I don't understand what he's trying to accomplish. You are not allowed to argue balls and strikes, so he has no standing if he's upset about being tossed. He admits in the article that he doesn't think Hernandez is missing calls on purpose, so what is the point of calling him out so publically like this? Does he expect Hernandez to just quit a really good job because some of the players think he's bad? Yeah right, that's laughable. How distasteful would we find it if an umpire was publically calling out a player for performing poorly? What if an umpire said something like this about an underperforming player, "player x just isn't very good at baseball, he needs to just go away. Just go away today and not play anymore, he is performing so poorly he's bad for baseball."? We'd all think that was unacceptable. Being true or not would have no impact on that. The way to address it is to discuss it privately with mlb. Doing it publically just seems like piling on for no good reason, and that makes it seem possibly personal.