Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

TL

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    260

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TL

  1. TL
    Love that he is playing some CF. With analytics helping to better place infielders to where the ball is likely to go (the shift) it feels like CF may be over-taking SS as the most important defensive position. Plus with Buxton’s injury history and potential remaining bad blood due to service time manipulation he may not be long-term at CF for the Twins. From what I’ve seen written he has a chance to be an excellent CF.
  2. TL
    Paying an extra 4-6MM while limiting it to a 1 year deal is a fair trade off if I'm the Twins. They have only one starter returning with decisions to make on the other 4. I foresee a trade for a top starter and then bringing back one or both of Pineda and Odoriizzi. Hell I may extend them each a QO and hope they both take it or bring back a draft pick.
  3. TL
    I’m loving the young and talented MLB team with a very strong pipeline of prospects at virtually every position. We need a couple more guys to break out and become all stars, and several have that ability. I’m not against making a splash in free agency either given low ‘19 payroll and fact that minors will replenish the team with minimum salary guys over next few years.
  4. TL

    8.5 back

    TL replied to ffwfed31's topic in Minnesota Twins Talk

    I would go so far as to say it is very likely the offense is significantly better in the second half. Dozier, Kepler, Polanco, Morrison should all be much better, and a larger dose of playing time for Garver will also help. That’s 5 right there. And then hopefully Sano and Buxton (even if for defense only) could also really help. Then you trade Lynn and have Romero take that spot with Santana also coming back and contributing as a decent back end arm will upgrade the rotation. These things happening may not overtake the Indians unless they slump but it’s not crazy to think Twins can win 65% of games in second half.
  5. TL
    I count at least 10 guys currently in the minors that they should be looking to get plenty of playing time in the second half in order to have a better sense of what they should be looking for going into 2019 (and for Santana perhaps to see if there is any trade value prior to July 31). Starters: Romero, Santana, May, Gonsalves Relievers: Moya, Busenitz, Curtiss Batters: Gordon, Buxton, Sano Hopefully they can trade multiple guys in a package to get a better quality prospect or two in return.
  6. TL
    Really impressed with the farm system this year and continued development. Nice to see a few power guys (Kirilloff, Rooker) complimenting the middle infield hitting prospects. Seems to be a down year for the MLB club but future continues to be bright and now includes starting pitching help too.
  7. TL
    Setting aside risk of injury for a moment the questions becomes one of effectiveness. I think you need to keep Romero’s innings low to make sure his arm is not fatigued come Sept/Oct. Really like the idea of piggybacking him with May initially, and then perhaps Santana does the same with Berrios for a while. After the all star break you can reassess and hopefully young and previously injured guys are ready for the stretch run. Interesting question whether that is a better strategy for keeping a guy fresh versus skipping a turn in the rotation now and then.
  8. TL
    I think he’s getting in. The point made by DocBauer on how today’s voters will look at post-concussion performance is a good one and I think his numbers/comparisons plus that enlightenment is going to assure him a spot.
  9. TL
    Blackmon turned in a great 2017 season at the right time it seems, and he was probably worth more to the Rockies than anyone else (shades of Joe Mauer 2009). Dozier is a great player but not of same value to the Twins given their middle infield depth and the young star power on the team. Nor is he likely to be of equal value to other teams given what we have seen in contracts for second baseman recently. I would love to sign him for 3 years at ~$60MM and trade a young middle infielder like Gordon for help at the deadline or in the offseason. That would have more immediate value to the team as well as future value as opposed to letting Dozier walk with just a qualifying offer. At 4 years I may do it but the AAV needs to come down.
  10. TL
    Setting up the team for the next decade may also consist of trading one or more of these guys away to replenish the system.
  11. TL
    Best part is none of the above is all that difficult to imagine! Buxton and Kepler almost have to get off to a better start and hit lefties better respectively. Rosario cutting down on swings outside the zone may be most unlikely but still I think there is a pretty good chance given the trajectory.
  12. TL
    I feel really badly for him and thought he really had a chance to take offf and solidify his future as a major leaguer this year. Now that is on hold and will be tough to get his job back if the Twins are competitive given the fact he cannot play in the post season. Looking ahead to next season though there is a potential silver lining. If Adrianza proves valuable at SS and can hit to a league average OPS then it’s so much easier to move Polanco to 2B if Dozier isn’t resigned. Or gives the team another trade chip (either one of them) if Dozier is signed.
  13. TL
    Good article and I’m also looking forward to seeing Polanco in ‘18 with a hopefully more consistent year at the plate (that is closer to his second half of ‘17 than the first). Regarding defense, I’m wondering if, with the new-found appreciation for launch angles and balls hit in the air, whether the value of defense at SS has declined somewhat. Not suggesting it is equivalent of first base in terms of value, but perhaps having an average or slightly below average defender is not quite the disadvantage that the common wisdom used to tell us. I’ve seen articles playing up the value of OF defense in this era and I’m thinking that must naturally come with a corresponding decrease in value of SS defense.
