Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

TL

Verified Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    196

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TL

  1. TL
    To sum up, nobody thinks the Twins got fleeced; everybody would have made the same deal, but he may be more of a 4/5 than a 2/3. There are significant red flags that could indicate we will be disappointed when he is taking up innings that would otherwise be going to a promising youngster. But, we are also putting faith in the Twins new front office and pitching coach that they can tweak something and get him back to above league average. Looking back at comments and articles this offseason it’s clear many thought the Rays would get a much more highly touted return. There are suggestions Kepler would not be out of the question, and this tweet from Berardino, “#Rays remain open to dealing RHP Jake Odorizzi (among others) but have made it clear to potential trade partners they will have to "extend" to get their attention.” Great job Falvine!
  2. TL
    I don’t mean to throw cold water on the hype but Walker and Palka had similar (slightly better?) strikeout rates at A+. If he can bring that down to ~25% as he advances to double and triple A I’ll be more excited. Otherwise, we can probably anticipate the MLB strikeout rate being in the high 30s, which will be problematic.
  3. TL
    While still concerning, that dip in velocity his senior year must be the reason he dropped out of the first round (where all bonuses were > $2MM). A plus curve, 94 MPH fastball, projectable frame and good control at 18 years old seems like a recipe for high first rounder. Twins may have gotten very lucky he dropped - and then executed the strategy perfectly to grab him in round 3 with an over-slot bonus.
  4. TL
    Hughes money is gone, let it go. I can’t imagine a team that hopes to contend would waste a spot on a guy only because they owe him so much money. The money is gone either way. If he is as good an option as another bullpen arm and that other arm can be stashed in Rochester and not accue service time, then fine. But if it means losing Pressly or another guy who has a future beyond ‘18 then he has to be the odd man out.
  5. TL
    It will be expensive, but nothing compared to what it would be after next year if he even has a similar year as ‘17. I agree with bighat that it may be now or never. If we wait and still sign him later it may come at the expense of being able to keep the core together (Kepler, Sano, Berrios, etc) or having dollars to sign free agents. And if it turns out in a few years Royce is not a SS but instead a top CF prospect who is blocked by Buxton, then so much the better as we can trade him for a top starter or whatever we may need at the time.
  6. TL
    Great analysis! It seems that there is a good chance the BABIP was low due to luck. I wonder if the infield fly rate could also be partly due to him making an adjustment and learning to change his launch angle, which could pay off in 2018. I’ve always felt like he would begin to hit lefties, mostly because he did it in the minors (at least the last season in AA). This analysis gives me even more hope he is going to take it to another level this year.
  7. TL
    So many tough calls to make and any of them could go very right or blow up and look foolish. I’m of the opinion you look to win in ‘18 (weaker division, at least wild card there for the taking) while not sacrificing the ‘19 - ‘21 window. In my dreams: 1. Sign Darvish 2. Trade for Archer (must give up Sano in order to keep younger elite prospects) 3. Extend Santana 2 years (pick up ‘19 option and add 2 years for $25MM?) 4. Extend Dozier 3 years ($45MM? Strong ‘18 FA class could depress his value if he hits open market) 5. Sign Frazier to play 3B (3 for $36MM?) 6. Hope Vargas can mash at DH 7. Romero and May to the bullpen That doesn’t seem all that unrealistic. The ‘18 staff would be excellent (those 3 above + Berrios) and all signed through at least ‘21. Guys start coming off the books when we have to (hopefully) pay Buxton and Berrios superstar money, and guys like Lewis and Gonsalves start hitting their stride as young, cheap and high upside replacements in ‘22 and beyond. I’d have to check what payoll would look like to see if that works. If not then can forego either Dozier or Frazier and have Escobar/Gordon fill in.
  8. TL
    “If you love someone, set them free. If they come back they're yours; if they don't they never were.” The Burdi move is a mystery or at least I don’t know how to truly think about whether he ends up being offered back, with the DL rules. But if they plan to add to the 40 man through free agency or trades then instead of designating Bard for assignment isn’t it more likely they retain him long-term by losing him in the rule 5?
  9. TL
    This. Twins will have much more flexibility to make splashy trades with a deep farm system, as well as the increased likelihood that one or two of the guys from a deep system will exceed expectations. The other strategy I’d like to see employed more often is in years where their payroll is on the lower end due to playing a lot of young guys not arb eligible (like the last few years), they use money on a higher priced veteran with an eye toward a deadline trade if they are not in contention. Another path to adding “assets”.
  10. TL
    I’m glad to hear the Twins aren’t looking at their system and thinking they have enough shortstops. They don’t stick that often and can move almost anywhere. After keeping Braves money and adding another $2MM + I guess he wanted to go where he saw the quickest path. Understandable.
  11. TL
    Using the money (at no actual expense) versus not using it is the obviously right decision. Had to look it up to confirm but the money does not roll over so it would have been lost. The only question I have is whether they used it to acquire the right player(s). The Angels just signed Kevin Maitan for $2.2MM of international bonus money after his contract with the Braves was voided due to the international signing scandal. He was a top 50 prospect in all of baseball. Who knows if we could have signed him if we threw more $ at him or if we tried, but that would appear on its face to be a better usage of that money than the two we got. Time will tell though and Falvine’s moves thus far in acquiring young talent have been impressive (e.g., 2017 Draft + 2017 Trades).
  12. TL
    This makes you think about the calculus around “readiness” for a major league promotion for defense-first guys. The process seems to largely focus on offense today, assuming the defense will be there when the offense finally comes around. Perhaps some of those guy’s maximum MLB values start earlier. It’s incredible what an elite defense can do for a pitching staff and a team even if not obvious looking at the typical stats. A good defensive catcher and full year of Buxton made a huge difference. Imagine an elite SS to go with this group.
  13. TL
    I gotta say, the grass isn’t always greener. Dozier is putting up 4+ WAR and has turned himself into a dangerous hitter. Who knows if Polanco and Gordon will ever reach that. But the other thing to consider is that we also don’t have a real DH (assuming Sano can stick and 3B or slide to 1B in 2019). If one of Gordon or Polanco can prove to handle short and the other 2B then Dozier becomes a solid option for DH as his defense declines. That said, 3 year extension for me.
×
×
  • Create New...