So how did Gardy's decision Monday turn out in the longer view of the whole series? I think Gardy was thinking, "my starters haven't been getting past the fifth or sixth at best, except for Correia, and I used my bullpen a lot against Detroit and Baltimore, so I want to squeeze Correia as long as possible and give my bullpen a break today." Problem is, squeezing a guy like Correia as long as possible, starting the fourth time through the batting order in a 1-run game on the road is almost certainly going to wind up in a loss and/or a much longer game (if they tie and it goes into extra innings). The Twins only had 3 offensive outs left, and the Royals were guaranteed the last at-bat. Not only that, the Royals had their full bullpen available as Ervin Santana had already completed 8 innings (maybe influencing Gardy's decision to push Correia to do the same?) and the Twins had batters 6-7-8 due up in the 9th. And what was the result? The normal 8th inning guy who would have been saved by an extra inning from Correia (Burton) had to get up quickly and pitch anyway, although we were already behind by the time he was ready. Because we fell behind and lost, Perkins wasn't needed for the ninth, so I guess that's a silver lining. But neither guy was needed in the next two games of the series, which was followed by an off-day today (Thursday). So our bullpen aces, Perkins and Burton, have plenty of rest now (3-4 days). But after that initial activity against Detroit and Baltimore, it appears they've actually been used less overall than comparable relief aces on most other teams, and I think our record has 1 win less to show for it.