I think this is fair, and I can give Dozier the benefit of the doubt to a degree...but there are a few things going on that make me scratch my head a bit. The GM tells the reporter that the player needs to get fixed, the reporter tells the player (assuming linear facts and storytelling, which may be a big assumption), and the player's response is to smile and shake his head? Then, at the end of the story, the same player declares himself "the leader of the team?" There's something wrong there. First, I'm not sure I've ever heard anybody on the team say anything to the effect of "Dozier is the guy we follow." I'm not saying it isn't out there, but I don't know that I get that feeling that anyone in that locker room is ready to go to war for Dozier. Second, if you really are the leader, and you're hitting .199, and you are informed that the GM says you need to get fixed, don't you pause for a minute and recognize that the buck stops with your performance? If you are the leader, don't you at least say, "boy, I wish he was wrong, but he's not. I really have to find a way to change what is happening." You can still say that you've been feeling good and hitting the ball square, but how do you not agree with the statement that adjustments need to be made? I hope he sits for 3-4 games. Then, I hope he recognizes that maybe there are some adjustments that need to be made. Then, I hope he makes them. Then, if he doesn't after about a week, I hope he goes to AAA until he does.