The posts that I had problems with stated that Sano was lazy/didn't have a good work ethic. People responded why they didn't think Sano was lazy (hard work to rehab TJ surgery, quick to majors, improvement over "down" year, to all-star, etc). Then posters asked why the OP said he thought Sano was lazy and it was because he was smiling during batting practice and getting by on his natural talent, I believe he also said something to the effect that he wasn't able to work hard like Jim Thome did. Essentially, when there have been some questionable posts, I think most of us have given people the benefit of the doubt and asked them to explain why they did things a certain way. No one has jumped at anyone and said "that's racist!" Ted, the author of the Rosario thread that started this, did a good job of explaining his thinking. But some haven't been able to give good reasons and I think we've seen a lot of that in the Sano thread. I do think that there is a difference between someone saying "hey, Sano is lazy and getting by on natural talent b/c he's smiling at batting practice" and someone else saying, "ugh, those are all unsupported accusations and several of them touch on ugly racial stereotypes."