Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    25,645
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. The rotation has been the team's biggest strength for awhile now, so I'm not sure what there is to complain about in that regard. I want to clean house and Falvey hasn't done enough to adjust offensively since the league deadened the ball so he's out too, but I'm not going to mark down 'failure to build a rotation' during his exit interview.
  2. Who outside of the fans that weren't paying attention were vaunting the pitching pipeline? That was not the Cleveland model, not sure why anyone thought it would be the model here.
  3. Agreed, they hang on to just about everyone too long. Not just vets like Polanco and Kepler, but also young guys like Miranda and Julien. If they make the right read on Miranda, they can probably trade him nearly straight up for Luis Castillo instead of trading Steer plus others for Mahle. They are poor at evaluating their young talent, and poor at evaluating the decline of veterans. Also, Cleveland never had a pitching pipeline. The traded for just about every one of their good starting pitchers either when they were already top prospects in the high minors, or after they debuted at the MLB level. Last we did this exercise, I think I found Danny Salazar was their only home-grown arm of note while Falvey was there. And I'm fine with that strategy. Nothing is more finicky as a pitching 'prospect' in A ball. Trade for them when they are more of a sure thing. Worked with Joe Ryan.
  4. Smith would have had to sign him while Hunter was already in free agency, and after Hunter had already felt slapped in the face by the Twins. Ryan only offered him a 3 year 45M deal in August prior to him becoming a free agent, while the Angels gave him a 5 year 90M deal and reports were that the Rangers were offering something similar and both the White Sox and the KANSAS CITY ROYALS!!! were also pursing him. Yeah, the Pohlad's were tight with money, but it was Ryan who couldn't stomach giving out long term deals, which obviously was going to be an issue with the upcoming Joe Mauer situation. Yeah, I remember those Dodger rumors. That would have been quite the haul.
  5. Adding the sinker isn't going to help the strikeout numbers. I think he can be good, but without missing bats, he's giving off some Josh Winder vibes.
  6. Terry Ryan's reluctance to give out long term deals to Santana and Hunter was likely a big reason he was pushed out in favor of Bill Smith. The Twins were getting a new stadium and wanted to make sure Mauer and Morneau were still there long term and Ryan clearly couldn't stomach such contracts. But I'm not sure a long term deal for Santana wouldn't have worked out better for the Twins. Yes, he was out for the 2011 season which may have been unavoidable, but when he returned in 2012, he was back to his dominant self. He was probably the Cy Young front runner after throwing his infamous 134 pitch no-hitter on June 1st. That no hitter was important to the Mets as they had never had one, but Santana never recovered. His shoulder was shot and he limped out a couple of more months before having to shut down his career for good. I know pitch counts aren't popular, but no way the Twins would have been that irresponsible. Heck, they took him out during his 17 strikeout game when he had a chance to tie the all time record of 20.
  7. I don't want Baldelli as manager. Are you asking what is the Pohlad's argument against firing Baldelli? Apathy. Sorry, for as much as fans on this board care and want a new manager, the general public doesn't care and firing a manager would look like waiving a white flag to those people, further signaling a lost year to them and dysfunction to prospective buyers. They won't get more fans nor more buyers by firing the manager, so it's not important to them. If Baldelli is fired, it will be because Falvey talks ownership into it, in a desperate attempt to save HIS job.
  8. Seems like something you might want to do BEFORE they make a dozen errors.
  9. I can find a dozen players I'm OK removing from the 40-man.........
  10. Miranda, Julien, Buxton, Lewis, Jeffers. The drastic year-to-year strikeout increase/decrease and the drastic year-to-year offensive production increase/decrease is NOT isolated to just Larnach; this seems to be systematic. I applaud the team for seeing an issue and trying to remedy the situation. But they are TERRIBLE at it. They clearly do not have the remedy.
  11. Right, but none of your bullet points will improve attendance or TV ratings. Hence, there is no impetus for doing any of them other than selling the team.
  12. "When an aggressive hitter gets even more aggressive, then there’s probably overaggressiveness," Rocco Baldelli
  13. The impetus is selling the team at an inflated price, not winning a World Series. Firing the manager probably isn't even close to a thought for them right now.
  14. Yeah, I'll tune that nonsense out. I want to hear Correa had player X, Y and/or Z crossing home plate. If the coaches and manager don't have those guys that need it in the cages instead of the freakin' shortstop, what the hell are they even doing?
  15. Right, hence the 'regrettable contract' caveat to my post. I also always like the Mauer 'leads by example' bit we always heard. That one was a classic.
  16. Right, even if a pitcher had to hit, he would have at least laid down a bunt on the 3B side, not the 1B side like Gasper did!
  17. Man, that was close. Gasper had a real shot to make me eat my words.
  18. I have and will never praise a player for their leadership. With this club, that trait seems to be used almost exclusively to excuse either a bad player or a regrettable contract. I only care what these guys do on the diamond, and that's how it should be.
  19. It's funny that the Twins always have their OWN Micky Gasper, whether it's Keirsey, or Michael Helman or Jair Camargo or Chris Williams or Mark Contreras, but they have no interest in giving those guys a look unless they absolutely have to. But you get some other team's Gasper or Andrew Stevenson or Ryan Lamarre, oh boy, we found a diamond in the rough here fellas, wait until the league sees what we do with this guy! The grass is always greener with this club.
  20. Why would anything need to be in print? I don't see this team firing Baldelli even if they lose their next 20 games, but in every other clubhouse, the manager would clearly be on the hot seat. He should be worried, the players should be worried, but they clearly aren't, which to me is not an endorsement of Baldelli.
  21. I can't stand the hand wringing about having a game where you are forced to lose the DH. This is a complete lack of critical thinking. Oh, no, we lose the DH for one whole at bat! The DH in this case being Mickey Gaspar, who has two whole hits this year makes it even more of non-issue. Not. A. Big. Deal.
  22. These guys have to know their manager is on the hot seat, yet they still play like.....they don't care? That probably says all we need to know about this team right now.
  23. Wait, I'm not watching the HS game right now on Friday night?
×
×
  • Create New...