Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

USAFChief

Twins Daily Contributor
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    36,731

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    580

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by USAFChief

  1. USAFChief
    "The first 10,000 fans in attendance will receive nothing." Brilliant.
  2. USAFChief
    I haven't bought that story since it was planted.
  3. USAFChief
    Someone is shoveling hoo-hah. There's zero reason either Detroit or Chicago wouldn't trade a rental to the Twins. Detroit doesn't even play the Twins until 2025. Both teams would be stupid to take a lesser return just to avoid trading in-division. Hell, they would likely welcome taking prospects out of the Twins system. I don't buy that story.
  4. USAFChief
    Maybe. But it seems to me you're mostly upset with sweet, gullible Charlie instead of with evil Lucy. Or at least, that's who you're yelling at.
  5. USAFChief
    How improved? More than the Twins.
  6. USAFChief
    You might want to adjust your sarcasmeter.
  7. USAFChief
    In return for a player they won't even face once. They should be targeting the Twins for a trade.
  8. USAFChief
    It appears, to me at least, as if ownership views St Peter as doing his job well. I mean, they've had him doing it for a long time. Which strengthens my belief they're making money regularly.
  9. USAFChief
    For the record. "Gutted" wasn't my word, it was yours. I don't think they gutted anything in 2022. You won't find posts from me complaining about our FO trying to help the team when its in contention. IMO They should have made an effort again this year. Prospects only purpose is to help the major league team win. I believe in the overwhelming majority of cases they best serve that goal through getting MLB talent in trade. There's always new prospects next year. Look at how that "Gutted" system from 2022 is regarded just 2 years later. I also realize many fans feel differently.
  10. USAFChief
    Yup. And soon, I'd wager.
  11. USAFChief
    All of this is false.
  12. USAFChief
    Personally I'd have rather had Puk than Tanner Scott, but I realize that's prolly a minority opinion.
  13. USAFChief
    So Flaherty was gonna send the Twins deep into the playoffs, make them $$ millions, AND give us bragging rights? That's something Falvine should have avoided??
  14. USAFChief
    Ignore the first four starts. As a reliever: 1.95 ERA. 0.795 WHIP. 10.3 K/9. 7 BB in 32.1 IP. Left handed. History of success. 2.3 years of control. We could have used that
  15. USAFChief
    That's not what was claimed. It was reported the Twins contacted Detroit about Flaherty.
  16. USAFChief
    It doesn't matter if Kepler knows or not. That's not relevant. Did Kepler interfere witha fielder making a play? It's a judgement call. I'd have called it a dead ball, but I can understand the umpires judgement being different than mine.
  17. USAFChief
    The Tigers wouldn't trade Flaherty to the Twins? Flaherty is a two month rental. And the Tigers dont even play the Twins again until 2025. Try again. BTW the best or second best reliever went from Miami to Arizona. Cheaply.
  18. USAFChief
    You doubt the Tigers would listen to an in-division trade for a 2 month rental? When the teams don't even play each other again this season?? Geez, I hope the Tigers are that stupid, but I doubt it.
  19. USAFChief
    What reports? Nobody traded a Jenkins, Lee or Rodriguez.
  20. USAFChief
    Try Dobnak for 2?
  21. USAFChief
    Agree, except I don't think it needs rewritten. It's a judgement call, always will be, and we just need better judgement by the umpire. There was interference, just not interference with an actual play. "Dead ball. Play on."
  22. USAFChief
    Weak call.
  23. USAFChief
    Good swing Mr Lee. Unnoticed by the broadcast team, but good swing.
  24. USAFChief
    How many leads will Pablo hold today? Let's hope the answer is 1.
  25. USAFChief
    OK Pablo. Make that enough.
×
×
  • Create New...