I liked your post because it was civil and punctuated properly! I also liked the use of and/or. And I maybe/must have been contradictory/confusing, because: 1. Under no circumstances do/did I want TR back. 2. I have been clear, crystal, forever. IF you can trade BD for a solid SP, i.e. a #3, then pull the pin. This is based on our very clear, crystal, need for SP. In another place, other than TwinsWorld, I would probably not do that, but the need for pitching trumps all. And there are limited resources here to acquire said arms. 3. Extending Dozier past his 32 year, to me, seems a poor idea. He is a heavy pull FB oriented HR hitter without the true all fields power of the Cabreras and Sanos of the world. Your going to be buying the end of the line. IMHO. Plus, you trade from excess, and the Twins only excessive is hitting. 4. Such an extension, would have been a TR imperative. Ergo, if the new guy jumps right in and does it, I euphemistically said, "we could just have kept TR". 5. I have been waiting for new leadership for this team, probably longer than most. I was very happy to see TR retire the first time, and would have never brought him back. 6. No the next GM should not be solely judged by his handling of Dozier, it should be judged by the totality of his work over a few years (kind of like my posts are). . But whoever he is, has a bigger mess on his hands than some here like to admit. Somehow the new GM is going to have to convert some of this offense, to pitching and defense. It's gonna be a fun winter. 7. Any mistakes in the previous six points, are solely the function of auto correct!