Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

The Great Hambino

Verified Member
  • Posts

    1,901
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

 Content Type 

Profiles

News

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospects Ranking

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

Minnesota Twins Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Pick Tracker

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by The Great Hambino

  1. My understanding is this: control = throwing strikes command = putting the pitch where you want and making it move the way you want Say there’s two sliders thrown. One hangs a bit or misses the spot but still hits the strike zone. That shows control but not command. The next one has the sharp break that puts it in the bottom corner of the strike zone just as the pitcher intended to induce a whiff. That shows command and control I think it’s really splitting hairs personally. Hanging a fat pitch middle-middle shouldn’t be considered good control even if it happens to be a strike. To me, command is what’s relevant by these definitions
  2. The Pohlads are Rachel Phelps without an end game
  3. "With the new business arrangement in place, the Twins are looking to restructure a front office that grew exponentially in terms of resources and positions in the past five years, a team source said. The Twins had leaned less on their pro scouting department in recent years, heavily reducing those scouts’ travel budgets and requiring them to mainly do video-based scouting. The team’s pro personnel department, which was already scouting via video, will handle the club’s pro scouting duties moving forward, a source confirmed."
  4. A nice glimpse into the kind of "fresh ideas" the limited partners are bringing to the table
  5. Per Dan Hayes, the Twins have eliminated their entire pro scouting department to save money. I'm sure those savings are going right into next year's bullpen 🤡
  6. Buxton definitely gunning for 30/30. Something to root for I guess. Better than half the lineup v. Mendoza, anyway
  7. I could go for a six-pack of Schlittlers right about now
  8. Remember, all they need is Zebby and another dozen or so guys like him to play better next year than they ever have before to be right back in contention!
  9. Is Fitzgerald afraid of the ball? That was weird
  10. RUNS BATTED IN* <ducks for cover> You just want to see this board devolve into culture war chaos, don't you shortround? Or should I say Arthur Fleck? *I am joking. Or am I?
  11. 16-12 against the AL East (93 win pace) 50-72 against everyone else (66 win pace) Pretty on-brand for this wackadoodle season the Twins have had.
  12. I can't find what I'd read, might be paywalled, I might've fallen for an East Coast writer stating rumors as more factual than they were. So I guess omit the lack of effort part. In response to the rest of the 2026-directed action, there weren't any players other than Ryan (already discussed, which I granted could be used to support an effort to contend), Jeffers (who they weren't going to trade with literally no catching depth midseason), and Larnach (who could be a DFA candidate this offseason, not exactly in demand for contending teams) who were either arb 2 or arb 3 eligible next year. Beyond them, there weren't any healthy starters or position players available to trade. If you want to count Lewis, who I guess is technically arb 2 as a super 2 this offseason, trading him at the deadline would've been selling irresponsibly low on him. Also, the returns from the trades were not indicative to me of an effort to contend in 2026. Nothing was brought in to impact the position-player side in a meaningful way (if Roden and Outman are regulars next year, you're not contending) and the pitchers acquired with MLB potential in the short-term only have a realistic path to 2026 impact if some current starters are moved this offseason, which kinda defeats the purpose of reloading for contention in 2026. Even if they're moved to the bullpen to fill the gaping hole there, it's incredibly wishful thinking to think they effectively adapt to a new role immediately, which is what would have to happen in order for them to be impactful for contention in 2026. So outside a large infusion of free agent dollars (I'm not holding my breath on that happening), I don't see any path to contention that doesn't involve massive internal improvements in multiple areas and several starting pitcher prospects transitioning seamlessly to the bullpen. In other words, a whole lot of wishful thinking
  13. I'm sure it will be a total coincidence that his ankle will be good to go as soon as Kelly and Darrisaw are back in the lineup
  14. Right now, I don't actually think they're moving Jeffers because of the lack of current options, like you said. However, I can't be sure of anything because we don't know how deep the cuts are going to be this offseason. To me, given that Buxton, Ober, and Lopez were un-tradable at the time for various reasons, the only action they took at the trade deadline that suggests an intent to compete next year was retaining Joe Ryan - and from what I've read, that wasn't due to a lack of effort. So that I suppose is enough to muddy the waters for those trying to discern what their future plans are (assuming they actually have future plans, which I'm not convinced is a given). But if they do move Ryan - especially if they move Lopez as well - then anyone that isn't either pre-arb or Buxton is fair game. If it gets to that point, then why not entertain moving Jeffers? There would be more options in the offseason to replace him than there would be with an in-season move (hence no rumors of him getting traded this past deadline), even if it's a couple Vasquez clones, or even Vasquez himself at a more appropriate price point
  15. Trick question: they're going to be competing for Jeffers' starting spot after he gets traded this offseason once it's clear he's not interested in an extension. I'm kidding. At least I hope I'm kidding.
  16. I think it means he really likes gummies
  17. Ways I am lying to myself to convince myself that everything is going to be alright: Skule/Rouse have no business being out there and Darrisaw will make a huge difference Losing Kelly mid-game threw the line calls into chaos and they'll now develop a better contingency plan JJ won't be bringing a newborn baby into the world every week KOC hasn't yet gotten to the part of his QB tutorial where he teaches JJ how to step up in the pocket without just running forward and waiting to get sacked Addison will be much sharper and have better timing on outs/comebacks than Nailor The Falcons will reveal themselves to be a top 5 defense as the season goes on Dallas Turner will throw a coin into a fountain and use his wish on learning how to set the edge in the run game I'm definitely not staring into the abyss once again with only Christian Ponder staring back at me
  18. Agreed, I thought the shot downfield on 3rd and 1 was a good call, but I also thought it meant they were in a 4-down mindset. Punting made no sense and it all played out exactly how we thought it would. I saw somewhere he mentioned the earlier 4th down failed sneak as being on his mind when he decided to punt. Okay ... then maybe run something other than a sneak? Pretty sure that's allowed.
  19. Joe Ryan is weird in a good way
×
×
  • Create New...