Jump to content
Twins Daily
  • Create Account

TheLeviathan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    21,582
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

 Content Type 

Profiles

Minnesota Twins News, Rumors & Analysis

Minnesota Twins Videos

2026 Minnesota Twins Top Prospect Rankings

2022 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Minnesota Twins Trade & Free Agent Rumors

Minnesota Twins Fan Guides & Resources

2023 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

The Minnesota Twins Players Project

2024 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2025 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

2026 Minnesota Twins Draft Picks & Signing Bonuses

Forums

Blogs

Events

Store

Downloads

Gallery

Everything posted by TheLeviathan

  1. I really want to know what the deal is with Gurley. His usage made no sense at all.
  2. The chunky milk commercial for wireless made me laugh. But yeah, I don't blame the NFL. Some games just don't turn out thrilling, if anything that's what makes me the most confident that NFL outcomes are legit. (Unlike, say, the NBA) Championship weekend was probably the best any of us will ever see, it's not shocking the Super Bowl was a step down.
  3. Brady was mostly bad too. It's like they were all hungover or half asleep.
  4. It was more bad offense than good defense for sure.
  5. I wish we had a right-handed Jake Cave.
  6. Also...why should we care where their payroll ranks relative to their team value? There isn't much of a correlation there to care about IMO. Plus, as you state here, the larger context of MLB is rife with issues for comparison. All I've heard anyone hold them to is their own stated number of 50% of revenue. I think some of these other attempts to contextualize the Twins' spending distracts from the root of the problem.
  7. I'd wear it out on Kramarczuk's sausage for sure.
  8. Wow! 15%? That's, like, at least 30% of how much they marked it up in the first place!
  9. I'm not saying you are doing anything wrong spycake, but I do question the way the stat is used broadly. But best left to other threads.
  10. Seems like you laid out the problems just fine. Sure, it makes sense to incorporate it, but remember all those problems when you use the stat too. Your convictions behind the stat should reflect the flaws in the ingredients. If I bake muffins I don't get to frame them as healthy because they have blueberries as I conveniently forgot the tub of sugar i put in it too.
  11. The fact that it's impossible without it in no way weakens my point. The problem is the nature of the adjustment itself.
  12. Yup, that's sorta my point. Despite the fact that the positional adjustment sorta makes it apples and oranges (or, at the very least, weakens the comparison considerably) - the stat is still widely used that way. I understand people want it to be a good comparison tool, but really what it can be used for is a very rough approximation of value. And in the cases of WAR totals driven by defensive calculations, it becomes pretty sketchy altogether. When I said the vast majority of people use it more forcefully than it is warranted, I'm speaking about just about every time it's used on Fangraphs. MVP arguments are rarely made with the very nuances argued in that link. For example, rarely when there is a large disparity (say, 6.0 vs. 3.0) is any mention made of how much the defensive component makes up each player's total. Certainly, here on this forum with Byron Buxton, this is true but you also see it on Fangraphs. I appreciate how they try and caution the use of the stat and they do a nice job laying out the limits of it, I wish they followed those outlines more frequently to set a better example.
  13. Except, it goes beyond just being a hardliner about 3.5 vs. 3.1. It's also about people comparing a 3.5 WAR in CF to a 3.5 WAR at 2B. That isn't a particularly responsible use of the stat either. Frankly, WAR is a fairly limited stat for accurate comparisons used too broadly IMO. There are better stats for assessing value (on offense and defense separately) and it may be best if we stop pretending we have a good measurement for both offense and defense that can be compared across positions or too rigidly.
  14. Republicans argue more people voting is unpatriotic. Yup, sounds about right.
  15. I understand the FO's "pounce at the right moment" strategy. I understand some of the defenses for it offered here. But how often are you going to have the perfect player for the perfect moment? Waiting for the stars to align is a very passive approach and has a very low probability of occurring. And even if it does occur, it's not like you're the only destination for that player to land, you still have to compete with other franchises to offer the most money. That seems like a strategy riddled with pitfalls and low on probability of success. I feel like they are willingly create this baseball scenario and trying to hit it on the ground on the right side:
  16. I wish people understood this, but I think the vast majority of people do not employ the stat appropriately.
  17. This will come back to bite this sport. I don't understand how ownership groups think this is good for the game long term. It's such short-term, misguided thinking.
  18. Things change quickly in baseball though. I agree with much of what you say, but I bet there are trade targets out there more appealing than this. And if there aren't....then I'm ok holding off. I don't want the team to make moves for the sake of it either. Kiriloff and Graterol are pretty valuable chips. If I'm pushing them into the middle of the table, I want to feel really good about what I'm getting back. And, frankly, I'm pretty ok with Castro/Garver/Austidillo. That's not where I'm pushing all-in to help. There are other places we can gain more from making a splash.
  19. If the price tag is Kiriloff and Graterol, I think I'd prefer to look elsewhere. I feel like that kind of package could land a pretty damn good pitcher and I'm more interested in that anyway.
  20. Let me know when this actually happens. Sounds like a defense for the other inactivity.
  21. No, I just mean they became more a part of the political process. And maybe I'm wrong, it appears FDR was the most noteworthy user. Has their purpose changed at all? I feel like their use now has more to do with bypassing congressional dysfunction.....
  22. Yup, I don't even remember hearing the term "executive order" until recent history. This is the root cause of most of our significant political ills.
  23. If only that was the most mundane thing that can trigger some. I was witness to a college student irate that a classmate had called them "buddy". MAGA hats aren't even close to what passes for offensive these days, the bar is much, much lower.
  24. I wonder if there are adjectives hyperbolic enough to describe how bad the strike will impact baseball. They need to figure this out and they very clearly aren't even trying.
×
×
  • Create New...