Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

mikelink45

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    10,087
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by mikelink45

  1. Glad to have rooker on the team again. Not sure how he replaces Donaldson since he's outfield and Donaldson is infield. But I do look at cave and wonder how he continues to be a favorite as the fourth outfielder.
  2. I am confused. If they were going to let him go 100 pitches why did the Buxton home run change the equation. Let him go until there's a hit. I still think it's a great honor for a pitcher to throw a no-hitter
  3. I like the relief pitchers and the outfielders. The others are not that exciting.
  4. We don't know how long Donaldson will be out and when the next problem will arise. It really begins to feel like Sano is our only real third Base option. The rest fill in but we know he can actually play the position. Then rooker and Kiriloff or Larnach work. So we will tune in tomorrow and see what the doctors report is and keep hoping that our four-year contract isn't like buxton's career so far.
  5. Wow does this game bring out the emotions. One loss - 161 games to go, but it really did hurt.
  6. Nice summary. I look forward to the matchups.
  7. I think it stinks. If we are going to ignore our minor league prospects get stars to hold them back, not someone who marginally out does them in ST.
  8. Nice records. I guess I will watch Miggy in Detroit go for the big records. In the mean time what I want is 100 wins for the team.
  9. Cave is not on my personal list, If Buxton goes down we need to reach into the minors where we have our next CF - Celestino. SS is not well backed up and neither is 3B. I see Garlick fading after one month in time for the Kiriloff call up. Garver has not hit well this spring, he did not hit well last season. We have to stop talking about his good bat until he shows that he found it again. Kepler is ready to go now that he had his 1 for 33 stretch in ST - right? I hope he blasts his way to erasing that debacle. Buxton (172), Cave (219), Garver (172) and Sano (159) have to leave their ST numbers behind. I left Simmons off the list because of his late start. I forget - ST Stats don't matter unless you are Kiriloff.
  10. Too many names - next take those names and tell us what you think of 2021 likeliness. They cannot use all these. Some are going to fall off quickly. If you took all your 40 man, non roster and other categories and ranked them from top to bottom that would tell me more. If Sabato has a real chance for this year I did not see it in the ST games I watched. But I do wonder if those who came in during the current FO regime get a higher chance to make it.
  11. In 1976 he had Carew, Wynegar, Smalley, Hisle, Bostock, Cubbage, Ford and Randall - not a bad lineup. Goltz and Blyleven led an otherwise blah pitching staff and Campbell was an outstanding RP. Same lineup and SP Goltz and Zahn led the staff in 1977. Then Erickson, Goltz and Zahn with Mike Marshall in the pen. There were some horses here.
  12. Does a platoon of Garlick and Cave in LF sound like a part of a championship team? If not Kiriloff, if not Rooker, then Larnach. Upside and youth. Now if Kepler does not produce, if Buxton gets injured the OF suddenly looks subpar. The BP has some very shaky vets. Lets hope that everyone finds their stroke, rises to the challenges and all ST worries disappear.
  13. Garlick and Cave - suddenly the starting lineup does not look as productive as we imagined. Sorry Rooker can't field. I do understand that. Since Kiriloff did not make it although at the time of the cut he was hitting better than Cave, I would have liked to seen Larnach get the chance. I like upside, I like infusion of youth.
  14. Remember that Mauch never won a pennant - he was aggressive but not always right.
  15. The end of ST - before the start of the season is time to dream any dream.
  16. As one of the posters who consistently puts Cave down, I appreciate your essay, but it does not go far enough. What is Cave's future versus Rooker or others? I am not a fan of Cave and do not like the idea that he blocks possible young talent that can do so much more.
  17. Disappointed that both Rooker and Kiriloff are sent down and Garlick who is also seeing his numbers diminish is kept. What does that say to prospects? I think there needs to be some concern over how young players are judged and handled. I am also interested in how the ST stats don't count comments can be used both to justify release and justify retention. Do they count or don't they? Inconsistency is really a bad thing.
  18. Actually Cleveland manages its money, but does not dump and rebuilds. They have a system unlike anyone else and they stay competitive.
  19. I agree to your picks, but would love to see SD beat out LA. The Mets seem to be one of those teams that always self destructs so I do not trust them. The Cardinals improved, but if they were put into another division they could not win.
  20. Given that this is a Cleveland model - if he does well he will be traded in two or three years - think Clevinger, Bauer, Carrasco, Plutko...
  21. Is that more than he made driving Uber? Grab the money Randy!
  22. Very nice article and depth is always a question and hard to analyze. I am partial to Celestino if Buxton is down for a prolonged period. I have to say that covering all the spots with sufficient backup is a real difficulty. You laid out a good plan and of course Sano and Cruz are backed up by Larnach, Rooker, Kiriloff. 3B is the weakest of the positions for a long term solution. Luckily the starting pitching depth seems to be in place with Thorpe and Dobnak, I just wish I had more faith in Happ and Shoemaker. The BP is the weakest and the backups that I watched in today's ST RP game do not give me as much comfort as the other position backups.
  23. I am disappointed that Kiriloff was not given another week. Baseball is notorious for slumps and he might have busted out just like we are hoping Buxton, Kepler, Sano, Garver, Cave all see their bats wake up. I worry that Garlick is getting so much attention. His BA is falling, his Ks are rising. Yes he leads in HRs this spring (ST stats don't count?) but there are a lot of weaknesses as we say in the game yesterday. Five AB - one HR - 3 Ks
  24. I disagreed with the home-centric grading of the position players, but the loss of Jiminez makes them even. I give the Twins the fielding prize so I slightly grade the Twins over the Sox. In SP I give Berrios and Maeda the overwhelming lead, but I am not a Pineda fan. I see his seven year performance, less performance enhancing additives as average SP. Happ has looked terrible this spring, Shoemaker is ???? Give me Randy and the SP is better for the Twins than the Sox. The BP has not looked good this spring - neither Robles or Colome have shined and Rogers looks like the same guy that disappointed us last season so we need to win the SP side of this equation. At this point we are even and it means a really tense and good season, especially if Kepler is not leading off and the team remembers how to hit. And finally, am I the only one who questions why Cave is so secure as the fourth OF?
  25. I would rather use a pitcher who has a future with us than one that is a one year fill in.
×
×
  • Create New...