Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

nicksaviking

Community Moderator
  • Posts

    25,393
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    126

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by nicksaviking

  1. I will say that if news breaks that the Vikings tagged him, there better be follow up news that they have a trade in place within the hour. They can't sweat this out for weeks or months. I don't want the Vikings to miss out on early free agency because they're unsure how much cap space they'll have.
  2. Unless they're making a complete 180, SD isn't trading for minor leaguers. Even with the haul of players they got for Soto last year, four of them were already at the MLB level and the fifth made his debut last year (after immediately being traded FOR Cease). My bet: SD is asking for Vazquez and Duran. Right now the teams are haggling over another piece for MN vs salary relief.
  3. I don't think they can take that gamble. He's probably the top free agent QB available, but unlike most years, it appears there will be others who actually can start. Wilson for sure, plus Rodgers, Cousins and Carr most likely. What do those guys get? 20M max on a 1-2 year deal? So does a team pay Darnold 41M instead of picking one of those guys for half the price? They'd have to view Darnold as a long term answer or a short term championship run answer, and I'm not sure any team would. I think the Vikings went from lotto ticket to parking ticket real fast with him.
  4. Did they fire the GM because coaches told them they didn't want to work with him? Or do they have someone specific in mind? The Jags wouldn't be talking to Belichick would they?
  5. Just saw that the Jets did hire him. Good luck. That organization is a mess, starting with ownership.
  6. I'd rather let the young starters pitch. But I'd also not like to roster any of the trade targets listed. So I guess if that's what he's worth, I keep him.
  7. I agree that Hunter is more likely than Mauer. Hunter does still seem invested in the game. And frankly, he'd be a better choice. Mauer is the local hero, but he's staid, quiet and prefers to keep his insights to himself. Or at least, that was how he was as a player. I understand that this appointment may be more of a figurehead status, however, this role could still lead to league-wide exposure and possible talent recruitment; the outgoing and very connected Torii Hunter seems to be a better choice. And not that I think this person will have the pull, but if you had to choose between Mauer or Hunter into talking the majority owner into opening up the wallet for free agents, Hunter seems to be the hands-down better choice for that.
  8. I'm not as adamantly against the steroid users as I used to. I probably still don't put them in, but I also don't care if they do get in. But at this point they all have to stay out. Most have aged off the ballot, so it seems kind of BS that the back end guys would end up benefitting. I mean really, Pettite gets in and Bonds and Clemens don't? That looks shadier than none of them getting in. Sometime after they're all off the ballot, then it's time to have a special referendum to reconsider. Not the regular voters but a committee like they do with the special eras.
  9. It's not about being poor nor about disposable income. But the small town fans tend to be more prudent with their money. Back in the day they paid a cable bill and channel surfed until they found the Twins as it was already included with their plans, but this is different; going out of their way to pay for a streamer that they will ONLY use to watch the Twins. And it costs more than the streamers they already pay for and watch a half dozen shows on. I also don't know how you fix it AND keep the same cost expectations as the rest of the league. This is going to be a bigger issue for the Twins than most clubs. I'm not trying to generalize people, but the more fans you have that look like this: The more fans you are going to have that are watching their budget. And the Twins have more fans like this than probably any other team.
  10. There's nobody in Hallock MN that will think about the pricing that way. Particularly if they're not watching every game, but maybe watching once a week. And many of them will watch once a week because they do have something else to do; as mentioned earlier, Netflix, Amazon and Hulu are still much cheaper. The Twins didn't build their heyday era fan bases on diehards, they built them on casual fans. Rural fans are more cost conscious than their urban counterparts, and they're not going to snag many of the rural casual fans.
  11. Yeah, Minnesota isn't a small market, but the market is disproportionately rural, especially when factoring in the Dakotas and Iowa. These areas tend to have significantly lower wages and probably more importantly, lower cost of living expenses than markets on the coasts. I'd guess the Twins market will have a similarly disproportionate percentage of their fanbase that would balk at prices those on the coasts wouldn't think twice about.
  12. Rabbit hole conspiracy alert! I was thinking that it's kind of odd that the Raiders haven't reached out to Mike McCarthy. They've interviewed top coordinators Ben Johnson, Aaron Glen and Todd Monkin, but otherwise it seems they've focused on former head coaches, interviewing Steve Spagnolo, Robert Saleh, Pete Carroll, Vance Joseph, and Ron Rivera. Reports also said they have at least talked to Bill Belichick and didn't interview Mike Vrabel only because he already told Tom Brady he was going back to New England. So why not McCarthy? He seems like a pretty good fit considering all of the experienced coaches they're looking at. Conspiracy theory: Tom Brady already has Aaron Rodgers lined up as the LV QB in 2025 and Rodgers and McCarthy didn't get along at the end of their time in Green Bay.
  13. Is it possible that every player on OSU's offense is better than the counterpart offensive player on ND's offense? I think they are.
  14. I have no love for OSU, but I'd rather ND just lose twice.
  15. Linehan never had this kind of anticipation to be a HC. He left Minnesota and went to Miami, even while Tice remained the HC, because he was mad that nobody wanted to hire him after the 2005 season. Not that I think Johnson is a sure thing. I could see it being a disaster, or maybe something like Mike McDaniel in Miami. Might still be able to call a good offensive game, but not being able to run a functional team. And if he's taking his queues from Dan Campbell as to how to be a HC, and that's a strong possibility, it could be a problem. Those two do not seem to have anything close to the same personality; nobody has the same personality as Campbell. If he tries to be a hard-nosed-but-softie-but-still-Alpha type, I think it's going to come off as phoney.
  16. Maybe, but makes me think he probably had already decided on the Bears. Caleb Williams vs, Aiden O'Connell? Kirk Cousins? No idea who's going to be QB there, but it's not going to be pretty.
  17. I don't see it on PFT, but just got a notification that the Bears are getting Ben Johnson. I'm optimistic that this really hurts the Lions, while also optimistic that he might be a better offensive mind than actual head coach. I hope this doesn't work out for either of those teams.
  18. I'm happy this is an option, however I think the team is going to find they get fewer subscribers than they expect up here. Pricing it above Netflix/Hulu/Amazon is going to turn off a lot of casual fans.
  19. Outside of Addison, who is the second starter and third good player? Blackmon and Ward? I wouldn't call Blackmon a starter and I haven't seen anything to suggest either are good players.
  20. 4 years 72M for an inconsistent reliever with poor command. Remind me again why anybody would want to buy a mid or small market team again? With this insurmountable disparity, is it really to try to win a championship?
  21. Nah, it's not the Vikings so I'm not going to worry about it either way!
  22. Wow. Now the Rams are in danger of leaving too much time for the Eagles?!?
  23. All things equal, I kick it deep, but with this snow I might try the onside. In either case, one stop gives LA a chance to win.
×
×
  • Create New...