Maybe I should use a different example. On TwinkieTown a couple months ago, some idiot said something about Sano's weight because he was eating too much fried chicken. Horrendously bad thing to say. People called the guy out on it. Now, from there is seems there are two possible options. One, you could look at what you said and read the concerns that others had and say, "holy crap, that's on me. I messed up." Or you could get defensive and attack everyone else, pretend you didn't know fried chicken had any connotation, etc. Guess which one this idiot picked. The point is, we're at a place where people are openly offended at the mere suggestion that they reexamine why they say certain things. This thread questioned why we are ragging on Rosario for not hustling on a pop up. I wondered if we'd have used the same thread title if it wasn't Rosario. (I'm fairly confident we wouldn't have). At that point, maybe someone should say "let's see why did I do that?" And, as Tom answered, he explained why he did that. Tom doesn't seem upset and no one has called him a racist. Tom thought about the issue, considered why he did it and explained it. That should be good for this. What Tom didn't do was attack the people who brought up the questions or showed fake outrage that someone dare question him. That, to me, seems like a good way to move on this.