Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

wsnydes

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,884
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by wsnydes

  1. Sage advice, indeed! I'm in a "living dangerously" mode this morning.
  2. What if I want to take the rest of the quiz anyway?
  3. No Correa again. Anyone know anything more about this heel of his? Here's to hoping that Wallner can get off the schneid!
  4. Patience is typically required for player performance. If you sign a guy and he struggles, whether you're tweaking something or not, you should give them time to try to work through it. It's easier to cut a guy than replace them. Nobody is going to be the same player for 162 games. Nobody. Obviously the greats are better and quicker at getting back to form, but that's what makes them great. And if you're tweaking a guys motion or swing, it's not reasonable to just cut them loose before that player has a chance to get comfortable with the tweak. That said, there are definitely instances where this FO has held on too long. They have have solid reasoning to do so, but we don't always know what that is. Pagan is a clear instance of that. Shoemaker and Happ are others, but I'm not sure I would go with a blanket statement that they're unwilling to admit mistakes in general.
  5. HBP and errors are still options. So, there's that!
  6. I'd have gone a different route myself, but it's reasonable to expect that anyone brought in would throw strikes. Rocco can't throw the ball for these guys. They've got to perform.
  7. Don't ask the pitchers... they don't know either.
  8. I just hope that Wallner learned a thing or two from his first callup this year. It would be great to see that he did.
  9. Larnach to the IL with pneumonia, Wallner up.
  10. At this point, you kind of have to give him a shot right? If you're going to say during the offseason that you're relying on the in-house depth and options, you don't leave yourself much of a choice. It's going to be time to sink or swim for some of these guys.
  11. I noticed that too and I wondered the same. It seems odd to say, but I hope that's the idea.
  12. Good to see Buxton in there again today. Did I hear right that Larnach is sick? Would have been nice to get him in the lineup today.
  13. I think the Arraez factor is overstated. I liked him, but he's a table setter. Table setters still need someone to drive them in. Nobody else in the lineup is hitting, so I don't think he's the cure-all that some want him to be. He'd most often just end up another notch in the LOB column. His presence wouldn't make this lineup a legitimate contending lineup. There are more pieces needed than an Arraez. I agree with those that say Lewis can provide a spark, but it'll still take Kirilloff and Larnach, among others, to really bring the lineup around.
  14. Sure but he's only coming up 4 times a game. Someone still has to drive him in.
  15. Correct. Which is my point. Plus, table setters only help if someone will actually drive them in.
  16. He's not turning this team into a legitimate offense. I liked him, but his presence isn't the fix-all some want to make it
  17. I don't really find it entertaining to sit and wait for the inevitable death by crap pitching though. Good pitching will keep you in games too. It's a pick your poison scenario, obviously. Pretty good talker.
×
×
  • Create New...