This discussion has been music to my ears! lol
My defense of Rocco, such as it is, is that Rocco doesn’t look much different to me than a bunch of other managers in the game right now. Same with this front office, I guess.
I think we are in a period where fundamentals have been downplayed, in favor of data, and maybe we are exiting that cycle now. I don’t know. This is very anecdotal, but a few times during the last few seasons, I have seen a player on the other team look frankly no better than a typical minor leaguer (still very good I might add) batting and fielding, and think to myself, how is this guy in the majors? And then I check his exit velocities, and they are very high. The Twins have players like this too. Carlos Correa is very good and has very high exit velocity, which maybe played a part in his signing. Luis Arraez, terrible exit velocity. Traded.
And we see many teams maybe think they are going to be the real innovators, to use the wonderful example above, but are all really doing the same thing. I don’t know. Maybe that makes them really to be codifiers or exploiters.
That old Far Side cartoon comes to mind, of the single penguin among thousands, shouting “I’ve got to be me!”
The Twins are one of the penguins who look like all the other penguins to me.
I have been waiting for some smart baseball writer out there to publish that seminal essay of our time about Why The Game Has Changed, but have yet to see it. Because in the StatCast era, I really think it has.
However, this does not explain the massive collapse at the end of this season, which interests me.
The teams we see in both league’s championship series this season (or at least 3 or them) strike me as strong in many or most of the fundamental things teams traditionally have worked for—scouting, development, coaching, culture, yes analytics, taking the right risks, and yes money plays a role. The Dodgers and Yankees are not where they are solely because of their market or payroll, not in my opinion.