Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

Mike Sixel

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    48,925
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    340

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by Mike Sixel

  1. Hence give me a long term deal and time to fix it.
  2. Sure, but how do you fix the rest of the team in your first scenario, or even second? They have few picks and no money in your first scenario.
  3. That's some bad grading on a curve. If I can't get an A because someone else got every question right plus somehow graded all the papers so the teacher could relax, that's not a realistic bar.
  4. The D is terrible. How would you fix that in one year, given they can't sign a single free agent if they take a48 million cap hit. No gM can build a team in one year. Plus, what if you bet wrong on Lance? It's not realistic. Show me a path.....
  5. None of those pitchers got the twins anywhere last year. By your logic, they aren't worth signing. Ohtani didn't carry the Angels to the playoffs..... You don't think he's worth signing next year? I don't really understand the logic in saying player X was not good enough to carry a team, so he's not worth signing.
  6. Why? Just go with Farmer. He's better.
  7. I'd ask the owner for a five year deal if I was the GM and coach if that's the plan, because it would be years to recover. Years. They have no draft capital. And this year's draft looks bad
  8. If I'm the GM I try to trade down and get another third and a backup player that has upside. I look for guys that were hurt that need a shot to prove they are healthy. If I'm committed to the 3-4, and someone will give me at least a first for Hunter, I do it, though I'd move back to a 4 3 and keep him. I try very, very, hard to deal Cook and keep Mattison. I'm looking for DBs, again, and much faster LBers. Frankly, I'd look for a fast tweener that is an over sized safety to play one LB position. I also look to get a center, if Bradbury leaves. No idea how to do all that with the picks they have. As for QB, sure, if an upside guy wants to come here and sit behind Kirk, great. But good luck with that.
  9. Of the available free agents, only the RPs are certain to be good options relative to current players, other than the two SS. And Rodon, but they aren't signing him to seven, or even five, years. I don't see any advantage to signing a reclamation project in the OF, unless they don't feel their guys are healthy. They have plenty of pitchers who look like number four or five starters, don't need those. Of course I'd love for them to add more great players, there just aren't many left in free agency.
  10. Outside the RP..... Who would you cut to sign one of these guys? Some of them are downright not good.
  11. They are not mutually exclusive. I think you've made your point, and I've made mine. I think the bigger problem for the sport is three true outcome baseball.
  12. Trading Kepler is what the Rays would do at this point.....
  13. And he's hurt a lot, not what you want in Buxton insurance.
  14. Lewis moves to left and center when Buxton is hurt. Lee plays third or second or right field. Miranda moves to DH or first. They aren't close to having a logjam. Or, one of them is dealt as part of a deal for a very good pitcher.
  15. Most of those are downgrades. Yikes. I like the RPs..... But that's about it, I think.
  16. Udoh is now your backup LT. Let's hope Darrisaw is ok. Both for him and the rest of the team.
  17. I'm not sure what the As are doing, other than trying to have the lowest payroll.
  18. Everything I read online says Oakland got nothing. A bunch of backups with low ceilings. We'll see in a couple years, but it's hard to imagine they couldn't get one great prospect.
  19. Not a huge needle mover, but an improvement for sure.
  20. They have Danielle and Zadarius and can't get any pressure. That's the coaches.
  21. You totally put words in my mouth.
  22. If they fall at signing CC and Rodon, I guess you punt and start over. Which makes no sense given an the prospects they dealt last year. Lopez or a different Miami pitcher? If SF signs CC, I want Crawford here. No way I trade for a RP. They are flush in options there.
×
×
  • Create New...