt was not an issue in doing so is just not true. It's clear the Pohlads were seeking extra money beyond a reasonable valuation, so they could pay off that debt and still walk away with the payday they wanted. The fact that he frames this as if it had no impact on the outcome is yet another example of how little regard this ownership has for fans’ ability to see through the spin.

    In the end, the most disappointing part is not just that bad owners are staying put. It is that they are doing it while acting like Twins fans are too naive to see through the contradictions, spin, and corporate word salad. We were promised change. Instead, we are told this is the best possible outcome, that money is no object, and that ownership is as committed to winning as we are. Their words say one thing, their actions say another, and they expect us to believe them, anyway. That's not just frustrating. It is insulting.

    Follow Twins Daily For Minnesota Twins News & Analysis

    Recent Twins Articles

    Recent Twins Videos

    Twins Top Prospects

    James Ellwanger

    Fort Myers Mighty Mussels - A, RHP
    On Wednesday, Ellwanger walked 3 and struck out 6 batters in 4 2/3 scoreless, hitless innings. In 3 starts and 11 2/3 innings, he's given up no runs, just 3 hits, walked 5 and has 15 strikeouts.

    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments



    Featured Comments

    1 hour ago, NotAboutWinning said:

    This makes no sense whatsoever. Why would anyone pay above market price to hitch their wagon to this s***show? Without a controlling interest and no path to one? 2 groups were willing to do this, somewhere in the neighborhood of $400m? There has to be more to this!

    I'd say either

    a) They're two separate groups of idiots who've somehow accumulated  hundreds of millions of dollars who are now going to invest those millions in a money-losing operation

    Or

    b) They're two separate groups who feel sorry for the Pohlads and are investing out of the goodness of their collective hearts

    Or

    c) They're two separate groups who've managed to accumulate hundreds of millions who believe it'll be a sound investment that'll pay off in the future.  Meaning the Twins ain't losing money.

    I'll go witb c.

     

    14 hours ago, mnfireman said:

    Found the original draft of the letter before AI "fixed" it... (wink, wink, (sarcasm))

    May be an image of text

    The announcement last fall said nothing of selling the team.  I said the would "explore" selling the team.  Only a fool would not realize the difference.

    20 hours ago, The Great Hambino said:

    Even if Joe truly has the best intentions of running the team as best he can, the fact that the Astros owner went over his head to Jim to make the Correa deal happen tells us who's really running this team.

    Even if he wants the Twins to win, he wants even more to prove to his uncles that he's a big boy

    well in my book, he's failing at THAT!  Long term season ticket holder here who quit buying them 2 years ago because of retirement.  I was sad then, not so much now.  I am old, so I can sit at home and watch the Brewers just as easily as I can watch the Twins, and probably be happier.  I feel sorry for the young players who have basically been brought into a losing situation when they THOUGHT they were going to be on a good team.

    17 hours ago, palmspringstwinsfan said:

    A big question to me is how this team managed to run up such a huge debt, given the extraordinary amount of money they receive every year from MLB. Some things I’ve read suggest those payments are far more than the payroll. I understand that the local TV money is way down, as is attendance, and there is debt service to pay. But I have to conclude that the 12 or so Pohlads who own the team must be getting big dividend payouts. No wonder they didn’t want to give up their gravy train. 

    To your point, I would like to understand where the debt came from.  It is not remotely clear that it came from true baseball operations.

    10 hours ago, NotAboutWinning said:

    This makes no sense whatsoever. Why would anyone pay above market price to hitch their wagon to this s***show? Without a controlling interest and no path to one? 2 groups were willing to do this, somewhere in the neighborhood of $400m? There has to be more to this!

    Seems to me, similar to what you are intimating, once one looks past the disappointment and angst of fan base …….nobody throws $400M at something that is poorly marketed and whose customer’s are pissed off and walking away……. without some agreed to path to change. It’s not in the minority owners best interest to just turn over a huge amount of $$ to the Pohlads ownership w/o some framework of a plan for success. Can’t just be “we’ll write you a check and then let’s shoot from the hip & hope” ……. gotta expect moves to get the Team competitive in ‘26 to maintain and better revenues…….. only path to decent ROI - right?!?!

    The ownership is no longer the Pohlad’s in a vacuum and the 2 groups that “invested” are not clueless & carefree with $400M - just not realistic! Gotta expect some positive change.

    Yes, they tried to put a good spin on a bad situation. Tried to sell, asked too much and failed. Did the next best thing and sold 20% to reduce debt which in and of itself is good. But after all of that I doubt they will spend big money only to back into more debt. 

    I woukd be interested in knowing how they built up that much debt in the first place. Some say the debt was from other businesses. Donthe Twins generat positive cash flow? Have the plugged the holes on where the debt originated? So many questions going forward. 

    But, what's for certain, they have lost the faith of the fans. 

    9 hours ago, LastOnePicked said:

    Here's the problem: that's already happened. Attendance is worse than a lot of the Metrodome days. The Pohlads will lobby for more revenue sharing, and they'll pocket the cash to make up for their loss of equity to their minority partners.

    They intend to run this as a failing business, because even in MLB, their assets will appreciate and their pockets will be lined with league revenue cash.

    That's the tragedy of all this. There is nothing - nothing - that fans can do that will hurt the Pohlads financially at this point. We may have animosity for them, but we don't even factor into their equations. They will field a fanless, worthless team for years and years to come.

