The more I think about it, the more this FO has been at least partially hamstrung by the old FO. Signing Park last year gave us an abundance of 1B/DH types. That was a problem this FO had to try to resolve. No front office would cut Mauer at this point, even if he is a shadow of his former self. His former self still sells a lot of jerseys and milk.Vargas is still young - coming into his age 26 season - with a minor league OPS of .849, and showing flashes of power and hitting that we'd all love to see in the lineup daily if he can put it together.Park had a terrible year last year. The Park Bangs, when he connected, were fantastic. But other than some ooh and aah home runs, he was very Tim Laudner. And he has a significantly larger contract than Vargas.The new FO, in a fit of trying to fix a mess from the old FO, decided that we couldn't keep three 1B/DHs on the roster. They can't let Mauer go. That leaves Vargas and Park. They calculated (correctly), that no team would grab Park (and his contract) after hitting .191 last year. After that, there was very little chance that the team would go north with Park, even if he hit Park Bangs every other at bat. I'm not sure how 40 man rosters are assembled. I don't know if they know exactly how many hitters they want vs pitchers, or how much flexibility there is. Personally, I don't get the dance they did on Rule V day to get Haley, and I don't get why they are willing to keep him on the roster now, unless Boston is just playing crazy hardball with their trade requests. I don't get why Tonkin has been kept. Or at least why both Haley and Tonkin are kept. But why Park isn't on the roster? It was an attempt to fix a 2016 problem. Park surprised everyone this spring, you know? That's a good thing. I hope he keeps it up in the minors and the FO is forced to make another move, and/or that they are already trying to make another move.