Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

dxpavelka

Verified Member
  • Posts

    3,425
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by dxpavelka

  1. I wouldn't say they are INSISTANT on hiring a manger with no experience. It just so happens the guy they hired (who much if not most of the fan base currently griping also thought was the right guy-even as recently as 8 months ago) didn't have any.
  2. And yet Kingman's pretty much remembered as a joke of a player who did one thing well. But you may be right-I may be selling Kingman short. Especially when I compare his numbers to another current Twin who mostly seems to be able to do one thing reasonably well.
  3. If Gardenhire's being groomed as anything it might be as a potential manager. The current guy in that spot seems to be among the struggling. Don't see him being groomed as a potential GM.
  4. Slice .196 any way you want. Schmidt hit for power and raised his career BA to .267. Had he not done that he would be remembered as Dave Kingman,
  5. In what league is a .196 hitter "almost average"?
  6. And if Schmidt had stayed at those levels, he'd have been pumping gas in Altoona by his 4th year. Again, 187 PA for Buxton MAY be a bit early to be drawing firm conclusions.
  7. Is pretty much the only part that matters.
  8. And yet when Danny Santana's was well above the league average in 2014 it was heralded as a bad thing. Bottom line is it's way to early to sell Buxton short.
  9. Buxton is also younger today than Schmidt was when he debuted and to this point has 300 fewer career plate appearances than Schmidt did by the end of his rookie year so I'm thinking there may still be some time and hope for the lad. I'm less concerned about Schmidt's Babip than I am encouraged by the fact that Buxton is hovering near the league average in that overhyped area.
  10. Looks like I need to go to the archives and pull out everything I posted about Aaron Hicks from 2013 to May 2015.
  11. If his BABIP was at the other end of the spectrum (See, Santana, Danny, 2014) I'd be inundated with posts on here about how he would be a candidate for a huge regression to the mean. Should not the same apply in the opposite direction in this situation? Of course a wise man once said that advanced metrics are a wonderful tool--for predicting the past.
  12. Needs to be a leadoff hitter. Dozier is NOT a leadoff hitter. Is Dan Gladden available? Lou Brock? Ricky Henderson?
  13. FIND A LEADOFF HITTER
  14. I've been on the use Plouffe in a Super U role bandwagon since the day Sano first set foot in the big league clubhouse. Have him start 5 game a week-one each at each of the corner infield and outfield spots and one at DH. Unless we some indication that Buxton and / or Kepler is ready to be the every day lead off hitter, any trade needs to net a lead off hitter. Dozier is NOT a lead off hitter. He is a # 6 hitter-as are Park and Rosario unless Plouffe is traded, at which point Park should be able to be your # 5 hitter. This team has lots of pieces. Sometimes the toughest part is putting the right pieces in the right places at the right times.
  15. Short term, Sano shouldn't play right field after lunch.
  16. Been saying it for years. The reason Mauer has spent most of his career in the 3 hole is because he is the best pure hitter they have. That has not changed. Mauer should bat 3rd, Sano 4th and Plouffe 5th. Part of the problem with this lineup is that Rosario, Park and Dozier should all be # 6 hitters. There. I've said it. Dozier is not, never has been, and never will be a leadoff hitter. Unless or until either Buxton or Kepler wins a job and proves to be a leadoff hitter one of those three should be traded for a leadoff hitter. It won't be Park.
  17. Be nice if they could hit a little bit though.
  18. The fact that Cabrera weighed 220 pounds when he switched to the outfield does nothing to lead me to believe that Sano will be successful doing so at 270.
  19. I spent the entire offseason warning of just such a possibility and was assured by some folks on this page who claim to be a whole lot smarter than me that I was just pulling impossible **** out of my ass.
  20. Maybe people keep bringing up weight because the number of players who have not been major disappointments as outfielders at Sano's weight can be counted on with one hand.
  21. The move to RF should have been Plouffe from day one. Put the guy who has the chance to be the offensive cornerstone of your team for the next decade and a half in the defensive position he played over 90% of his minor league games at. This ain't rocket science. Move Plouffe to the OF to showcase his versatility thus increasing his value for the inevitable trade. Hello McFly (Terry Ryan & Paul Molitor) anybody in there?
  22. Have the Twins ever considered hiring Tommy John as a pitching coach?
  23. My question is how many of those guys on the single season leaderboard had a manager who saw fit to bat them in the # 3 spot in the order? I'd much rather see him hit 4th and have a better chance of having more runners on base which would hopefully lead to him seeing better pitches and replacing a few of those strikeouts with base hits and home runs. If Buxton struggles in the 9 spot this only becomes magnified for Sano at 3. I'd put him in the 4 hole and hopefully not move him for a decade and a half.
×
×
  • Create New...