clone52 Verified Member Posted July 27, 2016 Posted July 27, 2016 I love this post - but seriously wouldn't Malone or Nolasco to an extent slide nicely into an NL rotation? RA should be on the phones all day selling this point. Milone yes. Nolasco not at that price. If you are the GM and you trade Milone today, then get offers Monday to trade both Nolasco and Santana on Monday, what do you do with the rotation? My guess is you aren't getting much for Milone either way, so you can afford to wait to see how things shake out with Nolasco and Santana.
Mr. Brooks Verified Member Posted July 27, 2016 Posted July 27, 2016 So where does the Lucas Harrell trade fit into this theory that the Twins can't trade early because only the top guys are traded early? Seems like a pretty clear contradiction to me, but I'm sure I'll very an explanation or two about how the Twins are just unlucky, like always.
Loosey Verified Member Posted July 28, 2016 Author Posted July 28, 2016 I think 2017 is a very realistic goal to be in Wild Card contention. Considering the Twins were in contention at 83-79 last year, you really only have to be a .500 team to be in contention. Add that to the fact that the Twins are 16-14 in their last 30 games, it appears as though they might be back to the same level as they were last year. You would expect growth from the young guys next year (Sano, Buxton, Kepler, Rosario mostly) and other than a continual decline of Mauer, you wouldn't really expect a big step back on the offensive side of the ball. To me, they need to clear Nolasco and probably Milone to open up rotation spots for Berrios and someone else deserving, but beyond that, they should at least be back in contention this year. If the Twins are near .500 the rest of the way, i think that reflects really well on Molitor for not completely losing the team after a disastrous start.I can get on board with these assumptions. The young guys "Should" get better. Assuming Berrios will be as good as we hope he can be, a rotation to start 2017 of Berrios, Santana and Gibson as the main 3 could be decent core. My main concern with Santana however is when does his age catch up with him? Additionally, Assuming those three are the core of the rotation who fills out the next two spots? If they plan to compete I don't see Gonsalves or Jay making the jump to fill it out to start the season. Do they move May into a spot? Sign a veteran to a one year flyer contract? (this is assuming Nolasco and Milone are gone)
clone52 Verified Member Posted July 28, 2016 Posted July 28, 2016 I can get on board with these assumptions. The young guys "Should" get better. Assuming Berrios will be as good as we hope he can be, a rotation to start 2017 of Berrios, Santana and Gibson as the main 3 could be decent core. My main concern with Santana however is when does his age catch up with him? Additionally, Assuming those three are the core of the rotation who fills out the next two spots? If they plan to compete I don't see Gonsalves or Jay making the jump to fill it out to start the season. Do they move May into a spot? Sign a veteran to a one year flyer contract? (this is assuming Nolasco and Milone are gone) We have high expectations for Berrios and he will probably have some struggles. My guess is that they will convert May back to a starter. That still leaves 1 spot open, hopefully for Duffey to recover and keep.
mikelink45 Old-Timey Member Posted July 28, 2016 Posted July 28, 2016 That is really hilarious. In what world is Ervin Santana as valuable as Drew Pomeranz? Pomeranz is far younger and far cheaper than Santana, and as far as I can tell, just as effective if not more effective than Santana. Sure, you don't have to wait for Lucroy to be traded, but if teams think they have a shot at Lucroy, they aren't even going to listen to offers for Suzuki. Abad and Kintzler can still be flipped.I hope it hilarious. So far every site talks about players from multiple teams, but nothing about the Twins. Pomeranz has no history. He is not an A player. He has had a good half season.
jimmer Verified Member Posted July 28, 2016 Posted July 28, 2016 I hope it hilarious. So far every site talks about players from multiple teams, but nothing about the Twins. Pomeranz has no history. He is not an A player. He has had a good half season.Pomeranz has been good for awhile now, not just this year. Basically since he left Colorado.
mikelink45 Old-Timey Member Posted July 28, 2016 Posted July 28, 2016 We have high expectations for Berrios and he will probably have some struggles. My guess is that they will convert May back to a starter. That still leaves 1 spot open, hopefully for Duffey to recover and keep.This is an okay - not a good pitcherSeason Team W L SV G GS IP K/9 BB/9 HR/9 BABIP LOB% GB% HR/FB ERA FIP xFIP WAR2011 Indians (A+) 3 2 0 15 15 77.0 11.10 3.74 0.23 .295 77.7 % 1.87 2.38 2011 Rockies (AA) 1 0 0 2 2 10.0 6.30 0.00 0.00 .080 100.0 % 0.00 1.98 2011 Indians (AA) 0 1 0 3 3 14.0 10.93 3.86 0.64 .273 82.2 % 2.57 3.20 2011 Rockies 2 1 0 4 4 18.1 6.38 2.45 0.00 .328 56.0 % 47.4 % 0.0 % 5.40 2.59 3.62 0.72012 Rockies (AA) 0 0 0 1 1 4.0 9.00 2.25 0.00 .308 100.0 % 0.00 2.78 2012 Rockies (AAA) 4 4 0 9 9 46.2 8.87 3.86 0.39 .347 70.8 % 2.51 3.54 2012 Rockies 2 9 0 22 22 96.2 7.73 4.28 1.30 .289 70.6 % 43.9 % 13.6 % 4.93 4.81 4.49 0.72013 Rockies (AA) 0 1 0 1 1 5.1 8.44 1.69 3.38 .421 48.8 % 11.81 6.62 2013 Rockies (AAA) 8 1 0 15 15 85.2 10.09 3.47 0.63 .338 71.4 % 4.20 3.50 2013 Rockies 0 4 0 8 4 21.2 7.89 7.89 1.66 .339 76.1 % 50.8 % 19.0 % 6.23 6.46 5.39 -0.3 Fangraphs http://www.fangraphs.com/statss.aspx?playerid=11426&position=P
Kaelen Culpepper St. Paul Saints - AAA SS At long last, Kaelen Culpepper has been called up to the Twins! Explore Kaelen Culpepper News >
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.