  14. TL
    This is a strange situation. Based on recent free agent deals for second basemen it feels like he is not going to get what he rightfully thinks he’s worth ($15MM+/year over 4-5 years, and that is even low). I would bet he ends up getting what the Twins would be more than happy to pay but with other, younger and less proven, guys on the team set to cash in soon will his pride cause him to walk? I hope not. Would love to see him back on a 3 year deal and use some of the surplus middle infielders as trade chips at the right time.
  15. TL
    A Drew Butera type is always available for almost nothing if needed. Good to see them with an actual strategy behind the plate at the MLB level (Garver on tough lefties) with potential to make the position a strength.
  16. TL
    Good article. Agree feels like a good set up and with catcher wear and tear it’s nice to have a backup that can be used in a more strategic manner rather than simply “personal catcher” or when the starter needs a day off regardless of the match up.
  17. TL
    To sum up, nobody thinks the Twins got fleeced; everybody would have made the same deal, but he may be more of a 4/5 than a 2/3. There are significant red flags that could indicate we will be disappointed when he is taking up innings that would otherwise be going to a promising youngster. But, we are also putting faith in the Twins new front office and pitching coach that they can tweak something and get him back to above league average. Looking back at comments and articles this offseason it’s clear many thought the Rays would get a much more highly touted return. There are suggestions Kepler would not be out of the question, and this tweet from Berardino, “#Rays remain open to dealing RHP Jake Odorizzi (among others) but have made it clear to potential trade partners they will have to "extend" to get their attention.” Great job Falvine!
  18. TL
    I don’t mean to throw cold water on the hype but Walker and Palka had similar (slightly better?) strikeout rates at A+. If he can bring that down to ~25% as he advances to double and triple A I’ll be more excited. Otherwise, we can probably anticipate the MLB strikeout rate being in the high 30s, which will be problematic.
  19. TL
    While still concerning, that dip in velocity his senior year must be the reason he dropped out of the first round (where all bonuses were > $2MM). A plus curve, 94 MPH fastball, projectable frame and good control at 18 years old seems like a recipe for high first rounder. Twins may have gotten very lucky he dropped - and then executed the strategy perfectly to grab him in round 3 with an over-slot bonus.
  20. TL
    If the Twins were able to sign Darvish I’d go hard after Archer too. Instant rotation of a contender! Giving up Kepler is tough though. Good all around player with, I think, significantly more to come with the bat.
  21. TL
    Hughes money is gone, let it go. I can’t imagine a team that hopes to contend would waste a spot on a guy only because they owe him so much money. The money is gone either way. If he is as good an option as another bullpen arm and that other arm can be stashed in Rochester and not accue service time, then fine. But if it means losing Pressly or another guy who has a future beyond ‘18 then he has to be the odd man out.
  22. TL
    It will be expensive, but nothing compared to what it would be after next year if he even has a similar year as ‘17. I agree with bighat that it may be now or never. If we wait and still sign him later it may come at the expense of being able to keep the core together (Kepler, Sano, Berrios, etc) or having dollars to sign free agents. And if it turns out in a few years Royce is not a SS but instead a top CF prospect who is blocked by Buxton, then so much the better as we can trade him for a top starter or whatever we may need at the time.
  23. TL
    Great analysis! It seems that there is a good chance the BABIP was low due to luck. I wonder if the infield fly rate could also be partly due to him making an adjustment and learning to change his launch angle, which could pay off in 2018. I’ve always felt like he would begin to hit lefties, mostly because he did it in the minors (at least the last season in AA). This analysis gives me even more hope he is going to take it to another level this year.
  24. TL
    So many tough calls to make and any of them could go very right or blow up and look foolish. I’m of the opinion you look to win in ‘18 (weaker division, at least wild card there for the taking) while not sacrificing the ‘19 - ‘21 window. In my dreams: 1. Sign Darvish 2. Trade for Archer (must give up Sano in order to keep younger elite prospects) 3. Extend Santana 2 years (pick up ‘19 option and add 2 years for $25MM?) 4. Extend Dozier 3 years ($45MM? Strong ‘18 FA class could depress his value if he hits open market) 5. Sign Frazier to play 3B (3 for $36MM?) 6. Hope Vargas can mash at DH 7. Romero and May to the bullpen That doesn’t seem all that unrealistic. The ‘18 staff would be excellent (those 3 above + Berrios) and all signed through at least ‘21. Guys start coming off the books when we have to (hopefully) pay Buxton and Berrios superstar money, and guys like Lewis and Gonsalves start hitting their stride as young, cheap and high upside replacements in ‘22 and beyond. I’d have to check what payoll would look like to see if that works. If not then can forego either Dozier or Frazier and have Escobar/Gordon fill in.
  25. TL
    “If you love someone, set them free. If they come back they're yours; if they don't they never were.” The Burdi move is a mystery or at least I don’t know how to truly think about whether he ends up being offered back, with the DL rules. But if they plan to add to the 40 man through free agency or trades then instead of designating Bard for assignment isn’t it more likely they retain him long-term by losing him in the rule 5?
×
×
  • Create New...