Agreed with what Duluth Fan said about RBI. For example, final score is 3-1, we look at the box score and see: 4 1 1 3 , and it's a good bet it was a 3-run homer. But for a long time, the papers didn't run the RBI column, so you saw: 4 1 1 and the guy above him 4 1 1 and the guy above him 4 1 1. So at some point RBI was meaningful enough to change the way the regular fan interpreted the game. The other problem is it's getting rarer and rarer that our first knowledge of a completed ball game is by reading a boxscore, so RBI is starting to lose ground. But I do think its fun for comparing elite hitters against each other, like Ortiz vs Cabrera vs Ryan Braun etc. and it's not going away as a Triple Crown stat. In my opinion, the most useless stat you'll find in a newspaper box score is the Hold. Eighth inning, leading 5-1, come in to pitch with the bases loaded, give up a bases-clearing double on the first pitch, get an out, and then you walk the bases loaded again. Your lead is down to a run, 5-4, and you get yanked. Congratulations, you've earned a "Hold" for not surrendering the lead in a save situation. An agent must have thought up that stat.