    Tragic. At least, for those in MN who love professional baseball.

    I think you hit the nail on the head. 

    Could be an A’s fan……..

    I mean, Sacramento  fan…….

    Obviously, not selling sucks but there are some pretty decent players coming 4-6 over next two seasons and 3-4 more just traded for and 7-9 on current 26 man along with Festa - SWR - Lopez all back at some point. They don’t need 9-10 capable starters going into ‘26…….. some body’s getting traded and/or shifted to the bullpen. 

    If they spend $40M of the $70M they will have shed by end of ‘25 they’ll be good next season. I get everyone here likes to be negative so they can “be right” or “pleasantly surprised” in the future………MLB & Player’s Association won’t let them just not spend anything….. will effect revenue share.

    To me they have 4 position player holes and 2 Pen holes to fill via FA and via youth. Very doable!!

    Festa - Bradley - Abel - Matthews - SWR - Ober - Morris - Prielipp  - Raya - Soto…….have got to cover 3 PEN slots with this group…….10 guys, can’t be that tough. 2 guys in FA for Pen. (Coulombe type plus hard throwing RH - FA) Plus Topa - Sands - Funderburk.

    Ryan & Lopez plus 3 from list above with 2 in the wings. Staff seems just fine to me, on paper.

    9 minutes ago, JD-TWINS said:

    Could be an A’s fan……..

    I mean, Sacramento  fan…….

    Obviously, not selling sucks but there are some pretty decent players coming 4-6 over next two seasons and 3-4 more just traded for and 7-9 on current 26 man along with Festa - SWR - Lopez all back at some point. They don’t need 9-10 capable starters going into ‘26…….. some body’s getting traded and/or shifted to the bullpen. 

    If they spend $40M of the $70M they will have shed by end of ‘25 they’ll be good next season. I get everyone here likes to be negative so they can “be right” or “pleasantly surprised” in the future………MLB & Player’s Association won’t let them just not spend anything….. will effect revenue share.

    To me they have 4 position player holes and 2 Pen holes to fill via FA and via youth. Very doable!!

    Festa - Bradley - Abel - Matthews - SWR - Ober - Morris - Prielipp  - Raya - Soto…….have got to cover 3 PEN slots with this group…….10 guys, can’t be that tough. 2 guys in FA for Pen. (Coulombe type plus hard throwing RH - FA) Plus Topa - Sands - Funderburk.

    Ryan & Lopez plus 3 from list above with 2 in the wings. Staff seems just fine to me, on paper.

    Soto? He's missed the entire year and is a HS kid still at this point. 

    They aren't putting all the rest of the starters in the bullpen, you need 2-3 in waiting. Plus, they see more value of starters so they'll wait to convert others. 

    Go look at the free agent list, and ask yourself who they would sign. They aren't signing a CF, 3b, SS, 2b. What corner OF that is good will sign for one year, given they have five or six OF in the majors, AAA and AA? That leaves first and catcher.......

    42 minutes ago, Mike Sixel said:

    Soto? He's missed the entire year and is a HS kid still at this point. 

    They aren't putting all the rest of the starters in the bullpen, you need 2-3 in waiting. Plus, they see more value of starters so they'll wait to convert others. 

    Go look at the free agent list, and ask yourself who they would sign. They aren't signing a CF, 3b, SS, 2b. What corner OF that is good will sign for one year, given they have five or six OF in the majors, AAA and AA? That leaves first and catcher.......

    It’s not Rocket Science - typical reaction from TD - Soto is one guy out of 29 mentioned. Whoever the 12th pitcher might be in organization ….. how’s that?

    Maybe should re-read my slant on pitchers. Can’t have 11 starting Pitchers on the 40-man, IMO. Pretty sure I had 12 guys including Ryan & Lopez as starters now……5 to start year with 2-3 in waiting …… my math says there are at least 4-5 guys that are available to contribute in the Show outside of the rotation, while still continuing to develop in St Paul.

    Wallner - Larnach/Roden - Buxton - Outman - Gonzalez - Rodriguez ……….Keaschall/Clemens for additional options in corners as well as on the dirt.

    Lewis - Keaschall - Lee - Culpepper - Houston - Eeles ……..I’d try to utilize Jeffers as 3rd Catcher 2-3 times per month and play him regularly at 1B.

    Offensive trade & FA targets at Catcher & DH……maybe a couple Pen arms.

    I think this is as much about the Pohlads ego as anything else. They couldn't get the price they wanted for the Twins so they're not going to sell. I expect that this winter they'll sell (ooops, trade) Ryan, Lopez, and anyone else who makes more than the minimum salary. With the new minor partners and several years worth of profits the debt should be greatly reduced. Then the Pohlads will put the Twins up for sale again. And they hope they will receive the ego boost of being able to say we got the price we wanted. Which means Twins fans are sc***** for years. Go ahead Pohlads, prove me wrong!

    On 8/16/2025 at 9:15 AM, D.C Twins said:

    This is the key... people need to vote with their feet.

    A true and sustained mass exodus of the fan base will hurt the Pohlad's financially and that is all they will listen too. 

    If they 'take their toys and go home' by selling the team outside of the state... so be it... we do not need to be held hostage to a rotten franchise. 

    I can't help but think this is part of a cynical pohlad plan.  Piss off the base, sell off the assets, attendance at Targét plummets.

    Ladies and gentlemen, presenting your 2028 Raleigh-Durham Twins.




    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...