Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    46,387
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Fangraphs had him 110th.....here is the summary: Athletic enigma who has dealt with injury issues, which may have masked his skills.
  2. I don't know that it is "extremely likely he'll break down".....which is very different than an increase of some percent he gets injured....
  3. how do you know that last part is true? I just can't see how we know that at all.
  4. Well, Jorge was a temporary thing....but I forgot about him. It's not any kind of judgement by me at all, I'm just trying to figure out how they are going to work....
  5. I think that depends on how he starts out....but likely 3 years at least. Unless his bat is so awesome it can't be waited on....
  6. In their summary, FG said he had a chance to stay behind the plate. Better? Non zero chance is how scouts talk about a guy that has a chance, but isn't likely. They don't give an actual percentage because that's kind of silly.
  7. It was. I was saying if they keep to type, they are going to need to start making trades to have pitchers
  8. https://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/day-one-draft-recap/
  9. Gonna need pitchers too. Or be willing to trade highly valued prospects.
  10. No. It means he has a chance to stay at catcher, unlike some others. It's the opposite of what you just typed.
  11. Rooker, now these two. They appear to have a type.
  12. Why not take the player they like now? They don't pick for some time.....
  13. To what end? They can't save much money at this point.
  14. Number 77 on fangraphs.... Here is their summary.... Big catcher with non-zero chance to stay back there and above-average raw power
  15. Isn't that true of every pick? I'm not sure what your point is.
  16. Fangraphs... Big catcher with non-zero chance to stay back there and above-average raw power
  17. If they hit on half, it's a great draft.
  18. That's my take also. Given the minor league depth I would have been more willing to roll the dice than this appears to be.
  19. Not sure how you get that from those scores. He'll be on teh fringe of top 100 overall players, most likely, and in the top5 or so for the Twins (on most national lists).
  20. I'm not at all surprised it is a college player. Hope he's good!
  21. That field score doesn't jibe with the FG report that teams are worried about his D....I asked on the FG chat for clarification.....
  22. FG writeup: Larnach is a physical beast with massive exit velos/raw power and surprising contact skills but limited defensive value. Full Report Larnach hits low-lying lasers, with several balls off the bat in excess of 115mph during Oregon State's opening weekend in Arizona. If sneaky plus-plus raw power exists, Larnach has it, as he generates it without taking max-effort hacks. There are teams that don't like Larnach in this range because they think he's a bad defender and/or they are concerned about his 20% strikeout rate, But Larnach's career 15% walk rate should help satiate the stat-driven people in draft rooms and his power numbers could take a jump if pro instruction coaxes more lift out of his swing. He checks every box for the risk-averse, analytics-driven clubs, which means he has a lot of potential homes in the 10-20 range. https://www.fangraphs.com/scoutboard.aspx?draft=2018mlb&type=0&pos=all&team=all
  23. Number 12 on the FG board...... They really are going to have to trade for / sign pitchers.....
×
×
  • Create New...