It's important to note his clarification that if a Muslim rejected Sharia Law than he would support that person for President, however at that point it becomes about whether Muslims would consider that person actually a Muslim, or as Carson put it in his clarification an infidel or heretic. Have you read the Sharia Law? I find it hard to believe that liberals of all people would want someone in office that believed in Sharia Law. You talk about the war on women. I think this may be a case of the evil you know is better than the one you don't. I am actually a libertarian, but I agree with Carson that I don't want someone in office that wants to implement Sharia Law and I think that should not be that outlandish of a statement. So then you wonder what makes the media/people jump all over this statement. Is it that he's a Republican or a Christian? I don't think so. I think it falls more towards that he's not a career politician or something you hit on it may be more sinister and about his own actual race rather than religion. I think the Republican party doesn't really like him because he isn't a career politician and some in my honest opinion don't want a black person running for office. It's that kind of mentality that has doomed the party in previous elections. However, I think the difference here is Democrats/Media took the bait this time for whatever ulterior motives they may have. But as to your question yeah I guess I am defending Carson, however I think he should have been much more clear when he talked about it the first time. Unfortunately enough for him people don't really care about clarifications they will only read the headlines and come up with their own motives behind what he said. He is about the only person on the republican ticket I can get behind so it looks like Libertarians, or at least me, head towards another rock and a hard place when it comes time to pick.