Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

USAFChief

Twins Daily Contributor
  • Posts

    35,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    578

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by USAFChief

  1. I've, too, often been described as "hardly working."
  2. What I think: You might not build a staff in one offseason, but you don't build one by sitting the offseason out, either. Get started already, for Petesakes...or we'll be having this conversation every year. The Twins WERE positioned to be in contention a couple weeks ago, "sequencing" or not. Adding some quality pitching last offseason would have possibly helped to lower that magic "baseruns" number, added a few wins, and helped avoid this disastrous road trip, where the bullpen is the reason they're not having a winning trip. Side notes: using terms such as "fanciful, laughable" to describe other posters is out of bounds on this place. Please don't. When TD owners pass away and leave me this place in their will (I'm going to outlive them all), I'm going to ban the word "sequencing."
  3. That still left them an entire offseason and spring. There's been a non-trivial change at the top, but we're still waiting for non-trivial change elsewhere. I realize Rome wasn't built in a day, and I still have hopes for the hires, but I'm also not going to give them credit for accomplishments that haven't been accomplished yet.
  4. Here's a list of completed deals last offseason: https://www.sbnation.com/mlb/2016/11/3/13470044/mlb-trade-rumors-tracker-2016-2017-offseason Lots of pitchers changed hands. The Twins are absent from the list, and I find it difficult to believe that's because they couldn't make an effort. And this list is just trades...it doesn't include FA deals.
  5. So is the situation the same going into 2018? 2019? It's forever hopeless? "...not possible" is actually the unrealistic position to take, IMO. Of course it's possible. It certainly takes smarts, courage, and decisiveness. It probably takes money. There will certainly be some luck involved, with injuries if nothing else. But I'm simply not buying "nothing could have been done."
  6. Nobody said it would be easy, but that's the job. "It's too hard, let's do nothing" isn't the answer either.
  7. Concur. concurconcurconcurconcurconcurconcur. Not to mention, it's legal to acquire help between opening day and July 31st, too.
  8. All of that is fair, I just look at it differently. All but the bolded part, that is. I see this often, and it just boggles my mind. If quality relievers are so easy to find, we must have the worst string of GMs in the history of baseball. And one look at the trade deadline should tell you that isn't true...virtually every team in contention is looking for pen help. In actuality, quality relievers are very difficult to find. Highly underrated, too. If it was my money, and I was forced to scrimp somewhere to spend elsewhere, the last place I'd try to limp by is the bullpen. I can find a corner OFer relatively easily, and by perhaps platooning, get decent production with little risk. But when my bullpen is littered with question marks, I'm going to lose lots of games I should have won. Lots. Guar-own-teed.
  9. Speaking only for myself, I'm disappointed that the self-fulfilling prophesy of "we can't compete with these holes" while doing nothing to fill those holes is somehow vindication for yet another wasted season. "Play for 2019" does nothing for me. It's what the de-facto farm teams that always seem to be providing talent to the real teams do.
  10. Sad. Twins had the type of team over the winter that was obviously ready for a step forward, but had some easily identifiable holes. They do virtually nothing to address those holes, then watch as those holes tank a somewhat promising season. Then dump, for what appears to be most likely org filler. Not my idea of how I want this franchise run.
  11. Please explain how the umpires "handled it horribly." Specifically.
  12. It wasn't the umpires fault. Molitor screwed up, then wouldn't admit it post game. If it was the umpire's mistake, don't you think Molitor reacts differently during the game? Sheesh. And don't blame Roberts, either. He did exactly what he should have, and what I'd want Molitor to do. This is big league baseball, not little league.
  13. Molitor dorks up a double switch and you don't think he needs to take the blame? Who should?
  14. I drove 409 miles to see a go ahead 3 run HR on an 0-2 pitch.
  15. we are down the right field line just past 1st base, a couple rows above the beautiful people seats, field level. But tomorrow night, pay attention...look for blue "Twins daily.com" tee shirts when the view is of a LH hitter.
  16. I agree with paragraph 2. Not so much with paragraph 1. Some teams/front offices are very aggressive. Some aren't.
  17. Rogers does not have the same results against LH and RH hitters. That was some awful managing. He shouldn't even have been warming up. Why is your best reliever even warming up in a 6-0 game?
  18. Predicting next inning is difficult. Predicting 2-4 years in the future is next to impossible. But if we're going to do so, I'll predict Burdi never throws a pitch for the Twins
  19. I'm confused. A team in a race, starting Bartolo Colon, has a chance to add an average starter at the cost of a AA reliever 2 months off TJ surgery, and people think that's TOO MUCH?? If so, forget about the Twins ever making a deal.
  20. yeah, stash on the 60 day, but I forget the rule...doesn't such a case still need X number of days on the 25 man to become the claiming team's property?
×
×
  • Create New...